Moderator: Community Team
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
A banana equivalent dose (abbreviated BED) is a nonstandard unit of radiation exposure, defined as the additional dose a person will absorb from eating one banana.
The concept is based on the fact that bananas, like most organic material, naturally contain a certain amount of radioactive isotopes—even in the absence of any contamination due to human nuclear endeavors. The banana equivalent dose was meant to express the severity of exposure to radiation, such as resulting from nuclear power, nuclear weapons or medical procedures, in terms that would make sense to most people.
The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.Woodruff wrote:I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>Metsfanmax wrote:The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.Woodruff wrote:I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I think you should be stripped of your Starfleet commission for not knowing that.Woodruff wrote:True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>Metsfanmax wrote:The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.Woodruff wrote:I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
NERD ALERT!!Metsfanmax wrote:The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.Woodruff wrote:I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
Indeed. Spock would be sorely disappointed.Dukasaur wrote:I think you should be stripped of your Starfleet commission for not knowing that.Woodruff wrote:True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>Metsfanmax wrote:The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.Woodruff wrote:I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)
At the very least.
Maybe even imprisoned on Rura Penthe.
I did not know that "barleycorn" was a measurement. Of crops, I presume?MegaProphet wrote:I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system
In my house, the term "nerd" is a compliment, mister!nietzsche wrote:NERD ALERT!!

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
between the sex with farm animals thing, and now this, I pretty much think Colombia is just the Arkansas of South America, except with hotter womenFalkomagno wrote:In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Woodruff wrote:I did not know that "barleycorn" was a measurement. Of crops, I presume?MegaProphet wrote:I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system
Knuth published his first "scientific" article in a school magazine in 1957 under the title "Potrzebie System of Weights and Measures." In it, he defined the fundamental unit of length as the thickness of Mad #26, and named the fundamental unit of force "whatmeworry." Mad published the article in issue #33 (June 1957).
What do those huge sacks of coke weigh in pounds or kilograms?saxitoxin wrote:between the sex with farm animals thing, and now this, I pretty much think Colombia is just the Arkansas of South America, except with hotter womenFalkomagno wrote:In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):
DId you just make that up? A search finds no matches.notyou2 wrote:Anthour