Moderator: Community Team
Favorite "Serious" Actors?Gillipig wrote:Oh.....hi there. Don't bother watching this. It's just a little list I put together.
Ranked after date of birth.
Favorite Comedians:
Rowan Atkinson
John Cleese
Peter Sellers
Favorite "Serious" Actors:
Leonardo di Caprio
Russel Crowe
Tom Cruise
Sean Bean
Tom Hanks
Mel Gibson
Kevin Costner
Liam Neeson
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Harrison Ford
Sean Connery
Clark Gable

Do you have a beef with Leo? Okay Arnie has done some comedies but he's not known for them and Crazy is a bit crazy but he's no comedian. Still I can somewhat understand if you object to them being called "serious" actors, but explain to me why Leo shouldn't be considered a serious actor. To me he's the epitome of an actor who takes his job seriously.Sydney0103 wrote:Favorite "Serious" Actors?Gillipig wrote:Oh.....hi there. Don't bother watching this. It's just a little list I put together.
Ranked after date of birth.
Favorite Comedians:
Rowan Atkinson
John Cleese
Peter Sellers
Favorite "Serious" Actors:
Leonardo di Caprio
Russel Crowe
Tom Cruise
Sean Bean
Tom Hanks
Mel Gibson
Kevin Costner
Liam Neeson
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Harrison Ford
Sean Connery
Clark Gable
Leonardo di Caprio
Tom Cruise
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Seriously?
And your point would be?xeno wrote:I accept that you might not like leo but you're wrong and I hate you.


same. I think it's the piece of shit pussy boy in Titanic that enraged me.thegreekdog wrote:I have an unsual backlash-type hatred of Dicaprio.
I never liked Leo, until Inception. (This Boy's Life was an epic movie though) I finally recognized his talent! Christopher Nolan can do that to actors though.Gillipig wrote:Oh.....hi there. Don't bother watching this. It's just a little list I put together.
Ranked after date of birth.
Favorite Comedians:
Rowan Atkinson
John Cleese
Peter Sellers
Favorite "Serious" Actors:
Leonardo di Caprio
Russel Crowe
Tom Cruise
Sean Bean
Tom Hanks
Mel Gibson
Kevin Costner
Liam Neeson
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Harrison Ford
Sean Connery
Clark Gable
I agree Whole Heartedly!!! To your choice of actors, and the last remark also!!Johnny Rockets wrote:
Daniel Day Lewis
Christian Bale
Christopher Walken
However, I'm willing to put Rob Schneider on this list if he brings me the beating heart of Adam Sandler.
Open offer!
JRock

JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Obviously a movie is not good just because of the writing. Good actors + a good script is what makes a good movie.thegreekdog wrote:I have an unsual backlash-type hatred of Dicaprio.
I also think that movies are good because of writing, not because of acting, so I don't have many favorite actors (if any).
I'll go with the following, for obvious reasons:
(1) Scarlett Johanssen
(2) Christina Hendricks
(3) Jennifer Love Hewitt
Robin Williams, I can see because "Death To Smootchy" made me laugh so hard a pissed out a kidney, and "One Hour Photo" was carried on his performance. If you watch one ancient episode of "Mork and Mindy" and then immediately watch "One Hour Photo", the contrast will blow your mind.jay_a2j wrote:Michael Douglas
Kevin Spacy
Jack Nicholson
Danny Devito
Samuel L. Jackson
Robin Williams
Danny Glover
Nicholas Cage
Cuba Gooding Jr
to name a few
The ability to be a good actor is not a hard one to master. There are a host of good actors. Could any young male actor have starred in The Departed or Titantic instead of Dipcario and done just as good a job? Yes.Gillipig wrote:Obviously a movie is not good just because of the writing. Good actors + a good script is what makes a good movie.thegreekdog wrote:I have an unsual backlash-type hatred of Dicaprio.
I also think that movies are good because of writing, not because of acting, so I don't have many favorite actors (if any).
I'll go with the following, for obvious reasons:
(1) Scarlett Johanssen
(2) Christina Hendricks
(3) Jennifer Love Hewitt
I'm amused at how you can be so sure about that.thegreekdog wrote:The ability to be a good actor is not a hard one to master. There are a host of good actors. Could any young male actor have starred in The Departed or Titantic instead of Dipcario and done just as good a job? Yes.Gillipig wrote:Obviously a movie is not good just because of the writing. Good actors + a good script is what makes a good movie.thegreekdog wrote:I have an unsual backlash-type hatred of Dicaprio.
I also think that movies are good because of writing, not because of acting, so I don't have many favorite actors (if any).
I'll go with the following, for obvious reasons:
(1) Scarlett Johanssen
(2) Christina Hendricks
(3) Jennifer Love Hewitt
Let me put it another way - have you ever watching a film based on a book where the film was better than the book?Gillipig wrote:I'm amused at how you can be so sure about that.thegreekdog wrote:The ability to be a good actor is not a hard one to master. There are a host of good actors. Could any young male actor have starred in The Departed or Titantic instead of Dipcario and done just as good a job? Yes.Gillipig wrote:Obviously a movie is not good just because of the writing. Good actors + a good script is what makes a good movie.thegreekdog wrote:I have an unsual backlash-type hatred of Dicaprio.
I also think that movies are good because of writing, not because of acting, so I don't have many favorite actors (if any).
I'll go with the following, for obvious reasons:
(1) Scarlett Johanssen
(2) Christina Hendricks
(3) Jennifer Love Hewitt
He's a brilliant actor and perfect fit for that role. Would the movie be crap without him? No, but few could do it better.
There are overrated actors however. Sam Worthington is very overrated. He made one decent performance in a huge blockbuster (Avatar) but has sucked in every other movie he's been in. He was awful in that terminator movie, same with Clash of the Titans. Sure the script in those movies were not the best but even if they were he'd not do well.
Leo has been in movies with good scripts but he's also always nailed the acting.
Johnny Rockets wrote:
However: I cannot think of anything noteworthy that Cuba G J.R. ever did....anyone care to refresh my memory?
JR
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
*Sigh*, you're like scotty. You shoot your questions into all directions, refusing to stay on topic.thegreekdog wrote:Let me put it another way - have you ever watching a film based on a book where the film was better than the book?Gillipig wrote:I'm amused at how you can be so sure about that.thegreekdog wrote:The ability to be a good actor is not a hard one to master. There are a host of good actors. Could any young male actor have starred in The Departed or Titantic instead of Dipcario and done just as good a job? Yes.Gillipig wrote:Obviously a movie is not good just because of the writing. Good actors + a good script is what makes a good movie.thegreekdog wrote:I have an unsual backlash-type hatred of Dicaprio.
I also think that movies are good because of writing, not because of acting, so I don't have many favorite actors (if any).
I'll go with the following, for obvious reasons:
(1) Scarlett Johanssen
(2) Christina Hendricks
(3) Jennifer Love Hewitt
He's a brilliant actor and perfect fit for that role. Would the movie be crap without him? No, but few could do it better.
There are overrated actors however. Sam Worthington is very overrated. He made one decent performance in a huge blockbuster (Avatar) but has sucked in every other movie he's been in. He was awful in that terminator movie, same with Clash of the Titans. Sure the script in those movies were not the best but even if they were he'd not do well.
Leo has been in movies with good scripts but he's also always nailed the acting.
The Postman - Crappy movie but Kevin Costner does a good performance.thegreekdog wrote:I've given you my three favorite actors. What more do you want? I will not acknowledge that acting in and of itself is something to cherish and celebrate. As far as I'm concerned, filmmakers put whomever is most attractive in a movie and if that movie does well, that attractive person stars in additional movies. When that attractive person becomes less attractive, he or she stars in additional movies pending their relative popularity (see, e.g. Robert Deniro or Al Pacino).
I would rather have a great script and some random people off the street as actors than a shitty script and great actors.
My "shooting questions in all directions" is not meant to obfuscate my position; rather, it's meant to convince you that acting is not something to be celebrated. Acting is merely a means to tell a story in a different medium than the written word.
I can think of a lot of other ways to say the same thing, but I'm concerned you will accuse me of jumping around too much and not address anything I've typed.
But let's take your Sam Worthington example. What movies was Sam Worthington in? Avatar. It was a blockbuster celebrated for what exactly? Acting? No. Visual effects? Yes. Writing? Yes.
What movies was Sam Worthington in after Avatar? Was it Catch Me if You Can or Gangs of New York or The Departed? Because those were DiCaprio's movies after Titanic (with some shitty exceptions). And those were great marxing movies. And not because of DiCaprio... because of the story and the writing.
Let's try another tactic (at the risk of you accusing me of channging the subject) - name five movies that are poorly written but well acted.