Moderator: Community Team
Sorry UNVOTE JAKIron Butterfly wrote:Ok I will unvote Jak.
But you guys wanna see somthing funny???
Since everyone was talking about Matrix Flavor and which characters would be Masons here is something....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_(The_Matrix)
JUST SAYIN
Fine let's Meta some more...It would make sense to have Marovignan and the Twins as one faction, with the computers/sentinels/Deus ex Machina as another faction. Throw in Agent Smith as the SK, and there will be a lot of killing night one. Or perhaps the machines are all one player, controlled by Deus ex...essentially two SKs. However, that leaves the mafia short a few players. Endless possibilities...Iron Butterfly wrote:Sorry UNVOTE JAKIron Butterfly wrote:Ok I will unvote Jak.
But you guys wanna see somthing funny???
Since everyone was talking about Matrix Flavor and which characters would be Masons here is something....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_(The_Matrix)
JUST SAYIN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQ8wBiEtGw Twins would be great Masons.
Agreed. Twins would be awesome. I was hoping for that role. I would def assume they would be in game and masons. Almost 100%. Good point though. Jak and Doom def not in the clear just yet. But I will give them benefit for now. Least we do know that they are on same side, which ever it is.Iron Butterfly wrote:Sorry UNVOTE JAKIron Butterfly wrote:Ok I will unvote Jak.
But you guys wanna see somthing funny???
Since everyone was talking about Matrix Flavor and which characters would be Masons here is something....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_(The_Matrix)
JUST SAYIN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQ8wBiEtGw Twins would be great Masons.


His last post was Thursday. He found time Saturday to post someplace else a couple of times.jak111 wrote:So, see anyone on the list I made that seems a worthy candidate for the wagonteers? Personally I'm gonna go with skillfulsniper. He's the longest inactive, and he really hasn't contributed anything to the game. So. Vote Sniper (Unvote, if needed, don't think so..)
So I post Friday and don't post Saturday or Sunday because I'm always busy on weekends and you label me an inactive? Seriously?jak111 wrote: For inactives or non contributers (or small ones) we have: (also sort by author to confirm this)
~ Soundman with 8 posts to date. 2 posts on the 20th and before that he last posted on the 17th in the joke vote still.
They make one post each and he puts them together. In response to the underlined, where are their other "chats and interludes"? Here are the posts between them for reference.thehippo8 wrote:Sorry Doom, got back from holiday in the weekend and still trying to catch my tail. I've been reading and watching but you are right, not contributing. I consider my hand slapped. I am interested that Betico, Dazza and Sparticus are having lovely little chats and interludes. Looking really professional and on to it but IMHO seem joined at the hip and going unchallenged. IMHO Betico screams out loudest as being too "try hard" and "daddy" for my liking.DoomYoshi wrote:Jak has been scummy. If I wasn't his partner I would be on the BW too. Normally I wouldn't out myself, but I feel he already kinda outed me.
IB has been pretty thin-skinned this game, but that is a cat to skin a different day I think.
Vote the hippo
BW jumping combined with flying under radar/not contributing.
Unvote vote Betico
A reply to Edocsil's post.betiko wrote:edocsil, that "guidebook" thing for a vt on day 1 makes no sense. If I was doc for example and a VT claims doc; i would imediately see him as scum. protect him on night 1, really? a vt should claim vt because he is not important and can mess many things up if he starts fakeclaiming town power roles.
And there is no "playing by the book", as that would make town predictable, and the whole point is to do stuff that mafia don't expect and wifom them.
FOS edocsil because he seems like a very experienced player and all this seems weird from him, unless he was just fishing for info..
A reply to Betico's post.dazza2008 wrote: You are clearly misunderstanding his point. He is not saying to fakeclaim at all. He is saying try not to draw attention and be forced to claim. But during the day try to look important enough for the scum to kill you instead of someone who really is a power role.
If the doc believes it too and protects you then that is a bonus as there will be no kill at all.
A thank you to Dazza for clarification.SPARTACUS1974 wrote:thanks for explaining dazza i was a little bit confused by what edoc had said but it does make sence to draw attention towards you if you are a vt and away from the others .
and what does wifom mean?
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Fine let's Meta some more...It would make sense to have Marovignan and the Twins as one faction, with the computers/sentinels/Deus ex Machina as another faction. Throw in Agent Smith as the SK, and there will be a lot of killing night one. Or perhaps the machines are all one player, controlled by Deus ex...essentially two SKs. However, that leaves the mafia short a few players. Endless possibilities...Iron Butterfly wrote:Sorry UNVOTE JAKIron Butterfly wrote:Ok I will unvote Jak.
But you guys wanna see somthing funny???
Since everyone was talking about Matrix Flavor and which characters would be Masons here is something....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_(The_Matrix)
JUST SAYIN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQ8wBiEtGw Twins would be great Masons.
