Is the scoreboard broken or have I missed something? Usually the General Congrats thread is like a CCTV Guide, but I see nothing in there.danryan wrote:My favorite conqueror is now Chariot of Fire. He has done the site a great service today.
Moderator: Community Team
Is the scoreboard broken or have I missed something? Usually the General Congrats thread is like a CCTV Guide, but I see nothing in there.danryan wrote:My favorite conqueror is now Chariot of Fire. He has done the site a great service today.

Quite right too. There hasn't been some decent congrats to the great and the good of CC for some time.Master Fenrir wrote:Is the scoreboard broken or have I missed something? Usually the General Congrats thread is like a CCTV Guide, but I see nothing in there.danryan wrote:My favorite conqueror is now Chariot of Fire. He has done the site a great service today.
You might want to check the C&A.Master Fenrir wrote:Is the scoreboard broken or have I missed something? Usually the General Congrats thread is like a CCTV Guide, but I see nothing in there.danryan wrote:My favorite conqueror is now Chariot of Fire. He has done the site a great service today.
Oh Dear, good luck with your education young man, stick to task!uk massive wrote:Since joining CC, there has only been a couple of Conquerors, I voted Gen.LeeGettinhed, he is the currant one, and to become conquerer is not an easy task. he is very active, organizing tournaments, and helping out anyone if needed, I feel GLG is very approachable.

Do I know you? I am very tempted to report this post, but I'm not going to. I don't want to flame the fires on this spurious allegation.Siedshow99 wrote:Trap why dont you go drink one of your faggot beers.
Your fires are an array of pretty colors, like skittles.trapyoung wrote:Do I know you? I am very tempted to report this post, but I'm not going to. I don't want to flame the fires on this spurious allegation.Siedshow99 wrote:Trap why dont you go drink one of your faggot beers.
We need to be careful. Glg is showing all the correct attributes to become the president of the USA one day.eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
Yes this brings dishonor to all internet polling that had ever existed.eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
eddie, eddie, eddie:eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
Whats funny is I could send a pm and get 50 votes on whoever. But why bother? It's all bs anyway.Crazyirishman wrote:Yes this brings dishonor to all internet polling that had ever existed.eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
You're hilarious. We get it. Moving on.Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:eddie, eddie, eddie:eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
In some cultures there is something called politics and people are encouraged to vote. In addition to the outrageous practice you allege, I've also been accused of:
-flying banners across NYC, Chicago and LA that say "vote for GLG"
-putting 10,000 messages in 10,000 bottles into the ocean saying "vote for GLG"
-transmitting on 7 frequencies to outter space encouraging aliens to "vote for GLG"
-sending mental telepathy to other earthlings re: "vote for GLG"
-making porpoise/dolphin/whale sounds in the water encouraging aqua-mammals to "vote for GLG"
-stayed awake until dawn encouraging vampires to "vote for GLG"
-sitting in a pumpkin patch waiting to ask the GREAT PUMPKIN to "vote for GLG"

lol that is just sad. I would say more but the chump will report me.eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
rofl sdh you were in live chat when the player asked us for the link to this thread because he read the new c and a report.. So wanted to change his vote.sdh wrote:lol that is just sad. I would say more but the chump will report me.eddie2 wrote:well well this thread is a farce... from what i have been told in live chat yesterday glg is pming players having a chat with them making himself friendly he is them linking them to this thread to place a vote.
Jamie wrote:None of them. Every single conquerer is nothing but a point farming cheater. If I played a best of 7 series one on one with each of them on a flat rate sequential classic map, I would win the vast majority of those series. Its easy to get points when you play team freestyle games against newbs, especially on small maps, or hard to play maps that newbs and even myself sometimes don't understand. Rail Europe being near the top of the list. Put me one on one on a normal flat rate sequential map where the only real luck is the drop, and I am VERY difficult to beat. Not that I think I am better then every conquerer on the site, but I bet I'm better then most of them in a straight up game.

