Moderator: Community Team
Maybe it's due to people substituting "let's get down to brass tacks" with a more concise phrase.jonesthecurl wrote:Nobody's mentioned anything but the stupid phrase.
Why is it suddenly so popular?
Was it coined by some popular "hero"?
>Posts a video which opens with "let's get real"Phatscotty wrote:I've haven't heard it once lately,jonesthecurl wrote:Nobody's mentioned anything but the stupid phrase.
Why is it suddenly so popular?
Was it coined by some popular "hero"?
Hmm..... you oppose anything hinting of socialized medicine, but cannot be bothered to even look at places that have such systems (actually say what they do is utterly irrelevant to us).Phatscotty wrote:you know that's a lie!PLAYER57832 wrote:Well, you sure are a big proponent of "If I don't like it... shut it down or ridicule it".Phatscotty wrote:
Is diversity of thought being shut down?
....
rdsrds2120 wrote:>Posts a video which opens with "let's get real"Phatscotty wrote:I've haven't heard it once lately,jonesthecurl wrote:Nobody's mentioned anything but the stupid phrase.
Why is it suddenly so popular?
Was it coined by some popular "hero"?
>Says he hasn't heard it once lately
gimme a break dude, I got a lot of tables... Se we can lump both you and Savage in an airtight container with Alex Jones? Not that I would.....but we could.saxitoxin wrote:I don't think you're a NeoCon, Scott. Nor are you a Libertarian.Phatscotty wrote:Hmm. Well, I wonder about this though. I have been called a Neo-con many times here, mostly by the leftists but also Greekdog and some others on the right. Is your exampled context that same context in which they are speaking? Because I know I have never said or even seen a thing here mentioned genocide against Serbia. I don't think that's what they mean.saxitoxin wrote:I think Neo-Cons generally supported the genocide against Serbia. Michael Savage has repeatedly called the genocide against the Serb people a "war crime." He called for George W. Bush's squeeze-toy, Tony Blair, to be shackled and paraded in front of a war crimes tribunal in The Hague, and 17 days later he was banned from entering the UK for life by the Minister of State Security.Phatscotty wrote:Neo-cons hate Glenn Beck's guts. Very, very old news....Frigidus wrote:I'm not exactly a fan of Michael Savage, but his assessment of Glenn Beck is correct. Beck sure knows how to spend a lot of time saying very little.saxitoxin wrote: Michael Savage on Glenn Beck -
What I am getting at here is the "new" definition of Neo-Con, as it is used today. for me, today, I would say neo-con means bigger military, more intervention around the globe, a hard line stance with Israel (somewhat), big gov't, big spending, big debt, pro-military industrial complex, et al
You're on an ideological journey that will probably end with a shootout with the ATF.
Alex Jones! Love him. He's in deeper on Homeland Security's payroll than Hal Turner was ... or Glenn Beck or Luke Rudkowski are -Phatscotty wrote: Se we can lump both you and Savage in an airtight container with Alex Jones? Not that I would.....but we could.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Trying to hang...saxitoxin wrote:Alex Jones! Love him. He's in deeper on Homeland Security's payroll than Hal Turner was ... or Glenn Beck or Luke Rudkowski are -Phatscotty wrote: Se we can lump both you and Savage in an airtight container with Alex Jones? Not that I would.....but we could.
Are you a cannibal?Lootifer wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
And hes got me nailed perfectly. I nearly always judge christians on the surface as soon as I realise they are christian.
Christians are almost always good wholesome people who care a huge amount about the well being of others.
Thats what he meant right?
Glenn Beck "gave" over 40 million dollars to the gov't last year. that is a pretty big share of provisioning.BigBallinStalin wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
lol whoopsNeoteny wrote:Glenn Beck "gave" over 40 million dollars to the gov't last year. that is a pretty big share of provisioning.Army of GOD wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
Just curious, how much did you chip in last year? Did you generate over 100 more taxpaying jobs? How many semi's of food did you fill "for the poor"?
Thats my quote so ill assume you're addressing me.Phatscotty wrote:Glenn Beck "gave" over 40 million dollars to the gov't last year. that is a pretty big share of provisioning.BigBallinStalin wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
Just curious, how much did you chip in last year? Did you generate over 100 more taxpaying jobs? How many semi's of food did you fill "for the poor"?