However, if they are mafia, why do they need to be masoned? That is not logical...is it? So, why the meta thought on something that is near 0% happening?
if you look at crazy super hero mafia i was mafia and we were masoned i honestly didnt see the point but just pointing it out that it could happen
As to jak, I'm all for pressuring the inactives. (My other thought was to pressure one of the voters that were on both mine and jak's bandwagon. That was Dazza, Iron Butterfly, and Everywhere. However, I'm not sure I can blame any of them for voting me...or jak. Nor do any of them cross check with jak111's list.) And really they are all more active, which will eventually lead to their demise, if they are mafia. The inactives can continue to skate along all they want, though. Never helping us out, and never posting enough to have a slip-up.
but i have to say i am against pressuring inactives. at least not before they have a chance to defend themselves and especially not if we have a better case so ill say pressuring right now is pretty decent idea. i think a prod is in place but only on a list of inactives that i can gather later today if you would like.
I would vote for one of the five submariners.

I clearly stated that I would be away this weekend, and yesterday went to rereading this and another game, so even thou I will admit that I have not contributed much, as S7C states, I would not call myself inactivejak111 wrote: For inactives or non contributers (or small ones) we have: (also sort by author to confirm this)
~ CMS who hasn't contributed much in the last couple of days besides jumping on the band wagon a few days ago and then continuing to pressure JG before just making random posts to seem active)
~ Eldario whom has 7 posts to date. His last post was 3 days ago.
~ MoB whom since the Diablo beta is over, we expect to see him post within the next day or so.
~ Skillfulsniper who hasn't posted since 4 days ago. Has only 7 posts to date.
~ Soundman with 8 posts to date. 2 posts on the 20th and before that he last posted on the 17th in the joke vote still.
So in conclusion, none of you can tell me you've had your eyes anywhere but for me. None of you noticed really 5 inactives? NO ONE?!?
Well should we discuss the guy who is being scummy or turn a blind eye and just randomly pick on the quiet one ?jak111 wrote: Anyone wishing to fight my statement above, point out where you mentioned any of those 5 or someone else since the beginning of the wagon on me. I bet not a single one of you can.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:
jonty125- OMG...ONE LINES??? EVERYSINGLE ONE OF HIS DAMN POST ARE ONE OR TWO LINERS AND I JUST CANT HELP BUT LAUGH ITS SO DUMB
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
That is very true for Mafia.shieldgenerator7 wrote:ABout the mafia masons thing, I think we have some confused n00bs.
A mason only implies that the two masons can talk at night. Mafia are usually by definition "masoned" in that they all know who each other are and can all talk at night. It's unnecessary to say Mafia are masons because it's a given.
This also means that "mason" is a vialable (altho extremely risky) claim for mafia. They can claim masons and get away with it because their scum buddy would back them up. However it is very risky because if one of them dies then the town knows they're not really masons.
-SG7 ()
There is such a thing as a mafia mason, though. A mafia member who is paired with a town mason who might or might not have been told that his partner could be scum. Very bastard role. I don't like them. However, I doubt anything like that is happening here.shieldgenerator7 wrote:ABout the mafia masons thing, I think we have some confused n00bs.
A mason only implies that the two masons can talk at night. Mafia are usually by definition "masoned" in that they all know who each other are and can all talk at night. It's unnecessary to say Mafia are masons because it's a given.
This also means that "mason" is a vialable (altho extremely risky) claim for mafia. They can claim masons and get away with it because their scum buddy would back them up. However it is very risky because if one of them dies then the town knows they're not really masons.
-SG7 ()
Or how about actually paying attention to everyone. That is the problem here, I get why people chose me to vote for and pick apart at, bit it's another thing to completely ignore everyone else. That's where the town turned their blind eye on.jonty125 wrote: Well should we discuss the guy who is being scummy or turn a blind eye and just randomly pick on the quiet one ?
So instead they should give a few one-liners on some new reason to find you scummy? It's been something else you've been critical off...jak111 wrote: As for Leehar's post, I didn't OMGUS everyone... just 96% of them... ;3. Though really, there were a few bad calls in the voting on me, like at least they could've stated their opinions instead of following the leader so to speak. I don't know about you but the whole "I don't wanna say what other people already said so I'm just now going to vote for you" thing does not speak much to me about them trying anything besides joining the wagon, ya know?
This is what I'm trying to get at in an unclear sort of way I guess. That people don't bother using their single vote wisely sometimes. Yea I get that sometimes you're on a bandwagon and trying to get info, but unless someone pointed out that their 100% scum or at least pretty close, they should have something to say in why they believe you are. Even a one line post would be more than saying up front you don't wanna say what others have said. Hell, it'd be useful if you did say what others have said, I can guarantee that your point of view is not exactly the same as another person's view, so give a bit of your own insight on things.Leehar wrote: I'll accede to your point that some of the votes were indicative of a lack of participation by the interest, which I think reflects a general malaise in the use of 'people power'. It's another reason why I've been disappointed in the vote-jumpers like Hippo etc. Even if you don't have 1 vote, it should still be used wisely, and it seems people are often content not to put the effort in to making good decisions... (think I ended up going a bit ot there, but the principle still holds true methinks)
