Moderator: Cartographers

It just feels weird for me to look at Sweden tilted like that. Therefore I can't support the it! I support the map though! Good work Roberth thanks to you we swedes might have a home map soonRoberth wrote:I have now tried to rotate the map. Don't mind some crudeness in pixelated graphics and placement of text and army numbers. I just made this quick to see how it would be if it was rotated.
Here: I don't think it makes any big difference and feel like the version before is better. What do you think? Is this rotated version better?
I totally agrees with you. It looks weird. You makes my point. And that's why I don't want it to be rotated.Gillipig wrote: It just feels weird for me to look at Sweden tilted like that. Therefore I can't support the it! I support the map though! Good work Roberth thanks to you we swedes might have a home map soon!

natty dread wrote:If on the other hand you have "it looks weird" and on the other you have "it's hard to read and is too cluttered", which do you think is better overall?

But with supersize, the map would still require lots of scrolling... most people these days have monitors with a vertical resolution between 1024-1080. If you substract from that the browser interface etc. you're left with around 850 pixels or so.Bruceswar wrote:natty dread wrote:If on the other hand you have "it looks weird" and on the other you have "it's hard to read and is too cluttered", which do you think is better overall?
The Fix to both answers... Supersize it. We have the tools now, so lets use them.



You mean that the territories should have textures?Industrial Helix wrote:Just throwing this out there, but this map could use some texture.
Helix means the map as a whole could do with some texture, not a lot, just enough to give it some depth. Also can you please update the first post with your current version.Roberth wrote:You mean that the territories should have textures?Industrial Helix wrote:Just throwing this out there, but this map could use some texture.


