Moderator: Cartographers
Diamonds covered in pink icingkoontz1973 wrote:What are those pink things? Flowers or glazed doughnuts.

What the map, or the diamond with pink icing?lostatlimbo wrote:I'm sorry, but yuck. Just yuck.

I think he is speaking about the colors and the way they are spray painted on. My guess. That is what I thought when I first looked.cairnswk wrote:What the map, or the diamond with pink icing?lostatlimbo wrote:I'm sorry, but yuck. Just yuck.
Help to clarify what you are yucking at lal

The pink icing ones...yes i will proabably replace them with a band of gold or something, but the others...well i don't knowkoontz1973 wrote:Having looked at this again, I will admit that the diamonds seem to be not one of your better ideas. Any chance they will come off?


koontz1973 wrote:I like the ones in the border, though they could use a little bit of love. But yes, it was the pink frosting I was on about. They just remind me of strawberry ice creams.


That's nicekoontz1973 wrote:I mean it, bloody ice creams. Had some of the best strawberry ice creams ever yesterday when we went to the Lego show with the kids yesterday.
Done...Get your band of gold on and I will kick this upstairs.





Done..13..8...and 5nolefan5311 wrote:Gameplay numbers:
Inner Suburbs looks good, but you could afford to lower it to 5. Spreadsheet indicates it should be 5.75 (see below)
Outer Suburbs looks perfect.
All Suburbs is at 15, and the spreadsheet indicates it should be at 12.42. There's 20 regions to defend, but it's only 8 regions to defend all 20 of them (the same 8 regions to defend the Outer Suburbs). I don't know if you wanted the total bonus to equal the two sub bonuses, but as is it's a little too high. Lowering each bonus by 1 to make it a total of +13, and adding a connection from Khamovniki to Ochakovo would put the suggested bonus at 13.50. That would solve those issues right there.
DoneThe South +6 needs to be reduced to a 5.
Done.And the spreadsheet indicates that the 2 +2 bonuses should be under 2, but not by much. Adding the connection from Khamovniki to Ochakovo would solve the westernmost bonus issue, but you would still have an issue with the 2 region +2.
I'm not in favour of making a 4 and a 2, so i've applied a neutral on Butyrskiy. Perhaps one should also go on Bogorodskoe?As far as the drop calculator is concerned, in 2 or 3 player games there's an 11% chance that someone drops the 2 region bonus, so you will have to code one of those start positions to be neutral, preferably Akademichesky (coding would Gagarisnkiy neutral would only leave one border region for the other +2 open). There is also a 3.24% chance that someone drops one of the 3 region +3's in the north and NW. Perhaps making one of those regions a 4 region continent and the other a 2, and coding one of the territories in the 2 region continent to start neutral would solve the problem.
What do you think?


i agree, it prohibit movementnolefan5311 wrote:Adding another neutral would solve the problem with the +3, but that's a lot of starting neutrals and could prohibit movement across the top of the map.
yes, that's a good idea, to leave Khamovniki with an army since he's got to conquer each side of him to get his bonus...he'll that fortification.Also, now that you've added the connection from Khamovniki to Ochakovo, I think you can move the starting neutral to Gagarinski.
Yeh...not really in favour of that one.What do you think about making all the inner ring territories, other than Kitaygorod, the starting neutrals instead? It would really focus the battle on the outer rings, and open up movement in the outer suburbs.
Oh! i didn't think so, it simply means A.I. and P.I. don't border Kitaygorod.Also, the border between K.I., and Kitaygorod is a little unclear.






