Yeah? Maybe I am.creepbro wrote:Sorry, but I don't think you know what "random" means.
Sorry, I just think your an idiot.
But that still doesn't improve your understanding of randomness...
Moderator: Community Team
Yeah? Maybe I am.creepbro wrote:Sorry, but I don't think you know what "random" means.
Sorry, I just think your an idiot.

I think I agree with you here natty. THis guy doesn't seem to know what random means.natty dread wrote:Yeah? Maybe I am.creepbro wrote:Sorry, but I don't think you know what "random" means.
Sorry, I just think your an idiot.
But that still doesn't improve your understanding of randomness...
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.

yes gilligan, they are even statistically,Gilligan wrote:Your dice are completely even, Aslan.
Your avg roll:
Atk 3.51
Def 3.50
All 3.51
Opponents avg roll:
Atk 3.51
Def 3.51
All 3.51
All 0%
AslanTheKing wrote:yes gilligan, they are even statistically,Gilligan wrote:Your dice are completely even, Aslan.
Your avg roll:
Atk 3.51
Def 3.50
All 3.51
Opponents avg roll:
Atk 3.51
Def 3.51
All 3.51
All 0%
but as someone stated logically somewhere else,
whats the point of having terrible dice( like in trying to take australia in classic-which is 80 percent a gamewin),
and after losing australia getting good dice, where the opponent secured his bonus and outnumbering u every rd,
then at the end of the game you get good rolls, but opponent has already stacked up his defense, do you get my logic?
cause i dont get your statistic
But why would that scenario happen to you more than anyone else?Is it totally inconcievable to you that you might,just might,be tactically wanting?I speak as a player who has many weaknesses and willingly acknowledges them.In 4700 games I've inevitably had the shitty end of the stick a few times,but not once,and anyone can check this,have I cried about it.There are way more important things to get upset about..
( easy example if 50 percent of the population usa live in florida and 50 percent in alaska, then statistically the population of us is living in a `moderate`climate, but in reality 50 percent are freezing there a++ off and 50 percent having a nice suntan, and u know how nice summer in alaska is
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
No shitshieldgenerator7 wrote:you don't complaim about dice in chess... there is none!



lshicastr natty your comment made me laughnatty dread wrote:No shitshieldgenerator7 wrote:you don't complaim about dice in chess... there is none!
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
jimbostonchess.eushieldgenerator7 wrote:lshicastr of course you don't complaim about dice in chess... there is none! lol
BTW what chess site do you play?
Crikey, you could tile my whole bathroom with those teethjimboston wrote:I have some Dice Bitches for you...
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Clearly your ambition outstrips your ability and this makes you unhappy,so stick to chess.Not everyone needs to be very successful to enjoy a game,these people deserve not to have their fun spoiled by constant whining..AslanTheKing wrote:But why would that scenario happen to you more than anyone else?Is it totally inconcievable to you that you might,just might,be tactically wanting?I speak as a player who has many weaknesses and willingly acknowledges them.In 4700 games I've inevitably had the shitty end of the stick a few times,but not once,and anyone can check this,have I cried about it
Maybe cause i hate losing? and i care if i lose? you had the shitty stick in 4700 games, i had them with 500, and if this goes on i will have your rank
and your points in 5000 games, and i dont like that rank, get it? it wouldnt make me happy, no success,
i have a goal, and i do my best to get better, if i dont get better, i want wasting my time- lets say trying 5000 games,
and just look at the scoreboard, there are even freebees with 250 games only at the top, now whats your message?
they are so much better strategically then u? ( or me) with this dice you dont need strategy anymore, just roll 6 all the time and roll 3 when the others have 2 or 1 dice,
i like also playing chess , and i win alot ( never complained there at the dice
Firstly I cannot set up 5 games,even if I wanted to,as a freemium,and secondly the results of 5 games would have absolutely no bearing on anything,either of us could win all 5 and it would make no difference to my opinion.Thirdly,I would not enjoy it,the reason I play is for enjoyment believe it or not.So Mr.Crybaby it ain't gonna happen.AslanTheKing wrote:and to make it very dicedependent , set up 5 classic games , all flatrate, im looking forward to fun with u, mr 5000 games 1300 points
If that were to happen it would be entirely down to my inadequacies as a tactician,I would accept it like an adult..AslanTheKing wrote:i apologize, mr Score:1591Games:4732,
ill see u again when youve reached 1200