Moderator: Community Team
42.thegreekdog wrote:As I trudged into the elevator on my way to the office today, I contemplated why I was expected to work Monday through Friday?
And then I contemplated why there were Mondays and Fridays in the first place? Who determined that a week should be seven days and why?
And then I thought about who determined that a day is 24 hours and why?
And just when I started thinking about why someone decided on the amount of minutes in an hour, I got to my floor?
Careful, jones may accuse Douglas Adams of being a toilet head.Metsfanmax wrote:42.thegreekdog wrote:As I trudged into the elevator on my way to the office today, I contemplated why I was expected to work Monday through Friday?
And then I contemplated why there were Mondays and Fridays in the first place? Who determined that a week should be seven days and why?
And then I thought about who determined that a day is 24 hours and why?
And just when I started thinking about why someone decided on the amount of minutes in an hour, I got to my floor?
Interesting. A few thoughts:AndyDufresne wrote:I'll speak the the 24 hour day bit. I recall that a number of our precursor ancient civilizations were fond of counting things in base 12, instead of say in base 10. Now everyone in our modern era is left with a bit of a mish-mash of various counting methods jammed together, examples:
Base 6 (60 Seconds in a minute, etc)
Base 10 (So many things)
Base 12 (24 hours a day)
But mathematics and numbers have ever been a strong suit of mine, I just recall this from some history reading I think.
Edit: I turned to my trusty friend, Scientific American, and just located this article from a number of years ago. A fun read to give you some history and insight: Why is a minute divided into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, yet there are only 24 hours in a day?
--Andy
(3) f*ck yeah Greeks!This division reflected Egypt's use of the duodecimal system--the importance of the number 12 is typically attributed either to the fact that it equals the number of lunar cycles in a year or the number of finger joints on each hand (three in each of the four fingers, excluding the thumb), making it possible to count to 12 with the thumb.
(4) See... this makes sense to me -The concept of fixed-length hours, however, did not originate until the Hellenistic period, when Greek astronomers began using such a system for their theoretical calculations. Hipparchus, whose work primarily took place between 147 and 127 B.C., proposed dividing the day into 24 equinoctial hours, based on the 12 hours of daylight and 12 hours of darkness observed on equinox days.
(5) Culture beats science again!Despite this suggestion, laypeople continued to use seasonally varying hours for many centuries. (Hours of fixed length became commonplace only after mechanical clocks first appeared in Europe during the 14th century.)
This changed in 1967, when the second was redefined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 energy transitions of the cesium atom. This recharacterization ushered in the era of atomic timekeeping and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Interestingly, in order to keep atomic time in agreement with astronomical time, leap seconds occasionally must be added to UTC. Thus, not all minutes contain 60 seconds. A few rare minutes, occurring at a rate of about eight per decade, actually contain 61.
Actually, astrophysics beats atomic physics again.thegreekdog wrote: (5) Culture beats science again!
This changed in 1967, when the second was redefined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 energy transitions of the cesium atom. This recharacterization ushered in the era of atomic timekeeping and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Interestingly, in order to keep atomic time in agreement with astronomical time, leap seconds occasionally must be added to UTC. Thus, not all minutes contain 60 seconds. A few rare minutes, occurring at a rate of about eight per decade, actually contain 61.
No he wasn't. he did however go to school with two toilet-heads that I know of.thegreekdog wrote:Careful, jones may accuse Douglas Adams of being a toilet head.Metsfanmax wrote:42.thegreekdog wrote:As I trudged into the elevator on my way to the office today, I contemplated why I was expected to work Monday through Friday?
And then I contemplated why there were Mondays and Fridays in the first place? Who determined that a week should be seven days and why?
And then I thought about who determined that a day is 24 hours and why?
And just when I started thinking about why someone decided on the amount of minutes in an hour, I got to my floor?
Probably because unless something is a dramatic improvement or invention, changing is too much work.thegreekdog wrote: Interesting. A few thoughts:
(1) My question is more to do with why do we still use these things a
I was hoping for a discussion of a revolution with respect to having to work five days in a row. I think that change would be too much work too though.AndyDufresne wrote:Probably because unless something is a dramatic improvement or invention, changing is too much work.thegreekdog wrote: Interesting. A few thoughts:
(1) My question is more to do with why do we still use these things a
--Andy
A remarkably trivial change, from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar, which had almost no real impact on anyone except maybe archivists, almost resulted in mass uprisings. Can you imagine what a real change would result in?thegreekdog wrote:]
(1) My question is more to do with why do we still use these things and not something else and not so much where they came from, but being the ex-history major that I am... er was... it is interesting.
