Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Moderator: Community Team
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
jonty, it is this particular form of BW that catches people's eyes. for someone who is on a number of scumdars, atm, you should justify your every vote.jonty125 wrote:Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?

Speak your thoughts IB, you still haven't spoken them since I called you out on not posting. You could change your vote if you wanted to, but this I am seeing as extremely scummy play.Iron Butterfly wrote:And Jak..by you playing Hall monitor you now make it difficult for people to speak their thoughts and change their minds.
If I decided I wanted to change my vote to Everywhere it would now appear I was bandwagoning and trying to "appear" town by hopping to the popular case.
aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
so you want to get 4 claims in one day? seriously? honestly i feel that is to much. your pushing and pushing and pushing till somone claims mafia and that will not happen and sooner or later your gonna end up revealing a power role that should not be revealed. and why are you so hellbent on me being killed? did i not defend myself good enough? i mean seriously. i feel tht everywhere is scummy but im a little late to put my vote on him so oh well.vodean wrote:jonty, it is this particular form of BW that catches people's eyes. for someone who is on a number of scumdars, atm, you should justify your every vote.jonty125 wrote:Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
I move that we pressure jonty next, (tomorrow, if we lynch everywhere, or S7C, perhaps?)
That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
That should be easy enough to prove. If somebody could put you at L-1, you could vote yourself. you can then cast a vote for yourself. If you are a priest nothing should happen, if you are lying you are lynched.everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
what is a priest i thought they were the people who want to get a no lynch as there win condition. am i wrong?thechuck51 wrote:That should be easy enough to prove. If somebody could put you at L-1, you could vote yourself. you can then cast a vote for yourself. If you are a priest nothing should happen, if you are lying you are lynched.everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
Not exactly. Your very very very subtle hint left little room for other characters. It is true that I might have provided you with an excellent fake claim, but I doubt you would've posted the hint without having Sati in mind even if you are fakeclaiming. Then again, here is our chance to find out. vote everyeverywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim..aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
lol yes vote count please.thechuck51 wrote:Can we have a vote count please?

^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
actually he never said his name just that he was priest. but your right he softclaimed it i think vodean was just asking for a hard claim.jak111 wrote:^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
Anyway. Anyone who votes Everywhere before the vote count can consider themselves auto-lynched tomorrow. No townie would lynch someone when they are trying to prove that they are town.
He said that aage was correct about the name (sati) but wrong about the role (priest not a hider). I think that qualifies as a hard claim.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:actually he never said his name just that he was priest. but your right he softclaimed it i think vodean was just asking for a hard claim.jak111 wrote:^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
Anyway. Anyone who votes Everywhere before the vote count can consider themselves auto-lynched tomorrow. No townie would lynch someone when they are trying to prove that they are town.
checked i guess your right. ya that is a bit of skimming but i missed it on my first read to so.thechuck51 wrote:He said that aage was correct about the name (sati) but wrong about the role (priest not a hider). I think that qualifies as a hard claim.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:actually he never said his name just that he was priest. but your right he softclaimed it i think vodean was just asking for a hard claim.jak111 wrote:^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
Anyway. Anyone who votes Everywhere before the vote count can consider themselves auto-lynched tomorrow. No townie would lynch someone when they are trying to prove that they are town.

jak111 wrote:Now that that's all solved, time for Saf to either post the lynch scene (I don't think mafia would hammer themselves) so I think someone should just 'unvote' for now. It won't effect the case because if he's lying he's already lynched, if not he's brought back down to L-2 at least.
thats a good call. unvotejak111 wrote:Now that that's all solved, time for Saf to either post the lynch scene (I don't think mafia would hammer themselves) so I think someone should just 'unvote' for now. It won't effect the case because if he's lying he's already lynched, if not he's brought back down to L-2 at least.
everywhere116 wrote:However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
I don't see what you could have misread or what could have been a typo. What did you think it said?vodean wrote:im sorry, i just misread that post... i thought it was a typo.