Moderator: Community Team
Gah. You troll.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Rofl.aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Stickies!! Yay!!strike wolf wrote:This is something the moderators discussed and decided would segment the forum. I would be all for sticking games that are in sign ups to the upcoming games thread, if we could keep it updated.
Someone has missed quite a bit. x3pmchugh wrote:Rofl.aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.

IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.safariguy5 wrote:Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Watch out guys, I'm detecting sarcasm!shieldgenerator7 wrote:IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.safariguy5 wrote:Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Indeed, because we know that EVERYONE who enters the mafia forum will read the handbook first. Just like EVERYONE who posts in GD reads the community guidelines first.shieldgenerator7 wrote:IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.safariguy5 wrote:Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.

what do you mean, Community Guidelines? and why would we want a Mafia Handbook. no one should even bother writing one.safariguy5 wrote:Indeed, because we know that EVERYONE who enters the mafia forum will read the handbook first. Just like EVERYONE who posts in GD reads the community guidelines first.shieldgenerator7 wrote:IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.safariguy5 wrote:Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.

funnily enough, yesterday i put ++ tags on my game, and today it is up from 2/9 to 4/9...TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Is it really so hard to distinguish filled and non-filled games? Do we really think that adding ++ tags will raise the sign-up rates? ffs people, if your game isn't filling it's probably because there are too many games or nobody wants to join it.
I'm assuming y'all have eyes and basic comprehension abilities. Use them.
-Tails

Well, maybe add ++++++++++ next time, you'll have 14 playersvodean wrote:funnily enough, yesterday i put ++ tags on my game, and today it is up from 2/9 to 4/9...TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Is it really so hard to distinguish filled and non-filled games? Do we really think that adding ++ tags will raise the sign-up rates? ffs people, if your game isn't filling it's probably because there are too many games or nobody wants to join it.
I'm assuming y'all have eyes and basic comprehension abilities. Use them.
-Tails
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Lol, correlation does not equal causation.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Nice! They do work afterall
(I like a good case of confirmatin bias)
-SG7 ()

or the game is ongoing and one person has died.Yomiel wrote:It all blends together. When you see threads with stuff like "12/13", that would suggest one more player is needed.

Thank you for sharing this valuable information.Yomiel wrote:Nowhere else but here. Even forums with Queue sections usually just use that kind of thing for games in sign-ups.