Probably. Changing it would be even more difficult in our modern global economy I think now. We already really only have say 4 straight work days where you can communicate business relations around the world, due to timezones and weekends. Moreover, do you think religious and cultural communities would push back to encroachment on their weekend turf?thegreekdog wrote: I was hoping for a discussion of a revolution with respect to having to work five days in a row. I think that change would be too much work too though.
France has a four-day work week. Unfortunately, in most countries materialistic claptrap is valued more than quality of life, and so we slave away in order to clutter our lives with more pointless shit. C'est la vie.thegreekdog wrote: I was hoping for a discussion of a revolution with respect to having to work five days in a row. I think that change would be too much work too though.
To what? Less than a 5 day work week in total, or just a segmented 5 day work week?thegreekdog wrote:While I acknowledge that a "real change" would be difficult, I do not think it would cause an uprising among the general public; in fact, I would suspect the general public would be in favor of a change in the way we work.
I'm not sure yet. Ideally, I would say a less than five day work week (although I bet not many people just work 5 days). However, given the relative trouble with that whole thing, I would even go for a three day work week and then one day off (an eight day week). Or make it a 10-day work week with 4 days of work and 1 day off. I have to think about that some more though, since I do like my long weekends.AndyDufresne wrote:To what? Less than a 5 day work week in total, or just a segmented 5 day work week?thegreekdog wrote:While I acknowledge that a "real change" would be difficult, I do not think it would cause an uprising among the general public; in fact, I would suspect the general public would be in favor of a change in the way we work.
--Andy
Would that change maximize profit?thegreekdog wrote:I was hoping for a discussion of a revolution with respect to having to work five days in a row. I think that change would be too much work too though.AndyDufresne wrote:Probably because unless something is a dramatic improvement or invention, changing is too much work.thegreekdog wrote: Interesting. A few thoughts:
(1) My question is more to do with why do we still use these things a
--Andy
Thanks, but I wanted to get some consensus from CC denizens first.AndyDufresne wrote:TGD, set up an excel spreadsheet explaining your calendar and I'll pass it along to the UN.
--Andy
Maximize profit for whom?BigBallinStalin wrote:Would that change maximize profit?
Already on the internet we see markets where producers offer their labor or goods (e.g. http://fiverr.com/). Demand from final* consumers immediately cuts through the intermediaries and straight to the producers. Instead of working 5-day weeks, the demand for your labor could be more profitably organized into various schedules.thegreekdog wrote:While I acknowledge that a "real change" would be difficult, I do not think it would cause an uprising among the general public; in fact, I would suspect the general public would be in favor of a change in the way we work.
Perhaps for producers in cyber markets which have a more direct path toward final consumers.thegreekdog wrote:Thanks, but I wanted to get some consensus from CC denizens first.AndyDufresne wrote:TGD, set up an excel spreadsheet explaining your calendar and I'll pass it along to the UN.
--Andy
Maximize profit for whom?BigBallinStalin wrote:Would that change maximize profit?
I technically have whenever hours. I also have minimum requirements with respect to total hours, billable hours, and other such statistics. A guy I work with rolls in between 10:30 AM and 11 AM. He also works until 1 AM. He does pretty well, except when someone schedules a meeting for 8 AM.AndyDufresne wrote:TGD, can we have your cell phone to call you at midnight about concerned posts in the Off Topics?
Moreover, have anyone you ever worked a job where you had "whatever" hours? When I first employed by CC, I essentially had a "whatever" hours job, but as I started to take on more responsibilities, I moved into a set office time because I found I worked more efficiently that way, and I also found I enjoyed knowing when I would be done for the day too. Ha.
--Andy
Hopefully, your wage already compensates you sufficiently for such calls/emails. If so, then is the complaining justified? Or is it a profitable opportunity for releasing stress and finding sympathy?thegreekdog wrote:Here's my skepticism on that score: The rise of computers, interwebs, etc. was supposed to make work it easier (and those advances have) and they were supposed to result in better flexibility. I would argue that computers, internet, email, mobile devices, and the like, have made work more time consuming. In the "good old days" when a person left work, he or she left work. In the modern era, work comes with you. It's not uncommon for me to get calls on my mobile phone at midnight from concerned clients or colleagues regarding a particular issue. In the past, the concerned party would have to wait for me to come into the office. It's not uncommon for teachers to get emails from concerned parents who may have just waited until parent/teacher night.
So, will the changing of a work week maximize profits? Don't know.
These types of rules I usually live by, otherwise I'll spend too much outside of work time thinking about work.BigBallinStalin wrote: Of course, there may be the possibility of shaping your environment to your own demands. In some situations, you could create and enforce implicit rules like "not responding to work-emails after work-hours." In a sense, you can control the environment, or maybe you'll get fired.