Moderator: Community Team

I'm going to stick with my D1 case of jonty's blatant bandwagon on Rodion. To recap (from my Mar 20 post):Rodion wrote:On with the game: who's scummiest and why?
This morning we woke up, and the only other person to support this case is dead. I've seen no reason yet to change my vote.drunkmonkey wrote:I thought I made it quite obvious that parts 2 and 3 were awful reasons to cast a vote. 1 is shaky. I was expecting you to respond by clarifying the real reasons you voted. The last thing I expected was "yep, you got it - I think he's scummy because he wants mafia to concede and for something I'm pretending he said". I think I found the bandwagon case I'm ready to settle on.jonty125 wrote:Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.drunkmonkey wrote:Here are your first two posts supporting your vote:jonty125 wrote:My position on Rodion hasn't changed. FOS shield for his post on the top of Page 8 I think.jonty125 wrote:vote Rodion. For instantly assuming there are no 3rd party players and asking some people effectively to give up one of the 2 games.So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?
vote jonty125
fastposted:Are you kidding me? You agree finding mafia is good, but...? BUT??? I'm not the least bit concerned about SK until the night flavor suggests one. Mafia is priority #1 right now. If I could make the above vote bolder, I would.jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.


everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
this post confused me..how do you know that you were shotRodion wrote:Soundman protected me.
PCM did not swap me around.
I was shot.
Soundman was shot.
2 shots (other than PCM's which we assume to have been shot from Side B) can mean:
mafia+SK
mafia+vig
2 mafias
I could be cleared by having a vigilante claim they targeted Soundman (which means mafia targeted me), but maybe we don't even have one.
Anyway, down 3 townies, 9 left in what could be a 6-3 or a 5-3-1 (or 5-2-2 if there are 2 mafias out there?). To top things off, losing 3 power roles capable of protecting makes massclaiming an even riskier plan than it would normally be.
Being that we have 7 days (6 and a half now) to get something done, I'll suggest that the vigilante claims (assuming we have one) if we make no advance in the next 48 hours.
On with the game: who's scummiest and why?
Side A Scene: Doc (soundman) saves dying person, but then diesSome7hingCLEVER wrote:this post confused me..how do you know that you were shot
See, I think the vig (assuming they exist) shouldn't claim because they'll more than likely die tonight and we aren't at LYLO. But I aren't an expert on this so could other people chip in.Rodion wrote:Being that we have 7 days (6 and a half now) to get something done, I'll suggest that the vigilante claims (assuming we have one) if we make no advance in the next 48 hours.
how do you know you were roleblocked?Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll talk more later, but for now, I will say I was roleblocked last night. 'Twouldn't surprise me if it was a townie that roleblocked me. If so, that should clear me enough, given Rodion was doc-protected.
-Sully
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
I sent in my action and I was notified that I was roleblocked?shieldgenerator7 wrote:how do you know you were roleblocked?Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll talk more later, but for now, I will say I was roleblocked last night. 'Twouldn't surprise me if it was a townie that roleblocked me. If so, that should clear me enough, given Rodion was doc-protected.
-Sully
ok, just clarifyingVictor Sullivan wrote:I sent in my action and I was notified that I was roleblocked?shieldgenerator7 wrote:how do you know you were roleblocked?Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll talk more later, but for now, I will say I was roleblocked last night. 'Twouldn't surprise me if it was a townie that roleblocked me. If so, that should clear me enough, given Rodion was doc-protected.
-Sully![]()
-Sully
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
I don't see how he'd more than likely die tonight, but not claiming might actually end up being a good idea given the recent circumstances.jonty125 wrote:See, I think the vig (assuming they exist) shouldn't claim because they'll more than likely die tonight and we aren't at LYLO. But I aren't an expert on this so could other people chip in.
Well mafia, are going to target a vig if he claims, aren't they?Rodion wrote:I don't see how he'd more than likely die tonight, but not claiming might actually end up being a good idea given the recent circumstances.jonty125 wrote:See, I think the vig (assuming they exist) shouldn't claim because they'll more than likely die tonight and we aren't at LYLO. But I aren't an expert on this so could other people chip in.
Should we get a prod on everyone that has not posted here?
I've been trying to work that one out as welldrunkmonkey wrote:What's the benefit of the vig claiming?
Not if they have reason to believe there are better power roles out there.jonty125 wrote:Well mafia, are going to target a vig if he claims, aren't they?
That would be clearing Rodion if the vig claims to have targeted Soundman. If the vig claims to have targeted me, no benefit really.That's why instead of requesting an immediate claim I suggested that we spend 48 hours trying to advance the game through other means.drunkmonkey wrote:What's the benefit of the vig claiming?