Moderator: Community Team
I was under the impression that roleblocking wouldn't affect the ability of the doublevoter because the doublevote ability is intrinsic like a mason or a lover and not a night action.aage wrote:So there's 2 vote stealers? o.0
Are you sure your extra vote was stolen, Iliad? You could've been roleblocked, would make more sense.

I also have never heard of a roleblocker being able to stop a double voter.safariguy5 wrote:I was under the impression that roleblocking wouldn't affect the ability of the doublevoter because the doublevote ability is intrinsic like a mason or a lover and not a night action.aage wrote:So there's 2 vote stealers? o.0
Are you sure your extra vote was stolen, Iliad? You could've been roleblocked, would make more sense.
Vote stealer maybe, but I don't think doublevoter would lose a vote due to roleblock.

Since it's an ??? vote, I expect it to be an active ability (i.e. the doublevoter sends a pm to the mod to use it, which lovers don't do). Since I never played double voter I haven't a clue whether they usually can be blocked or not, I assumed they could be. If I'm wrong there, as you say, there should be two vote stealers or some kind of copycat role.safariguy5 wrote:I was under the impression that roleblocking wouldn't affect the ability of the doublevoter because the doublevote ability is intrinsic like a mason or a lover and not a night action.aage wrote:So there's 2 vote stealers? o.0
Are you sure your extra vote was stolen, Iliad? You could've been roleblocked, would make more sense.
Vote stealer maybe, but I don't think doublevoter would lose a vote due to roleblock.
I agree with this.gregwolf121 wrote:first off sorry for inactivity internet is nonexistant in my apartment, but terminology wise i believe saint means holy, thus good, and ill need time to catch up so i won't vote, and yeah

Victor Sullivan wrote:Oh snappers! I must apologize, I forgot about this; I was busy over the end of last week and the weekend. Not that it particularly matters, since my vote was stolen anyway
I'll try to catch up. Seems to me I was taking heat yesterday, so I'll try to be quick-like! Thursdays I'm booked, but I'll see if I can't post something meaningful by Friday.
-Sully
Well actually I think jak claimed he stole it.samgrossy wrote:He only claimed his vote was stolen. Guess that implies a vote stealer role? What the heck are the mechanics of that role?
and isnt vote stealer a generally scummy role? hence furthering the case against jak?jonty125 wrote:Well actually I think jak claimed he stole it.samgrossy wrote:He only claimed his vote was stolen. Guess that implies a vote stealer role? What the heck are the mechanics of that role?

No. I'd say it's usually town. Easier to balance that way, as it's not a particularly strong role for town.vodean wrote:and isnt vote stealer a generally scummy role? hence furthering the case against jak?jonty125 wrote:Well actually I think jak claimed he stole it.samgrossy wrote:He only claimed his vote was stolen. Guess that implies a vote stealer role? What the heck are the mechanics of that role?
In the hands of mafia, it's almost as powerful as doublevoter. In general, while it's possible for mafia to have vote manipulation roles, it does make it harder to balance as mafia can endgame prematurely especially if there are no hints as to the size of the mafia.vodean wrote:and isnt vote stealer a generally scummy role? hence furthering the case against jak?jonty125 wrote:Well actually I think jak claimed he stole it.samgrossy wrote:He only claimed his vote was stolen. Guess that implies a vote stealer role? What the heck are the mechanics of that role?