Yeas, I understand Jamie's sentiment in light of what the position of Conqueror has become but it's not a sensible claim. A good many of these players are actually some of the best all around strategists on the site and christ they work hard. Throwing you into an 8 player sequential on Rail Europe with Comic boy, Poo-maker, Scottland etc you would be a lamb to the slaughter. No offense intended but the level of concentration and attention to detail at the top of the board is unlike lower down. There are accepted protocols which you would need to learn and you would need to weigh every move to the precision of a chess grandmaster.Bruceswar wrote:Jamie wrote:None of them. Every single conquerer is nothing but a point farming cheater. If I played a best of 7 series one on one with each of them on a flat rate sequential classic map, I would win the vast majority of those series. Its easy to get points when you play team freestyle games against newbs, especially on small maps, or hard to play maps that newbs and even myself sometimes don't understand. Rail Europe being near the top of the list. Put me one on one on a normal flat rate sequential map where the only real luck is the drop, and I am VERY difficult to beat. Not that I think I am better then every conquerer on the site, but I bet I'm better then most of them in a straight up game.
I bet 100% you would not win most of the games.These players did not get to the top with ease. If it was sooo easy everybody would do it.
That brought me out in a cold sweat.jiminski wrote:Yeas, I understand Jamie's sentiment in light of what the position of Conqueror has become but it's not a sensible claim. A good many of these players are actually some of the best all around strategists on the site and christ they work hard. Throwing you into an 8 player sequential on Rail Europe with Comic boy, Poo-maker, Scottland etc you would be a lamb to the slaughter. No offense intended but the level of concentration and attention to detail at the top of the board is unlike lower down. There are accepted protocols which you would need to learn and you would need to weigh every move to the precision of a chess grandmaster.Bruceswar wrote:Jamie wrote:None of them. Every single conquerer is nothing but a point farming cheater. If I played a best of 7 series one on one with each of them on a flat rate sequential classic map, I would win the vast majority of those series. Its easy to get points when you play team freestyle games against newbs, especially on small maps, or hard to play maps that newbs and even myself sometimes don't understand. Rail Europe being near the top of the list. Put me one on one on a normal flat rate sequential map where the only real luck is the drop, and I am VERY difficult to beat. Not that I think I am better then every conquerer on the site, but I bet I'm better then most of them in a straight up game.
I bet 100% you would not win most of the games.These players did not get to the top with ease. If it was sooo easy everybody would do it.
jiminski wrote:Yeas, I understand Jamie's sentiment in light of what the position of Conqueror has become but it's not a sensible claim. A good many of these players are actually some of the best all around strategists on the site and christ they work hard. Throwing you into an 8 player sequential on Rail Europe with Comic boy, Poo-maker, Scottland etc you would be a lamb to the slaughter. No offense intended but the level of concentration and attention to detail at the top of the board is unlike lower down. There are accepted protocols which you would need to learn and you would need to weigh every move to the precision of a chess grandmaster.Bruceswar wrote:Jamie wrote:None of them. Every single conquerer is nothing but a point farming cheater. If I played a best of 7 series one on one with each of them on a flat rate sequential classic map, I would win the vast majority of those series. Its easy to get points when you play team freestyle games against newbs, especially on small maps, or hard to play maps that newbs and even myself sometimes don't understand. Rail Europe being near the top of the list. Put me one on one on a normal flat rate sequential map where the only real luck is the drop, and I am VERY difficult to beat. Not that I think I am better then every conquerer on the site, but I bet I'm better then most of them in a straight up game.
I bet 100% you would not win most of the games.These players did not get to the top with ease. If it was sooo easy everybody would do it.
Jamie wrote:jiminski wrote:Yeas, I understand Jamie's sentiment in light of what the position of Conqueror has become but it's not a sensible claim. A good many of these players are actually some of the best all around strategists on the site and christ they work hard. Throwing you into an 8 player sequential on Rail Europe with Comic boy, Poo-maker, Scottland etc you would be a lamb to the slaughter. No offense intended but the level of concentration and attention to detail at the top of the board is unlike lower down. There are accepted protocols which you would need to learn and you would need to weigh every move to the precision of a chess grandmaster.Bruceswar wrote:Jamie wrote:None of them. Every single conquerer is nothing but a point farming cheater. If I played a best of 7 series one on one with each of them on a flat rate sequential classic map, I would win the vast majority of those series. Its easy to get points when you play team freestyle games against newbs, especially on small maps, or hard to play maps that newbs and even myself sometimes don't understand. Rail Europe being near the top of the list. Put me one on one on a normal flat rate sequential map where the only real luck is the drop, and I am VERY difficult to beat. Not that I think I am better then every conquerer on the site, but I bet I'm better then most of them in a straight up game.
I bet 100% you would not win most of the games.These players did not get to the top with ease. If it was sooo easy everybody would do it.
Yes, I would get slaughtered by most COOKS on the rail europe map. I specifically pointed that map out as virtually impossible to play or understand, unless you had a hand in designing the thing. I guess in short, if conquerers played the same types of games I did, there rank would be no higher then mine, if not less. I made it all the way to COLONEL without farming for points. I just played the games and whatever happened happened. The only reason my rank is what it is now, is I am trying to get all my gold medals, and have been playing all sorts of maps I hate in formats that I hate or don't play well
I accept your challengeJamie wrote:None of them. Every single conquerer is nothing but a point farming cheater. If I played a best of 7 series one on one with each of them on a flat rate sequential classic map, I would win the vast majority of those series. Its easy to get points when you play team freestyle games against newbs, especially on small maps, or hard to play maps that newbs and even myself sometimes don't understand. Rail Europe being near the top of the list. Put me one on one on a normal flat rate sequential map where the only real luck is the drop, and I am VERY difficult to beat. Not that I think I am better then every conquerer on the site, but I bet I'm better then most of them in a straight up game.