Source? Cos that seems suspiciously like his annual revenue when I put 40 million and Glenn Beck into Google.Phatscotty wrote:Glenn Beck "gave" over 40 million dollars to the gov't last year. that is a pretty big share of provisioning.BigBallinStalin wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
Just curious, how much did you chip in last year? Did you generate over 100 more taxpaying jobs? How many semi's of food did you fill "for the poor"?
You also made a point about provisions for the poor, which is specifically what my response about "food for the poor" and "tax dollars that go to the poor/provisions". I did not respond to anything to do with your jig on Christ. I just pointed out that when it comes to helping the poor, that is one thing you cannot say Glenn Beck does not do, because he does. In fact, anyone who would say something like that does not know enough about Glenn Beck to have an opinion about being for or "against greater provisioning for the poor"Lootifer wrote:Thats my quote so ill assume you're addressing me.Phatscotty wrote:Glenn Beck "gave" over 40 million dollars to the gov't last year. that is a pretty big share of provisioning.BigBallinStalin wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
Just curious, how much did you chip in last year? Did you generate over 100 more taxpaying jobs? How many semi's of food did you fill "for the poor"?
I dont understand how Mr Becks tax bill relates to my point that claiming christians are persecuted is absurd. Care to explain? You seem to have cherry picked the wrong part of my post.
But you have no source to back up you claims? Did you just make it up?Phatscotty wrote:You also made a point about provisions for the poor, which is specifically what my response about "food for the poor" and "tax dollars that go to the poor/provisions". I did not respond to anything to do with your jig on Christ. I just pointed out that when it comes to helping the poor, that is one thing you cannot say Glenn Beck does not do, because he does. In fact, anyone who would say something like that does not know enough about Glenn Beck to have an opinion about being for or "against greater provisioning for the poor"Lootifer wrote:Thats my quote so ill assume you're addressing me.Phatscotty wrote:Glenn Beck "gave" over 40 million dollars to the gov't last year. that is a pretty big share of provisioning.BigBallinStalin wrote:I support many of the things Mr Beck is against; greater provisioning for the poor, greater rights for the minorities etc etc.
Just curious, how much did you chip in last year? Did you generate over 100 more taxpaying jobs? How many semi's of food did you fill "for the poor"?
I dont understand how Mr Becks tax bill relates to my point that claiming christians are persecuted is absurd. Care to explain? You seem to have cherry picked the wrong part of my post.
He only says that it works even better when it's done privately, and he puts his money where his mouth is.
CalidusFrigidus 2 days agoI don't really get what Glenn's point was
I didnt mean ignore my point though, you get my point right?Lootifer wrote:Ah ok, in that case, just ignore the bit about me and him disagreeing.
That's fine, but you could also take back what you said about him not wanting increased provisions for the poor....Lootifer wrote:Ah ok, in that case, just ignore the bit about me and him disagreeing.
Well I must admit, I listened to about 30 seconds of his roundabout sarcastic dialog on how homosexuals/blacks persecution has nothing on christian persecution and formed my opinion based on that.Phatscotty wrote:That's fine, but you could also take back what you said about him not wanting increased provisions for the poor....Lootifer wrote:Ah ok, in that case, just ignore the bit about me and him disagreeing.
what? He didn't say any of that in the first 30 seconds..... He talked about why you shouldn't hate people for who they are, and reaffirms that skin color, sexuality, and religion, are not reasons to hate people. And that's about the first whole minute, and he did not mention Christianity once, and I would bet he didn't mention it the entire clip.Lootifer wrote:Well I must admit, I listened to about 30 seconds of his roundabout sarcastic dialog on how homosexuals/blacks persecution has nothing on christian persecution and formed my opinion based on that.Phatscotty wrote:That's fine, but you could also take back what you said about him not wanting increased provisions for the poor....Lootifer wrote:Ah ok, in that case, just ignore the bit about me and him disagreeing.
I just assumed you and him shared idealogies since you seem to post a lot of his vids/refer to him a lot.
To me that is implying that religion, specifically mormonism - a sect of christianity, is far more commonly persecuted than race/sexuality.Do you know anyone who hates someone based on their skin colour?
I dont
Do you know anyone who hates someone based on their sexuality?
I dont
Do you know anyone who hates someone based on their religion?
Haha, as a Mormon I know loads...
