Bigoted Organization "Chic-Fil-A" infiltrates facebook

[Juan_Bottom]

I agree with Night Strike here. They're your run-of-the-mill American Conservative Christian family. When Muppet & Co pulled out of their toy promotion, "Chic-Fil-A" turned around and lied about it because they were embarrassed. No, they weren't embarrassed to lose the muppets. These typical Conservative Christians were embarrassed of the reason they lost the muppets, and they are afraid to expose themselves as the haters that they are.



THOU SHALT LIE AND HATE GAY PEOPLE LIKE JESUS SAID


Chic-Fil-a donated almost $2 million dollars to hate groups in 2009 -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/0 ... 69429.html

[Juan_Bottom]

Hating homosexuals or being opposed to Homosexual marriage has nothing to do with Christianity. Here's why:

In the Old Testament, God commands you to *murder homosexuals. So why don't Christians follow through? Because they say that Jesus came to replace Old Testament laws or whatever. Other laws that were replaced include eating shellfish and shaving. And yet Jesus never said anything about homosexuality or opposing Gay Marriage, negating their excuse of being Christianly.
So people who use the Bible to justify their hatred towards homosexual equality are actually just exposing their own lack of belief or knowledge of the Bible. How can you use the Bible as a shield to protect you from being exposed as a bigot? You're pretty much putting words into Jesus' mouth to justify your hate-loving position, which sounds like something the devil would do.


*

If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.

[Dibbun]

Who cares what the leader of a restaurant says about politics? Do you need to have your business leaders agree with your every opinion? What do their opinions have to do with the quality of their product?

I would be impressed if young liberal douchebags would take a stance against diamonds - since mercantilism is so destructive of an economic system that the United States fought a war of independence to overthrow it - in order to help Africa develop itself into a modern capitalistic civilization.

But nah, much easier to promote the gays, who have a fine standard of living, instead of people far away who may not even exist anyway, plus they're black so who cares....

[InkL0sed]

I've never even heard of them before.

Why is it somehow cool to intentionally misspell something for no reason? Like, I get if it's supposedly clever by making a pun, but this is like replacing "s" with "z". There's no point. What does dumbass creative spelling do for you?

The only one doing the misspelling is Juan. The company is NOT named "Chic-Fil-A".

How is that a correct spelling? Are you honestly under the impression it's spelled "Fil-A"?

[Juan_Bottom]

I'm against diamonds and won't buy any, irregardless of certificates. I know a few other libs like me, though I admit that I also know one that cowed to his fiancee's demands and bought Canadian.


Why is this important?
It's important because now you know what the company does with the money that you give it. They spend it on hate groups. & they also spend your money on Muppet recall signs that hide the fact that they are bigots themselves. You're indirectly financing these hate groups just like you want us to stop indirectly financing war by buying diamonds.

[Dibbun]

I'm against diamonds and won't buy any, irregardless of certificates. I know a few other libs like me, though I admit that I also know one that cowed to his fiancee's demands and bought Canadian.


Why is this important?
It's important because now you know what the company does with the money that you give it. They spend it on hate groups. & they also spend your money on Muppet recall signs that hide the fact that they are bigots themselves. You're indirectly financing these hate groups just like you want us to stop indirectly financing war by buying diamonds.

Hate groups? If you oppose gay marriage you're a hate group? I think you're being dramatic.

[Juan_Bottom]

There's no rational or scientific reason to oppose gay marriage.

[xeno]

If you havent had chicfila do yourself a favor and get the spicy chicken sandwich and smother the chicfila sauce all over it. Well see how much you give a shit about gay marriages after you eat that beautiful creation this restaurant has given us.

[Phatscotty]

But there is a reason to have our own opinion, and express it. and btw, I for the life of me do not see how thinking that marriage should be what it always has been since the beginning of time, is "bigoted". But if you want to see some REAL bigotry, just look at the reactions to Chic-fil-a simply expressing traditional values.

What is your reason for trying to be the thought police? Tell everyone how to think? Shame people and tear them down in order to build your agenda, based on where a minority of people like to stick their pecker or rub their vag against? Really, this should be the most personal of personal issues.

This crap is starting to get sickening

[Army of GOD]

Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

Intolerance: lack of toleration; unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect contrary opinions or beliefs, persons of different races or backgrounds, etc.

Pretty open and shut case to be honest. By opposing gay marriage you are being a bigot; sure its only a minor offence as far as the wider area of bigotry is concerned (I for one am glad you arent going out every night and beating the shit out of suspected fags NS), but it is bigotry nonetheless.

Yes this definition pretty makes everyone on CC OT forums a bigot (except for me, Im pretty much an angel) but it is what it is.

Let's run with this. As you've implied, according to those definitions then anyone opposed to fascism or Nazism is also a bigot. They'd be a bigot for good reasons in my opinion, but they'd be a bigot nonetheless.

So, then we'd have argue about who is a "good bigot" and who is a "bad bigot."

