Moderator: Community Team




And in your ten posts, you've voted for four different players, nearly half the number that are playing. Need I remind you that it is the content of a player's post that is important, not the number. And besides, I would contest that I've done more useful scumhunting in my three have than you have in your ten. How does flip flopping as you call it help the town?thehippo8 wrote:So that leaves militant and IB on even stevens at the least involvement (ok so Chuck is lower by one post but given he wasn't in the game until later I wasn't counting him .... yet!). Medefe said "let's get the game started" so my vote returns to ... unvote vote militant.
Let's get the game rolling!

Whilst I completely agree with you re flip-flopping and quality of posts, I am also concerned that:militant wrote:And in your ten posts, you've voted for four different players, nearly half the number that are playing. Need I remind you that it is the content of a player's post that is important, not the number. And besides, I would contest that I've done more useful scumhunting in my three have than you have in your ten. How does flip flopping as you call it help the town?thehippo8 wrote:So that leaves militant and IB on even stevens at the least involvement (ok so Chuck is lower by one post but given he wasn't in the game until later I wasn't counting him .... yet!). Medefe said "let's get the game started" so my vote returns to ... unvote vote militant.
Let's get the game rolling!


Quite right, but it's always better to go on something than on nothing. Even if the something is so flimsy that it disappears as soon as you throw a second glance its way. The "random pressure"-method has this uncanny tendency of always targeting a towny in my experience.DiM wrote:we do need to get something going.
putting some pressure on somebody might give us something to work with.
sitting around not posting and waiting for the deadline can only help mafia.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
So, you are clearing militant then?MeDeFe wrote:Quite right, but it's always better to go on something than on nothing. Even if the something is so flimsy that it disappears as soon as you throw a second glance its way. The "random pressure"-method has this uncanny tendency of always targeting a towny in my experience.DiM wrote:we do need to get something going.
putting some pressure on somebody might give us something to work with.
sitting around not posting and waiting for the deadline can only help mafia.
Right now I'd be leaning towards pressuring thehippo, because, even when accounting for joke votes, 5 different people voted for in 9 posts is a lot.


meta or not flip-flopping votes is still scummythehippo8 wrote: Whilst I completely agree with you re flip-flopping and quality of posts, I am also concerned that:
- You have to account for joke voting on day one
- My Meta has always been to flop about - particularly on day one - so it would be weird (for me at least) if I didn't do that
- The way people respond when being voted is the best way of getting scum tells - and that helps town!
- Being silent doesn't help anyone
- Being purely defensive is not offering anything useful to the game (otehr than scumtelling) or to town
- Small games like this need to be played - get off the tread-mill!
yeah, that's because there are always more townies than mafia.MeDeFe wrote:The "random pressure"-method has this uncanny tendency of always targeting a towny in my experience.

I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

vodean wrote:Vote Count 1.3
Lovo - 1 (neb)
MeDeFe - 1 (mili)
Hippo - 2 (chuck, neb)
militant - 1 (hippo)
Not voting - 4
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline is set for Wednesday, 25th of July.
It's not a conclusion ... it's a question! Are you going to answer it?MeDeFe wrote:I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?


In order: no, yes.thehippo8 wrote:It's not a conclusion ... it's a question! Are you going to answer it?MeDeFe wrote:I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Ya, I didn't get how you were even coming to this question...How did you think MeDeFe was clearing militant?thehippo8 wrote:It's not a conclusion ... it's a question! Are you going to answer it?MeDeFe wrote:I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?
Because rather than respond to what I said, Medefe simply proceeds to grumble about my day one flopping and jokevotes. I have returned to militant and explained why. I appreciate what y'all say about my day one floppiness and if you don't like it I won't do it in future games. I thought it was funny but clearly I was the joke! Lol. Anyway, can we deal with the militant or IB issue now?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Ya, I didn't get how you were even coming to this question...How did you think MeDeFe was clearing militant?thehippo8 wrote:It's not a conclusion ... it's a question! Are you going to answer it?MeDeFe wrote:I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?


We can deal with your flip-flopping.thehippo8 wrote:Because rather than respond to what I said, Medefe simply proceeds to grumble about my day one flopping and jokevotes. I have returned to militant and explained why. I appreciate what y'all say about my day one floppiness and if you don't like it I won't do it in future games. I thought it was funny but clearly I was the joke! Lol. Anyway, can we deal with the militant or IB issue now?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Ya, I didn't get how you were even coming to this question...How did you think MeDeFe was clearing militant?thehippo8 wrote:It's not a conclusion ... it's a question! Are you going to answer it?MeDeFe wrote:I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Umm...what's the militant and Iron issue?thehippo8 wrote:Because rather than respond to what I said, Medefe simply proceeds to grumble about my day one flopping and jokevotes. I have returned to militant and explained why. I appreciate what y'all say about my day one floppiness and if you don't like it I won't do it in future games. I thought it was funny but clearly I was the joke! Lol. Anyway, can we deal with the militant or IB issue now?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Ya, I didn't get how you were even coming to this question...How did you think MeDeFe was clearing militant?thehippo8 wrote:It's not a conclusion ... it's a question! Are you going to answer it?MeDeFe wrote:I don't see how you reached this conclusion...thehippo8 wrote:So, you are clearing militant then?
thehippo8 wrote:Whilst I completely agree with you re flip-flopping and quality of posts, I am also concerned that:militant wrote:And in your ten posts, you've voted for four different players, nearly half the number that are playing. Need I remind you that it is the content of a player's post that is important, not the number. And besides, I would contest that I've done more useful scumhunting in my three have than you have in your ten. How does flip flopping as you call it help the town?thehippo8 wrote:So that leaves militant and IB on even stevens at the least involvement (ok so Chuck is lower by one post but given he wasn't in the game until later I wasn't counting him .... yet!). Medefe said "let's get the game started" so my vote returns to ... unvote vote militant.
Let's get the game rolling!
- You have to account for joke voting on day one
- My Meta has always been to flop about - particularly on day one - so it would be weird (for me at least) if I didn't do that
- The way people respond when being voted is the best way of getting scum tells - and that helps town!
- Being silent doesn't help anyone
- Being purely defensive is not offering anything useful to the game (otehr than scumtelling) or to town
- Small games like this need to be played - get off the tread-mill!




This doesn't explain how you thought I was in any way clearing militant, though. So, yes, I'm keeping my vote on you.thehippo8 wrote:@ Neb ... this ...
Spoiler
thehippo8 wrote:Whilst I completely agree with you re flip-flopping and quality of posts, I am also concerned that:militant wrote:And in your ten posts, you've voted for four different players, nearly half the number that are playing. Need I remind you that it is the content of a player's post that is important, not the number. And besides, I would contest that I've done more useful scumhunting in my three have than you have in your ten. How does flip flopping as you call it help the town?thehippo8 wrote:So that leaves militant and IB on even stevens at the least involvement (ok so Chuck is lower by one post but given he wasn't in the game until later I wasn't counting him .... yet!). Medefe said "let's get the game started" so my vote returns to ... unvote vote militant.
Let's get the game rolling!
- You have to account for joke voting on day one
- My Meta has always been to flop about - particularly on day one - so it would be weird (for me at least) if I didn't do that
- The way people respond when being voted is the best way of getting scum tells - and that helps town!
- Being silent doesn't help anyone
- Being purely defensive is not offering anything useful to the game (otehr than scumtelling) or to town
- Small games like this need to be played - get off the tread-mill!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.