unvote vote jonty for hating logiceverywhere116 wrote:Unvote vote jonty
Moderator: Community Team
unvote vote jonty for hating logiceverywhere116 wrote:Unvote vote jonty

Thank you. It was beginning to bug me. Votes in green, I'm using red and blue./ wrote:unvote vote vodeon, fos dj
For being rule skimming, satanic red users!
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
vote / for assery/ wrote:unvote vote vodeon, fos dj
For being rule skimming, satanic red users!

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

That is correct she did come out with her role when she entered but who knows at least we didnt have to waste time beating it out of her.safariguy5 wrote:unvote vote vodean Watch, he's going to claim prematurely anyways, might as well get it over with now rather than at a more inopportune time (See Matrix Mafia).
Also, I'm semi-serious about that.

unvote vote safariguy5 that is hardly a reason to semi-seriously vote anyonesafariguy5 wrote:unvote vote vodean Watch, he's going to claim prematurely anyways, might as well get it over with now rather than at a more inopportune time (See Matrix Mafia).
Also, I'm semi-serious about that.
hmmm... good point.... vote safguyjonty125 wrote:unvote vote safariguy5 that is hardly a reason to semi-seriously vote anyonesafariguy5 wrote:unvote vote vodean Watch, he's going to claim prematurely anyways, might as well get it over with now rather than at a more inopportune time (See Matrix Mafia).
Also, I'm semi-serious about that.

What was the reason exactly? You replaced a player who had little to no vote pressure. You now have been called out at least once for this pattern of claiming at really odd times.vodean wrote:unvote
i claimed there for good reasons.
Here, i have no need to claim

agreed/ wrote:Hey, safari, meta is fine and all, and as a mod I suppose you can do whatever you want with your own games, but isn't what you know about someone's play-style in comparison to an ongoing hosted game you have all the info to, going a bit far?
I mean, if you want to press this issue for real using other games as examples, fine, but if you want to question vodean about matrix, can't you take it to PMs where it won't make these games run-off on each other?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I was using matrix as an example. If memory serves me correctly, vodean was also prone to claiming with little provocation in the earlier games he/she was in. Matrix is just a recent example, but I suppose this discussion probably won't directly lead to anything./ wrote:Hey, safari, meta is fine and all, and as a mod I suppose you can do whatever you want with your own games, but isn't what you know about someone's play-style in comparison to an ongoing hosted game you have all the info to, going a bit far?
I mean, if you want to press this issue for real using other games as examples, fine, but if you want to question vodean about matrix, can't you take it to PMs where it won't make these games run-off on each other?

Kind of a bit early to be calling that out, don't you think?Some7hingCLEVER wrote:vote vodeon for vote jumping like a kangaroo
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

Possibly because of the connections with a game that saf has all knowledge of.freezie wrote:I also don't see why Edoc intervened on this one...Meta is definitly not a good way to build a real case, but in this particular case..it's somewhat a valid note for day 1. I don't see why everyone jumped for this.