Actually it's stronger than a doublevoter since a) you gain a vote and b) town loses a vote. I'd say it's a town role. Doublevoter, votestealer and voteblocker in the same team seems off though, so i'd say at least one of them is non-town aligned.safariguy5 wrote:In the hands of mafia, it's almost as powerful as doublevoter. In general, while it's possible for mafia to have vote manipulation roles, it does make it harder to balance as mafia can endgame prematurely especially if there are no hints as to the size of the mafia.vodean wrote:and isnt vote stealer a generally scummy role? hence furthering the case against jak?jonty125 wrote:Well actually I think jak claimed he stole it.samgrossy wrote:He only claimed his vote was stolen. Guess that implies a vote stealer role? What the heck are the mechanics of that role?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
This would be correct, William of York sounded like some Angel so I said Angel, plus it doesn't mention anything besides killing the demons. Though if I am human and I am town, it makes me question what the angels are. My original thought was I was an angel, humans were third party and demons were mafia, but as this progresses and I am human apparently I question whether the angels are town or if they are the ones who are third party.VioIet wrote:My guess is that Mr. Squirrel is also a human who has investigative powers. I believe that Jak is human also. The reason he probably said angel, is because his role pm may say something like, "you win when all demon's have been eliminated." That is pure speculation- but to me, it seems that's the only reason why he would say angel.
Perhaps I can shed some light on to how there may be cult in the game. This game is based around some form of christianity one form or another, so a "non believer" or another religion could be recruiting people to their side. Take me in real life for example, I don't believe in any religion and if people listen I'll tell them up front what I think about it, hence someone preaching to unfollow chrisitanity making a cult likely in this game not a far fetched idea as Safari may have you believe, in fact, it almost fits into it perfectly. What does the cult follow or not follow? I don't know, but a cult is definitely a possibility.safariguy5 wrote:I will say that I think the idea of a cult is rather farfetched. Humans recruiting Angels/Demons/Both?
I did mention itjonty125 wrote:Hmm, I'm sure jak said this earlier but it must have got lost in this saint debate. I do agree the two vote stealers are probably not the same alignment.strike wolf wrote:Ebwop: I'd suggest testing this. Starting with Victor's vote.
Funny how it was skipped and people act like it's a new ideajak111 wrote:Though I think I have some information from last night as to who is what... Victor, make a vote, Iiliad, use both your votes, you'll both retract them once they are tested but for now I want to see who is missing their vote. Iiliad said he is, but Victor is the one who should be missing his, so I want to see if there's someone lying or if there's another person who can affect votes.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
We're not. There's you, who claims to block votes, so that would be a vote blocker. Iliad stated that his vote was "stolen", so I assume that someone did steal his vote. Whether his vote was not stolen but blocked would just be a poor phrasing on Iliad's part, but still renders the point I made valid. Two voteblockers in one team plus a doublevoter is too much.jak111 wrote:Why are we assuming there's two vote stealers atm? We haven't even tested to see if Illiad/VS is missing a/their vote. Do you got insider information we should know about about what's happening to Illiad's claim of missing a vote?

~Never claimed to block votes~ re-read.aage wrote:We're not. There's you, who claims to block votes, so that would be a vote blocker. Iliad stated that his vote was "stolen", so I assume that someone did steal his vote. Whether his vote was not stolen but blocked would just be a poor phrasing on Iliad's part, but still renders the point I made valid. Two voteblockers in one team plus a doublevoter is too much.jak111 wrote:Why are we assuming there's two vote stealers atm? We haven't even tested to see if Illiad/VS is missing a/their vote. Do you got insider information we should know about about what's happening to Illiad's claim of missing a vote?
Still, can't rule out any possibilities until we see a dead 3rd party and a dead mafia to better grasp who's who.safariguy5 wrote: As for the idea of angels being mafia, I would think they would be classified as fallen angels.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I just want to say that this is not confirmed. I thought that immediately and now it's an actual issue. All that was confirmed was that there was a secret vote put on Victor. It wasn't confirmed that it was Iliad. It also wasn't confirmed that he even has double votes. At the time of the ??? vote, Iliad was not voting anyone else, so there was no way to know if he's telling the truth or not.strike wolf wrote:I admit it slipped my mind that victors had not been confirmed yet. as for illiad, he proved his role yesterday so innocent until proven guilty on that end.
EBWOP: FASTPOSTED by the man! I don't need replaced!!chapcrap wrote:Ok, I just caught up on 10 pages. Sorry for the inactivity.I just want to say that this is not confirmed. I thought that immediately and now it's an actual issue. All that was confirmed was that there was a secret vote put on Victor. It wasn't confirmed that it was Iliad. It also wasn't confirmed that he even has double votes. At the time of the ??? vote, Iliad was not voting anyone else, so there was no way to know if he's telling the truth or not.strike wolf wrote:I admit it slipped my mind that victors had not been confirmed yet. as for illiad, he proved his role yesterday so innocent until proven guilty on that end.
Next, if you do believe Iliad, people said that he probably was town because it would make mafia too strong. Well, now that there is a at least one vote stealer/blocker, I think we can not assume that Iliad is town at all. He can be any faction.
As far as mechanics of the game, I don't really care at this point. It's all just speculation and conjecture for no reason. We have nothing to go on. It's not going to help us catch scum today. So, I won't be participating in that discussion.
The one other thing that I wanted to comment on was when Mr. S outed his investigation of Vio, someone immediately asked him to full role claim. I thought that was pretty scummy. I'll go back and look who.... It was jonty.
Also, jak, you're in luck, Jesus accepts anyone!