Moderator: Community Team
I'm just not seeing the highest/lowest being any value other than flash, there being so many ways to artificially alter these two(battle royales, point dumps, etc.). Median I can see as being potentially useful as it gives a much more accurate impression of the overall skill of a player in respect the their entire cc career but the other two I still think are more or less useless.betiko wrote:you must have a very impressive low score max after your christmas tilt!maxfaraday wrote:I'll support this suggestion if you put the lowest score as well.![]()
yes, I think no one is against low score + medium/median score as well.
Funky, where else would you want it to be? the profile is where you can see all statistics from a player, and if you're facing someone and you want to see quickly this information, there is no place else that could be more convenient. high/median/low is part of the profile of a player.


Sent you a friend request on GameKnot!macbone wrote:I love all the stats Gameknot puts on my page. It lists my rating (score), my percentile (a horrible 20%), games won, games lost, draws, and total games.
In addition, I have games in progress, my mini-tournament points, my team rating (how cool would a clan rating be?), my rating floor, timeouts, average time per move, longest winning streak, and longest losing streak (10 - ouch!)
I have my games won/lost/drawn/moves made broken down for all games, team games, playing as white, and playing as black.
Then, I have my ratings for the past 90 days, year, and all rated games: Average chess rating, highest chess rating, lowest chess rating, average opponent rating, highest rating won against, lowest rating lost against, and average moves per game, along with arrows that show if those stats are increasing or decreasing.
They're certainly incentive for improvement!
And then there's a pie chart for wins, losses, and draws, and a line graph that plots my own rating over the past year and my opponents' average rating.
Granted, my stats are pretty awful, but they're still nice to have. =)
Yes, because he/she could have become brig from some sort of artificial means so it doesn't actually show you anything concrete. Besides, if you're facing a Corporal and his/her median score is above or below Corporal that's going to tell you what you really need to know right?betiko wrote:so basically what you're saying is that if you're facing a caporal; it's irrelevant information for you to know that this guy is a former brig or that caporal is actually his best rank ever?

Everyone who bothered to post in this thread, yeah looks that way.chapcrap wrote:So, everyone likes this except Funky?

I think the real point of this is to brag and remember good times, not demean and remember bad times. So, I think the lowest is probably a bad idea.Funkyterrance wrote:Everyone who bothered to post in this thread, yeah looks that way.chapcrap wrote:So, everyone likes this except Funky?
Although, this has sort of turned into a suggestion for lowest, highest and mean rank, the last of which I think may have some use.
Precisely why I've been more or less anti from the beginning.chapcrap wrote: I think the real point of this is to brag and remember good times...

funky is a non bragger....shun him!Funkyterrance wrote:Precisely why I've been more or less anti from the beginning.chapcrap wrote: I think the real point of this is to brag and remember good times...

well if we did this that would be great I was just trying to appeal to funky a bit. im OK with anything as are, im guessing, most people. I am actually surprised this website doesn't do it. almost every video game/ online game ever shows a high score.Jdsizzleslice wrote:I think we should just stick with the Highest attained Rank/Score

Exactly.jsnyder748 wrote:well if we did this that would be great I was just trying to appeal to funky a bit. im OK with anything as are, im guessing, most people. I am actually surprised this website doesn't do it. almost every video game/ online game ever shows a high score.Jdsizzleslice wrote:I think we should just stick with the Highest attained Rank/Score
I don't know that you're asking too much. I don't think I really want the lowest score, personally, but I don't care that much.dakky21 wrote:There should be in fact "Show detailed statistics" of an user, where everything is listed, for start it is ok to write only highest rank/score, but there should be also lowest rank/score, graph of gaining medals over time, graph of played games over time etc... but I know I'm asking too much
I would be slightly interested to see my lowest score. I was a cook once upon a time, you know!chapcrap wrote:I think the real point of this is to brag and remember good times, not demean and remember bad times. So, I think the lowest is probably a bad idea.Funkyterrance wrote:Everyone who bothered to post in this thread, yeah looks that way.chapcrap wrote:So, everyone likes this except Funky?
Although, this has sort of turned into a suggestion for lowest, highest and mean rank, the last of which I think may have some use.
As for mean, I don't remember reading that, but I believe it's in there. I'm not sure how that would work. Average score at midnight since the day you joined? Average score after each game finished? That's a little more hazy and probably a lot more harder to code than the highest score.
Either way, I'm going to sticky this thread for a bit.
thisagentcom wrote:....I think a player's highest score is as important an achievement as the medals that they've won and have no problem with that being on the profile page. So, I am in support of this suggestion.
I would love a User Stats page that has a lot of the stuff maprank has on it, but I don't see that happening nearly as quickly as just adding high score to the profiles.