Moderator: Community Team

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Yes, I think that's what he meant. (Well, upon re-reading it, it looks like it)strike wolf wrote:I assume you're referring to the man who felt his voice carried less weight, Safari? I was curious about that too wasn't sure what it meant.
that does make sense. can anyone confirm this? does anyone have any interesting actions?jonty125 wrote:Yes, I think that's what he meant. (Well, upon re-reading it, it looks like it)strike wolf wrote:I assume you're referring to the man who felt his voice carried less weight, Safari? I was curious about that too wasn't sure what it meant.

This is all I can gather at a quick glance.edocsil wrote:Knifes flashed (obviously there's a NK action), swords were drawn (yeah...), ropes were tied around struggling opponents (roleblocker?), flames burst (arsonist? I might be looking into this too literally) and lightning even struck the same place thrice (looks like someone was popular last night).
However, nothing happened, at least not that could be seen (so maybe things happened that we don't see, maybe a cult?). 25 beings assembled in the morning, more then slightly confused at their current number. Some felt a little confused (cult?), others felt their words carried less weight (I agree, someone got their vot stolen), but at least they all were present.
I would imagine this is the case, hopefully it is just a one shot, otherwise our power roles will be useless until we devise a plan to get around it./ wrote:"Lightning" may indicate the very uncommon "Lightning Rod" role, or some variation of it, if so, the actions might have been screwed up last night (or at least three of them)
Can I ask which vote? (the one in the thread, or the one by PM)Iliad wrote:Well, my vote was stolen, so that's what the night scene is referring to.
Good thing, I have two of them I suppose. Good work docs I suppose, it's a bit of an odd position that we're in day 2 and still no deaths though.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
But not in the case where we may out a doc, cop, etc to the mafia. If we always just look for claims without testing them we might as well not loook for them at all, this way they can at least have more information before being publicly exposed.ShaggyDan wrote:I have nothing to report from the night.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
Vote Jak for suggesting a no-lynch so early.
That would rely on no one dying at al ever until we decide to lynch scum. Not going to happen.jak111 wrote:But not in the case where we may out a doc, cop, etc to the mafia. If we always just look for claims without testing them we might as well not loook for them at all, this way they can at least have more information before being publicly exposed.ShaggyDan wrote:I have nothing to report from the night.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
Vote Jak for suggesting a no-lynch so early.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
There is always a chance that we out a doc or cop. vote Jak for disregarding the mafia ground rules.jak111 wrote:But not in the case where we may out a doc, cop, etc to the mafia. If we always just look for claims without testing them we might as well not loook for them at all, this way they can at least have more information before being publicly exposed.ShaggyDan wrote:I have nothing to report from the night.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
Vote Jak for suggesting a no-lynch so early.
Let me ask a question about this. Did anything happen to anyone last night? I know that nothing happened TO me and no one died, but did someone receive something or did someone get some sort of message about a change in their character? This sort of this concerns me. This smacks of cult recruiting.edocsil wrote: However, nothing happened, at least not that could be seen.
You made three posts advocating your case and it rightfully earned you the votes you have now... Are you now claiming that you never supported a no lynch? I hardly believe you can call out people on attacking your stupid, stupid suggestion.jak111 wrote:Sha bam.. did you all really think I lost my mind that quickly? Look at this nice band wagon we got hereHow many little piggies can we count on it? Out of the 6 or so voting I'd say 3. Easy bandwagons look attractive to mafia and like bugs to bug zappers they all fry down.