Moderator: Community Team

pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Yeah sure, sounds fun, PM me some time.vodean wrote:if all the factions were trying to kill a single, better-informed, but smaller mafia, as well as eachother, it could work. i would love to try and help out and toy with the ideas. we could also bring in a real-life scenario (i have a few in mind). it may be a little less like mafia, but should be fun to play nonetheless. if you will have me of course.

thats funnysafariguy5 wrote:Unbalanced doesn't really matter, I'd play and propose ridiculous bills. PR's anyone?
If you're not on the imba team you won't have fun, though. Losing because of balance issues is just a serious pain. If you win, you will have fun though, if only to gloat your victory.DiM wrote:as long as everybody has fun doing it who cares if it's unbalanced or too far away from the classic mafia?
i have no idea what an imba team is.aage wrote:If you're not on the imba team you won't have fun, though. Losing because of balance issues is just a serious pain. If you win, you will have fun though, if only to gloat your victory.DiM wrote:as long as everybody has fun doing it who cares if it's unbalanced or too far away from the classic mafia?
imba is an acronym for imbalanced. So if you're in the underpowered team, you're gonna have a bad time.DiM wrote:i have no idea what an imba team is.aage wrote:If you're not on the imba team you won't have fun, though. Losing because of balance issues is just a serious pain. If you win, you will have fun though, if only to gloat your victory.DiM wrote:as long as everybody has fun doing it who cares if it's unbalanced or too far away from the classic mafia?
but anyway, even if i lose because of balance issues that doesn't stop me from having fun. simply participating and analyzing and coming up with long theories about who's who and what we should do is fun enough for me.
through night actions people die. then each side is trying to take full control over the government perhaps.aage wrote:imba is an acronym for imbalanced. So if you're in the underpowered team, you're gonna have a bad time.DiM wrote:i have no idea what an imba team is.aage wrote:If you're not on the imba team you won't have fun, though. Losing because of balance issues is just a serious pain. If you win, you will have fun though, if only to gloat your victory.DiM wrote:as long as everybody has fun doing it who cares if it's unbalanced or too far away from the classic mafia?
but anyway, even if i lose because of balance issues that doesn't stop me from having fun. simply participating and analyzing and coming up with long theories about who's who and what we should do is fun enough for me.
I have a question on the idea though, /, you give examples of issues people can vote on, but I wonder how that would work. Everyone has a vote, so the town (everyone, since there seems to be a lack of scum) votes on things but no-one dies. How does the game end?

pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
dude you have no idea just how true all of those are/ wrote:A mix sounds good to me, it would shift focus away from the name claim aspect of the game.
I still want Soviet Russia jokes though...
In Soviet Russia, snowball throws you!
In Russia, mafia IS town!
In Soviet Russia, polls vote for you!
I'll make another poll if cold war wins.

I like the cold war/make your own faction mix. Voted for Faction, but I also support Cold War./ wrote:A mix sounds good to me, it would shift focus away from the name claim aspect of the game.
I still want Soviet Russia jokes though...
In Soviet Russia, snowball throws you!
In Russia, mafia IS town!
In Soviet Russia, polls vote for you!
I'll make another poll if cold war wins.
