Moderator: Cartographers
not really vaughn03...i wanted to use that on Trafalgar, and was disuaded because everyone has differing interpretations of "Line of Sight"vaughn03 wrote:Can I use 'Line of Sight' as a why to designate attack lines?


I am not sure. Things seem more easily readable at a glance with straight lines of sight. The spirography was a little more difficult, at least for me.nolefan5311 wrote:I don't really like the line of sight. The "spirograph" looks good, but honestly, that might be too vague for people. I think you need some clearly defined attack routes, even if that is only doable with the lines you previously had.

+1 Keep it simple!cairnswk wrote:vaughn03...i think the combination of the two has made it quite confusing.
i do however, like the dots you've got there.
they could work well, imho, by themselves.
I think it would be clearest if there weren't so many. If they didn't have so much overlapping, then I think it would be a pretty intuitive way to explain. But really, the amount and density makes it more difficult I think to decipher, especially with varying colors.tkr4lf wrote:I actually really like the hybrid idea and find it to be the clearest way yet to display all the attack routes.

+1koontz1973 wrote:Second one by far. ...