How do you want to go about changing this?cairnswk wrote:i agree, it prohibit movementnolefan5311 wrote:Adding another neutral would solve the problem with the +3, but that's a lot of starting neutrals and could prohibit movement across the top of the map.
I'm still a little stumped on how to solve this problem. I think taking the neutral away from Khamovniki outer is a good idea, but you would need to place that neutral on Khamovniki inner, right? And I was more suggesting that the neutral be moved from Akademicheskiy to Gagarinksky, but there's still an issue of the being a pretty bad bottleneck down there. Perhaps you can drag Ochakovo all the way along the river so that it borders Yakamanka?cairnswk wrote:yes, that's a good idea, to leave Khamovniki with an army since he's got to conquer each side of him to get his bonus...he'll that fortification.nolefan5311 wrote:Also, now that you've added the connection from Khamovniki to Ochakovo, I think you can move the starting neutral to Gagarinski.
This is a very good point.cairnswk wrote:Yeh...not really in favour of that one.nolefan5311 wrote:What do you think about making all the inner ring territories, other than Kitaygorod, the starting neutrals instead? It would really focus the battle on the outer rings, and open up movement in the outer suburbs.
1. it then leave Kitaygorod at a disadvantage having to conquer neutrals to go anywhere instead of having the option to reduce an opponent's territories if possible.
2. if you have all the armies in the outer inner-ring it makes it very easy for some players to get the inner bonuses quiet quickly as they have no opponents battling to get out.
Oops. I meant the other K.I. (Krasnoselskoe inner). But that is going to need to be changed on the map, lol...can't have two K.I.'s. If you mean for it to border Kitaygorod, I think you can just open the point of it up a little bit.cairnswk wrote:Oh! i didn't think so, it simply means A.I. and P.I. don't border Kitaygorod.nolefan5311 wrote: Also, the border between K.I., and Kitaygorod is a little unclear.
Still waiting for a reply from koontz1973 on this onekoontz1973 wrote:Yes, and i had already changed that in the Outer Khamovniki territory and asked for feedback a couple of posts back.Just thought I would pop in and see. Here is a short list for you to look at but I am sure you already know these.
This is the area that I thought was great and needed copying all around.
![]()

I had a glass of organic wine, but since i am now a diabetic, my party drinking days are well over, so drunk...no...i didn't think i gave that impression or is that what you do for end of exams? Exams finished...well no...not quite...only for two weeks before i have two week block subject to do and then that exam, then three weeks after that start study period 2.Sounds like you got a little drunk for the end of exams! LOL. Congrats on being finished with them though.

Yes, that is what we did when the semester was over LOL. I know you Aussie's can drink with the best of them, so I thought maybe that was something done down under toocairnswk wrote:I had a glass of organic wine, but since i am now a diabetic, my party drinking days are well over, so drunk...no...i didn't think i gave that impression or is that what you do for end of exams? Exams finished...well no...not quite...only for two weeks before i have two week block subject to do and then that exam, then three weeks after that start study period 2.Sounds like you got a little drunk for the end of exams! LOL. Congrats on being finished with them though.![]()
i'll look at your other stuff in the morning
Oh none takennolefan5311 wrote:...
Yes, that is what we did when the semester was over LOL. I know you Aussie's can drink with the best of them, so I thought maybe that was something done down under too. Didn't mean offense.

I could split Perevo into two to make another 4.nolefan5311 wrote:How do you want to go about changing this?cairnswk wrote:i agree, it prohibit movementnolefan5311 wrote:Adding another neutral would solve the problem with the +3, but that's a lot of starting neutrals and could prohibit movement across the top of the map.
cairnswk wrote:yes, that's a good idea, to leave Khamovniki with an army since he's got to conquer each side of him to get his bonus...he'll that fortification.nolefan5311 wrote:Also, now that you've added the connection from Khamovniki to Ochakovo, I think you can move the starting neutral to Gagarinski.
yes, but i'm not in favour of that because it places too many neutrals in the inner circle.I'm still a little stumped on how to solve this problem. I think taking the neutral away from Khamovniki outer is a good idea, but you would need to place that neutral on Khamovniki inner, right?
that can be done...And I was more suggesting that the neutral be moved from Akademicheskiy to Gagarinksky,
Last line...no. there is already cramped space down there and that would only add to doubt questions.but there's still an issue of the being a pretty bad bottleneck down there. Perhaps you can drag Ochakovo all the way along the river so that it borders Yakamanka?
cairnswk wrote:Oh! i didn't think so, it simply means A.I. and P.I. don't border Kitaygorod.nolefan5311 wrote: Also, the border between K.I., and Kitaygorod is a little unclear.
Oh OK, i can fix that. didn't even see it.Oops. I meant the other K.I. (Krasnoselskoe inner). But that is going to need to be changed on the map, lol...can't have two K.I.'s. If you mean for it to border Kitaygorod, I think you can just open the point of it up a little bit.
