Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Aye, in a three player game where one player (green) is consistently on the back foot, it's not a good idea to say:comic boy wrote:Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game
2012-12-14 21:09:22 - General Sharon: green, u are a f*cking idiot
Symmetry wrote:Aye, in a three player game where one player (green) is consistently on the back foot, it's not a good idea to say:comic boy wrote:Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game
2012-12-14 21:09:22 - General Sharon: green, u are a f*cking idiot


Well, I and the mod have asked for more examples. From experience, they won't move on something like this if it's a one off, and a pretty ambiguous one. If there's more evidence, that would add weight.General Sharon wrote:okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes
general sharon
Symmetry wrote:Well, I and the mod have asked for more examples. From experience, they won't move on something like this if it's a one off, and a pretty ambiguous one. If there's more evidence, that would add weight.General Sharon wrote:okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes
general sharon
Up to you.
I pretty much wont even look into benefit of doubts. This guy clearly insults him! Would also put me on a bad footing with the guy who would insult me. I think the game is all cool as long as the guy who insulted me doenst win XD!sniffie wrote:Do you have more examples then only this game. Otherwise I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
If you do not wish to play this person again, foe him. Feel free to rate accordingly.
sniff

