Moderator: Cartographers

Certainly, I'll post how I did it, I'm pretty sure there is an easier way that you or someone else might have.koontz1973 wrote:Seamus, now that is a bridge, but wood will be a lot better. Thanks for that idea.
Like you, I get it and I doubt it will be needed, but as this is the first of its kind, it might be better to have it on the map itself. If I put a line under the conditional border heading saying:Seamus76 wrote:Does it need to be stated that when blue borders close, red borders open? I get it, but not sure if others will be confused.


No, I did a map of modern Cairo using ancient graphics.Oneyed wrote:I like the new graphics. but my feelings is that you tried to do map about old (ancient, medieval) Cairo. just you use modern Cairo (squares, names). am I wrong?
Oneyed



The grey might look weird now, but once all of the image tags are removed and it's in the site it should look good.koontz1973 wrote:Yes to removing the wholes apart form the large one. With the grey, it is too bright but will try that again.
Removed both. Seamus said the same thing. Still not sure about using the plain sites backing but will post it again. And yes, it was GIMPS own wood. I just wanted to try it.ManBungalow wrote:The bold outermost region border is bad.
It doesn't burn well into the parchment.
And remember that you can get some great public domain wood textures instead of the tiled GIMP default wood fill for the background.


Still very early nole. Tried the stone, tried papyrus, if they do not work for you, then what would you like to see? Happy to try anything.nolefan5311 wrote:Maybe I'm late with this, but I don't really like the new look of the map. The playable area doesn't stand out at all from the background.

If this is the one you mean, then I don't approve:koontz1973 wrote:Will have another go at the stone then.
Never asked your permission ManB.ManBungalow wrote:If this is the one you mean, then I don't approve:koontz1973 wrote:Will have another go at the stone then.