Henceforth, all accusations of bigotry should include "good" or "bad" before the word "bigotry/bigot."

Excellent work, Lootifer.

hey look, you guys are restating things that IVE ALREADY MENTIONED IN OFF-TROPICS


anyway, I still find it hilarious that people still take Sunday off for religious reasons. I mean, I like taking sundays off so I can golf or watch football, but it'll be a hilarious coincidence when one of these people get injured but can't go to the ER because no one's allowed to work on Sundays.

[Phatscotty]

Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

Intolerance: lack of toleration; unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect contrary opinions or beliefs, persons of different races or backgrounds, etc.

Pretty open and shut case to be honest. By opposing gay marriage you are being a bigot; sure its only a minor offence as far as the wider area of bigotry is concerned (I for one am glad you arent going out every night and beating the shit out of suspected fags NS), but it is bigotry nonetheless.

Yes this definition pretty makes everyone on CC OT forums a bigot (except for me, Im pretty much an angel) but it is what it is.

Let's run with this. As you've implied, according to those definitions then anyone opposed to fascism or Nazism is also a bigot. They'd be a bigot for good reasons in my opinion, but they'd be a bigot nonetheless.

So, then we'd have argue about who is a "good bigot" and who is a "bad bigot."

Henceforth, all accusations of bigotry should include "good" or "bad" before the word "bigotry/bigot."

Excellent work, Lootifer.

hey look, you guys are restating things that IVE ALREADY MENTIONED IN OFF-TROPICS


anyway, I still find it hilarious that people still take Sunday off for religious reasons. I mean, I like taking sundays off so I can golf or watch football, but it'll be a hilarious coincidence when one of these people get injured but can't go to the ER because no one's allowed to work on Sundays.

We have enough Godless heathens to cover their shifts, so long as they don't also refuse to work on Sundays so they can still watch their favorite football team play a game.

[Night Strike]

I'm against diamonds and won't buy any, irregardless of certificates. I know a few other libs like me, though I admit that I also know one that cowed to his fiancee's demands and bought Canadian.


Why is this important?
It's important because now you know what the company does with the money that you give it. They spend it on hate groups. & they also spend your money on Muppet recall signs that hide the fact that they are bigots themselves. You're indirectly financing these hate groups just like you want us to stop indirectly financing war by buying diamonds.

Hate groups? If you oppose gay marriage you're a hate group? I think you're being dramatic.

Modus operandi for many of the militant atheist liberals who reside on CC.

Hating homosexuals or being opposed to Homosexual marriage has nothing to do with Christianity. Here's why:

In the Old Testament, God commands you to *murder homosexuals. So why don't Christians follow through? Because they say that Jesus came to replace Old Testament laws or whatever. Other laws that were replaced include eating shellfish and shaving. And yet Jesus never said anything about homosexuality or opposing Gay Marriage, negating their excuse of being Christianly.
So people who use the Bible to justify their hatred towards homosexual equality are actually just exposing their own lack of belief or knowledge of the Bible. How can you use the Bible as a shield to protect you from being exposed as a bigot? You're pretty much putting words into Jesus' mouth to justify your hate-loving position, which sounds like something the devil would do.


*

If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.

Actually, Jesus himself clearly affirmed that marriage is only between one man and one woman. He didn't outright make a statement condemning homosexuality (although Paul did) because he clearly defined the only marriage that is Biblically valid.

[Army of GOD]

also, if you "oppose gay marriage" because you disagree with it, then you have no right to scream "bigots!" when someone disagrees with your disagreement.

[Haggis_McMutton]

But there is a reason to have our own opinion, and express it. and btw, I for the life of me do not see how thinking that marriage should be what it always has been since the beginning of time[citation_needed], is "bigoted".
But if you want to see some REAL bigotry, just look at the reactions to Chic-fil-a simply expressing traditional values [citation_needed].

What is your reason for trying to be the thought police? Tell everyone how to think? Shame people and tear them down in order to build your agenda, based on where a minority of people like to stick their pecker or rub their vag against? Really, this should be the most personal of personal issues.

Let me debate this in the style you would debate it if you were in the opposing position.
*Ahem*

Yo, Scotty, like freedom, you heard of it?

[rdsrds2120]

Who cares what the leader of a restaurant says about politics? Do you need to have your business leaders agree with your every opinion? What do their opinions have to do with the quality of their product?

Isn't that a part of the influence of a free market? Consumer-coporate relationships?

Dibbun, YOU DON'T HATE AMERICA, DO YOU??!?

-rd

[Phatscotty]

But there is a reason to have our own opinion, and express it. and btw, I for the life of me do not see how thinking that marriage should be what it always has been since the beginning of time[citation_needed], is "bigoted".
But if you want to see some REAL bigotry, just look at the reactions to Chic-fil-a simply expressing traditional values [citation_needed].

