Moderator: Community Team
I totally agree. When a game is started and includes less experienced players it seems a little silly, unrealistic and unsportsmanlike to assume that everyone is going to be playing like a seasoned player might.StinknLincoln wrote:It seems during the game there is always one who badgers another for being 'stupid' or 'giving the game to ...'
Slander of this sort should be admonished to help encourage the new players who seem to get intimidated by rank obsessed players.
And your questions is?StinknLincoln wrote:It seems during the game there is always one who badgers another for being 'stupid' or 'giving the game to ...'
Slander of this sort should be admonished to help encourage the new players who seem to get intimidated by rank obsessed players.
Why don't you do us all a favor and knock yourself out.SirSebstar wrote:And your questions is?StinknLincoln wrote:It seems during the game there is always one who badgers another for being 'stupid' or 'giving the game to ...'
Slander of this sort should be admonished to help encourage the new players who seem to get intimidated by rank obsessed players.
If you want this moved to suggestions, i would ask you to consider the format of your post.
Also, provocative posts belong more in the GD then in here.
in general, gamechat monitoring is deliberatly low key. Hunting down all gamechat for what someone might find offencive is a wee bit way out of the realm of possibility.
If people come to a CC mod because they feel they are being harrassed/boggotry ect, then CC will act, other then that, go knock yourself out..
I would also add that it's not even desirable. Every once in a while people need to throw a tantrum when they are losing. To let off some steam you knowSirSebstar wrote:And your questions is?StinknLincoln wrote:It seems during the game there is always one who badgers another for being 'stupid' or 'giving the game to ...'
Slander of this sort should be admonished to help encourage the new players who seem to get intimidated by rank obsessed players.
If you want this moved to suggestions, i would ask you to consider the format of your post.
Also, provocative posts belong more in the GD then in here.
in general, gamechat monitoring is deliberatly low key. Hunting down all gamechat for what someone might find offencive is a wee bit way out of the realm of possibility.
If people come to a CC mod because they feel they are being harrassed/boggotry ect, then CC will act, other then that, go knock yourself out..
I agree, this post you made is pretty stupid. But I wouldn't go as far as to call you a dumbass. I'll just call you a "special" person.agentcom wrote:... And every once in a while a lot of the time people need to be called out when they're being dumbasses.
I wasn't calling the OP a dumbass. I was talking about some of the people that he apparently thinks should be protected. Sometimes someone makes an awful move. I don't see any reason to protect them from the people that they screw over.Gillipig wrote:I agree, this post you made is pretty stupid. But I wouldn't go as far as to call you a dumbass. I'll just call you a "special" person.agentcom wrote:... And every once in a while a lot of the time people need to be called out when they're being dumbasses.

Yeah, but is anyone really getting screwed? If cooks are involved that should just be taken into consideration and equated into strategy. The consequence for their actions is they lose the game, hence their rank.agentcom wrote:I wasn't calling the OP a dumbass. I was talking about some of the people that he apparently thinks should be protected. Sometimes someone makes an awful move. I don't see any reason to protect them from the people that they screw over.Gillipig wrote:I agree, this post you made is pretty stupid. But I wouldn't go as far as to call you a dumbass. I'll just call you a "special" person.agentcom wrote:... And every once in a while a lot of the time people need to be called out when they're being dumbasses.
I interpreted your post as calling me a dumbass for suggesting that people need to let off steam in game chat lol.agentcom wrote:I wasn't calling the OP a dumbass. I was talking about some of the people that he apparently thinks should be protected. Sometimes someone makes an awful move. I don't see any reason to protect them from the people that they screw over.Gillipig wrote:I agree, this post you made is pretty stupid. But I wouldn't go as far as to call you a dumbass. I'll just call you a "special" person.agentcom wrote:... And every once in a while a lot of the time people need to be called out when they're being dumbasses.
Haha, ok. Sorry about that. Not what I intended at all. I was saying something more like this:Gillipig wrote:I interpreted your post as calling me a dumbass for suggesting that people need to let off steam in game chat lol.agentcom wrote:I wasn't calling the OP a dumbass. I was talking about some of the people that he apparently thinks should be protected. Sometimes someone makes an awful move. I don't see any reason to protect them from the people that they screw over.Gillipig wrote:I agree, this post you made is pretty stupid. But I wouldn't go as far as to call you a dumbass. I'll just call you a "special" person.agentcom wrote:... And every once in a while a lot of the time people need to be called out when they're being dumbasses.
72o wrote:I disagree with OP. People should be ridiculed publicly and foed immediately when they make stupid moves. They need to learn there are consequences for their actions.
72o wrote:I disagree with OP. People should be ridiculed publicly and foed immediately when they make stupid moves. They need to learn there are consequences for their actions.
Gillipig wrote:I agree, this post you made is pretty stupid. But I wouldn't go as far as to call you a dumbass. I'll just call you a "special" person.agentcom wrote:... And every once in a while a lot of the time people need to be called out when they're being dumbasses.