Ok seriously, I can't tell if Vodeon and Yomiel are having a tea party or if they are really starting cases on each other.
I don't see any legitimate cases going on right now or are we just trying to pressure the slightest abnormality because we have nothing else? Even though Yomiel is saying that his vote is serious, I can't help but take it as tongue-in-cheek because it doesn't make any sense if it is serious. I think Vodeon is just being obnoxious, so it's hard to take anything he says seriously either.
---
I just re-read the rules and realized that we're on a tight schedule. . .so pressure away!
I voted for him because he kept bouncing his vote around. As for the votes against me, I think they're all joke votes. No one has made any case again me that I can recall.
i dont even know how to respond to the case against me... yeah, maybe i kept joking too long, but i dont see how that can be considered scummy. as for the yomiel vote - and perhaps this part IS scummy - i feel as though a yomiel vote justifies itself.
so pressure me if you want - we do need to get on to some cases before deadline, but i think that at the current time, pressuring yomiel is equally justified.
<NoSurvivors› then vote chuck for being an info whore
Yomiel wrote:I voted for him because he kept bouncing his vote around. As for the votes against me, I think they're all joke votes. No one has made any case again me that I can recall.
vodean wrote:i dont even know how to respond to the case against me... yeah, maybe i kept joking too long, but i dont see how that can be considered scummy. as for the yomiel vote - and perhaps this part IS scummy - i feel as though a yomiel vote justifies itself.
While I don't really know exactly how you should have responded to this case against you, I do feel that what you have done is a pretty poor job. My initial vote against you wasn't all that serious, but your responses give me no reason to move it now that there is a serious enough case against you. At this point should you desire to not be lynched you need to get serious and either somehow post a great defense, or just consider claiming sooner rather than later, allowing us enough time before the deadline to actually pursue another case if we decide not to lynch you after all.
It must be a joke, because the only possible answer is this:
zimmah wrote:unvote vote yomiel for the following rock solid reasons:
1) he used a too bright color for voting once
2) his avatar, coupled with the question mark remind me of the joker from batman
3) why so serious?
4) i believe there's more but i forgot.
vodean wrote:i dont even know how to respond to the case against me... yeah, maybe i kept joking too long, but i dont see how that can be considered scummy. as for the yomiel vote - and perhaps this part IS scummy - i feel as though a yomiel vote justifies itself.
While I don't really know exactly how you should have responded to this case against you, I do feel that what you have done is a pretty poor job. My initial vote against you wasn't all that serious, but your responses give me no reason to move it now that there is a serious enough case against you. At this point should you desire to not be lynched you need to get serious and either somehow post a great defense, or just consider claiming sooner rather than later, allowing us enough time before the deadline to actually pursue another case if we decide not to lynch you after all.
ok... cool down. ask someone who knows me if this fits my meta. then present the case in a nice, succinct (preferably bulleted) fashion, and then i will defend myself. if you feel that my defense in inadequate, i shall claim. if we have enough time after that, we can pursue another case. but seriously. what kind of scum would push themselves as mafia godfather? and then vote-jump and case jump like that? just sayin.
again though. give me the case, and i will give you the defense.
<NoSurvivors› then vote chuck for being an info whore
happyfeet wrote:unvote vote spiesr because you were the last one to post
We are currently crawling towards actual discussion. It would be nice if you would join us and contribute in a meaningful way instead of just continuing to make jokes.
vodean wrote:i dont even know how to respond to the case against me... yeah, maybe i kept joking too long, but i dont see how that can be considered scummy. as for the yomiel vote - and perhaps this part IS scummy - i feel as though a yomiel vote justifies itself.
While I don't really know exactly how you should have responded to this case against you, I do feel that what you have done is a pretty poor job. My initial vote against you wasn't all that serious, but your responses give me no reason to move it now that there is a serious enough case against you. At this point should you desire to not be lynched you need to get serious and either somehow post a great defense, or just consider claiming sooner rather than later, allowing us enough time before the deadline to actually pursue another case if we decide not to lynch you after all.
ok... cool down. ask someone who knows me if this fits my meta. then present the case in a nice, succinct (preferably bulleted) fashion, and then i will defend myself. if you feel that my defense in inadequate, i shall claim. if we have enough time after that, we can pursue another case. but seriously. what kind of scum would push themselves as mafia godfather? and then vote-jump and case jump like that? just sayin.
again though. give me the case, and i will give you the defense.
One who would perhaps use this as a defense? While highly unlikely it by no means is useable as an alibi. If you are experienced as you claim with your "Meta" then doing this is darn right stupid and all it does is raise red flags. WIFOM can be a double edged sword.
happyfeet wrote:unvote vote spiesr because you were the last one to post
We are currently crawling towards actual discussion. It would be nice if you would join us and contribute in a meaningful way instead of just continuing to make jokes.
Unvote vote spiesr ... jokevote stage is designed to bring out scumminess. Jokevote stage is officially over (for me anyway). That was one of the scummiest comments I've seen in a long time. Defensive, unnecessary, finger-pointy, pious, rediculous, smarmy, high-flalutent, finger-pointing, obfuscatory, all round scummy. The Vodean and Ymiel stuff is fluff but your response is scum on the nose. You want discussion? Discuss!
) --- it's got SHIELDS!
i think an inactive is probably our best bet.