What is your reason for trying to be the thought police? Tell everyone how to think? Shame people and tear them down in order to build your agenda, based on where a minority of people like to stick their pecker or rub their vag against? Really, this should be the most personal of personal issues.

Let me debate this in the style you would debate it if you were in the opposing position.
*Ahem*

Yo, Scotty, like freedom, you heard of it?

I heard Chic-Fil-A had expressed it's Freedom recently...yes

[Phatscotty]

[Lootifer]

I got to 4:12 before I couldnt take any more of his terrible analogy, and annoyingly slow delivery.

But it's easy to see where his argument is going.

And his argument would be valid, very valid indeed, if every supporter of traditional marriage - when faced with a vote where they had the following choices: 1) Yes to gay marriage, 2) No to gay marriage or 3) Walk away and dont vote - chose 3).

But tell me PS; how would you vote? How would NS/Dibbun/other supporters of traditional marriage vote?

Since it is a binary vote; by chosing either option, you are directly opressing the other option. Its fact of binary logic; they have a whole concept dedicated to it; its called opportunity cost.

I admit that by voting 1) I am opressing traditional marriage; but thats because in my opinion traditional marriage doesnt provide any additional social value over and above marriage where anyone, regardless of sexuality, has access to it.

Why cant you guys accept the same thing when you vote for option 2)?

[Army of GOD]

I got to 4:12 before I couldnt take any more of his terrible analogy, and annoyingly slow delivery.

But it's easy to see where his argument is going.

And his argument would be valid, very valid indeed, if every supporter of traditional marriage - when faced with a vote where they had the following choices: 1) Yes to gay marriage, 2) No to gay marriage or 3) Walk away and dont vote - chose 3).

But tell me PS; how would you vote? How would NS/Dibbun/other supporters of traditional marriage vote?

Since it is a binary vote; by chosing either option, you are directly opressing the other option. Its fact of binary logic; they have a whole concept dedicated to it; its called opportunity cost.

I admit that by voting 1) I am opressing traditional marriage; but thats because in my opinion traditional marriage doesnt provide any additional social value over and above marriage where anyone, regardless of sexuality, has access to it.

Why cant you guys accept the same thing when you vote for option 2)?

logic is for communists and blacks

[Haggis_McMutton]

I heard Chic-Fil-A had expressed it's Freedom recently...yes

So it's only the gays and the liberals who you don;t like expressing their freedom, gotcha.

P.S. Fyi there's this thing called polygamy. I hear it's been happening since forever.

[Woodruff]

I would be impressed if young liberal douchebags would take a stance against diamonds - since mercantilism is so destructive of an economic system that the United States fought a war of independence to overthrow it - in order to help Africa develop itself into a modern capitalistic civilization.

Many liberals are VERY against the diamond market, actually.

[Woodruff]

But there is a reason to have our own opinion, and express it. and btw, I for the life of me do not see how thinking that marriage should be what it always has been since the beginning of time, is "bigoted".

If marriagne had been what you believe it to be for that long, then perhaps you might have a valid argument. But it hasn't even been remotely that, so you really don't.

[Woodruff]

Wait...Phatscotty, are you actually claiming that THE FREE MARKET WORKING AS IT'S DESIGNED TO is intolerance?

[BigBallinStalin]

Who cares what the leader of a restaurant says about politics? Do you need to have your business leaders agree with your every opinion? What do their opinions have to do with the quality of their product?

I dunno, something about political donations and your money going to such donations indirectly.

I would be impressed if young liberal douchebags would take a stance against diamonds - since mercantilism is so destructive of an economic system that the United States fought a war of independence to overthrow it - in order to help Africa develop itself into a modern capitalistic civilization.

This isn't true. The US--federal government--engaged in mercantilist policies for decades until roughly the 1960s/1970s.

Arguably, the US still engages in mercantalist policies regarding its monopoly over US currency. This is evident through its repeated devaluation and the beneficial consequences of inflation---i.e. if the US dollar becomes relatively less in value, then exports to foreign countries become cheaper. (This is pretty much what China does with its currency, albeit through a different means of control. Nevertheless, all countries which rely on floating exchange rates do this (UK, GER, FRA, ITA, etc. etc.).

But nah, much easier to promote the gays, who have a fine standard of living, instead of people far away who may not even exist anyway, plus they're black so who cares....

Relative standards of living, which are in the aggregate, don't justify oppressing a particular group of people.

[BigBallinStalin]

If you havent had chicfila do yourself a favor and get the spicy chicken sandwich and smother the chicfila sauce all over it. Well see how much you give a shit about gay marriages after you eat that beautiful creation this restaurant has given us.

I agree with the sentiments and logical arguments leveled against the Chick-Fil-A's president (or whoever)'s stance of gay marriage; however, such a stance and the political donations are only a portion of the costs associated with purchasing Chick Fil A's products.

With xeno, it's still the case that the benefits offset the costs (anti-gay marriage stance included), and to me... although I disagree with this decision, it is still within their rights to continue purchasing Chick Fil A products.