Moderator: Community Team
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:im not sure what we can do with this little time vote zimmah since its litterally the only thing we have to go on .
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I was hoping for a vote count/defense from zimmah but it doesn't appear that zimmah is in danger of being lynched yet so I'll also Vote Zimmah and we'll see what happensDoomYoshi wrote:Ok, I need to spur activity somehow.
I am thinking of making the player with the most votes be lynched at end of day. Are there any objections? Also, ghost has been fairly inactive, but we are late enough that it isn't fair to replace. I could do a modkill there and it would lower the threshold for lynches on future days.
Thoughts? Comments? Feel free to PM me about any issues.
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.DoomYoshi wrote:Tuesday night mass prod.
Zinmah (5) - Rodion, edoc, kratos, clever, jonty
No objections here.DoomYoshi wrote:Ok, I need to spur activity somehow.
I am thinking of making the player with the most votes be lynched at end of day. Are there any objections? Also, ghost has been fairly inactive, but we are late enough that it isn't fair to replace. I could do a modkill there and it would lower the threshold for lynches on future days.
Thoughts? Comments? Feel free to PM me about any issues.
I love a good modkillun.jonty125 wrote:No objections here.DoomYoshi wrote:Ok, I need to spur activity somehow.
I am thinking of making the player with the most votes be lynched at end of day. Are there any objections? Also, ghost has been fairly inactive, but we are late enough that it isn't fair to replace. I could do a modkill there and it would lower the threshold for lynches on future days.
Thoughts? Comments? Feel free to PM me about any issues.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ya sorry i am moving today and am checking this one time today. sorry i never did the list. i got hit with busy things.jonty125 wrote:I saw you [Rodion] as slightly suspicious by how hard you were trying to push for a vote, but probably only sFOS worthy. Then when zimmah came out and voted you, I was expecting something new to be brought to the table, alas it wasn't. Did I need clarification? Possibly, I was pretty unsure who was scummy and when someone votes, "to get things moving", I was expecting some ground-breaking new evidence.Rodion wrote:Asks for clarification on something that is merely a follow-up of something else to which Jonty had already agreed with. He shouldn't "need" this clarification, should he?jonty125 wrote:Can you explain further?zimmah wrote:'m just going to go ahead and vote rodion to get things moving.
I find the bolded bit off. Mafia, often will distance themselves from scum-buddies to avoid been associated with them if one dies. Supposing you were mafia, going 1 v 1 with strike could result with one of you dying and the other getting town credibility. I'm really not sure what to think of regarding the last statement. But I can't discredit you for the questions.zimmah wrote:
and trust me, i know what distancing is, but you have to admit that the way i 'distanced' myself from strike was either a genius move or a very stupid one. because almost noone suspected strike, and if i just lurked that day, i would not attract any suspicion (especially because lurkers are often ignored on CC) and strike may have still lived. I have not often been mafia, but in the few cases that i was, (for example stool pigeon) i knew better than to make stupid mistakes like that.
you really gotta give me more credit rodion, ... (both as a mafia player and as a 'good guy' in this game)
Do you have any thoughts on the game?Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ill do an inactives list
jonty125 wrote:5 days until deadline, and no major cases, and I haven't got much, should we massclaim?
vote zimmah For reasons previously stated I find his paragraph "off" and you voted Rodion for OMGUS.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:im not sure what we can do with this little time vote zimmah since its litterally the only thing we have to go on .

That Zimmah died. This is another Zimmah replacing someone.freezie wrote:Like I said day 1...I still beleive him to be town.
i thought i was at L-5 due to the weird counting system.kratos644 wrote:You're at L-1 and all you're going to post is an eye roll? Really?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
trust me, in this case, if the RL is me, it's worse than NLedocsil wrote:There is no strength at all. However, a NL is VERY bad D4, and a RL is less worse. And since when did everyone start crying about l-1.
Well, claim then.zimmah wrote:trust me, in this case, if the RL is me, it's worse than NLedocsil wrote:There is no strength at all. However, a NL is VERY bad D4, and a RL is less worse. And since when did everyone start crying about l-1.
I don't as well. Do you have any other other suggestions?Eldario wrote:I really don't see much strength in the case on Zimmah
I have done nothing wrong, so i wont claim just because there's a scumwagon on me.jonty125 wrote:Well, claim then.zimmah wrote:trust me, in this case, if the RL is me, it's worse than NLedocsil wrote:There is no strength at all. However, a NL is VERY bad D4, and a RL is less worse. And since when did everyone start crying about l-1.
I don't as well. Do you have any other other suggestions?Eldario wrote:I really don't see much strength in the case on Zimmah
The you are going to be hung. It isn't very complicated. Yes, it blows, but that's what happens when a game stagnates.zimmah wrote:I have done nothing wrong, so i wont claim just because there's a scumwagon on me.jonty125 wrote:Well, claim then.zimmah wrote:trust me, in this case, if the RL is me, it's worse than NLedocsil wrote:There is no strength at all. However, a NL is VERY bad D4, and a RL is less worse. And since when did everyone start crying about l-1.
I don't as well. Do you have any other other suggestions?Eldario wrote:I really don't see much strength in the case on Zimmah
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Well, I'll unvote, and if you can provide: a) a better case with a vote from yourself or b) a claim, I won't replace my vote on you in my next post.zimmah wrote:i still think we have better leads to follow, there's a lot of people getting away with not posting at all.
If you're trying to keep from claiming to be a target of scums then that statement there would make you a possible target whether you claim or not so there really isn't much point in not claiming at this point... We still have plenty of protection out there through the busdriver and the doctor.zimmah wrote:trust me, in this case, if the RL is me, it's worse than NLedocsil wrote:There is no strength at all. However, a NL is VERY bad D4, and a RL is less worse. And since when did everyone start crying about l-1.
scratch the doctor.kratos644 wrote:If you're trying to keep from claiming to be a target of scums then that statement there would make you a possible target whether you claim or not so there really isn't much point in not claiming at this point... We still have plenty of protection out there through the busdriver and the doctor.zimmah wrote:trust me, in this case, if the RL is me, it's worse than NLedocsil wrote:There is no strength at all. However, a NL is VERY bad D4, and a RL is less worse. And since when did everyone start crying about l-1.