your ideal day with xeno (represented by Timminz, QC)

[Serbia]

12 hours of ignoring him and pretending he doesn't exist, while I drink copious amounts of liquor, and in doing so, find myself increasingly hilarious.

Bollocks.

[BigBallinStalin]

Cook a nice meal for him, spend hours conversing and going out, then never call him again.

[Funkyterrance]

Hmm, my ideal day with john9blue...

Cuddling?

[DoomYoshi]

I would take him to the family cottage. We could catch frogs and fish and canoe and swim and hike and play some old board games.

[Army of GOD]

1. Watch pirated episodes of Legends of the Hidden Temple.
2. Go to TexMex restaurant.
3. Go to Rod Stewart concert.
4. Pillow fight!!

[Lootifer]

Sit around for the day slowly drinking shit beer and bitching about how no one else gets it

[nietzsche]

12 hours of hot american slutty college girls

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Staring contest.

-TG

[Phatscotty]

Matrix Trilogy

[saxitoxin]

JOHN9BLUE'S IDEAL DAY WITH YOU

John9Blue will now vote on which suggestions he prefers by ranking his top choices 1, 2, 3:

- 12 hours of engaging in stupid, trolling, flaming bullshit with AndyDufresne
- 12 hours of a corn boil supper, followed by watching Disney films with notyou2
- 12 hours of touring the FDR presidential library with ooge
- 12 hours of confessing to the Pope with Dukasaur
- 12 hours of being ignored by Serbia while he gets drunk
- 12 hours of being bromanced by BBS and then kicked to the curb
- 12 hours of cuddling with FunkyTerrance
- 12 hours of swimming, hiking and playing board games with DoomYoshi at his cabin
- 12 hours of watching LHT, eating TexMex, then going to a Rod Stewart concert, followed by a pillow fight with AoG
- 12 hours of drunken complaining with Lootifer
- 12 hours of hanging out with drunk, slutty, American college girls with nietzsche
- 12 hours of having a staring contest with TA1LGUNN3R
- 12 hours of watching the Matrix trilogy with PhatScotty

[Gillipig]

Two words, space flight! But since he's Mexican I doubt he has he dough.

Interestingly, I just checked, and that would make you only the second Swede in the history of the human species to have ever entered space (tied with Mongolia). Though four Mexicans have traveled to the final frontier (five with nietzsche).

I think Gillpig's brashness must be how Neanderthals boasted about their glory days at the dawn of homo sapien.

Viva la Raza

Tss irrelevant information as per usual saxi. This is what matters:

Bnp per capita (the number is in thousands of dollars per year)

Sweden 41,191
Mexico 15,312

The average Swede makes almost three times as much money as the average mexican, who was caveman now again?

Sweden's French king has done a good job getting the Swedes to dig up gold, but any people can be forced to work. They can't be forced to become adventurous, curious people willing to step outdoors. That's why only one Swede has been found willing to travel to space, while there have been four Mexicans.

Sweden is an old oak tree slowly wasting away. Mexico is a young sapling growing bigger and stronger.

Again you ramble. The last thing you said made no sense at all. And the Swedish king is not the reason we're wealthy, the Swedish people is the reason we're doing good. What does that say about the mexican people?

"We're doing good" is what the Neanderthals said until Homo Sapien was strong enough to take away the Neanderthals wealth - then drive them over a cliff. Sweden reached a certain point and stopped evolving (only one Swede in space, the same number as Mongolia). Mexico hasn't reached that point but is still evolving.

Soon, like Neanderthal, your things will be taken away and you will be drove off a cliff. But the best qualities of Swedes will be preserved and assimilated into La Raza through the DNA of your females.

Gillpig - your great grandson 150 years from now will be named José (not Sven) and he will eat tamales (not meatballs).

Yeah because Mexico is competing with Sweden in so many ways!! Not to speak of how many mexicans there are in Sweden, *cough*. Get down on earth grandpa, you're not in heaven yet!
Maybe you're projecting, I can totally see the U.S population being overrun by filthy border jumpers one day.

[Haggis_McMutton]

Based on these two posts:

Spoiler

Subject: Post Any Evidence For God Here

this topic is pathetic.

if this were a judged debate, chiro and viceroy would be crushing you idiots.

just because you are in the majority (and, IMO, correct) opinion doesn't mean you get to circlejerk and post stupid trolling flaming bullshit

Subject: Post Any Evidence For God Here

if the opposition posts sarcastic one-liners and youtube videos, then i agree, there's hardly a debate at all.

quit being an apologist for "your" side just because you agree with them.

and people wonder why nobody likes atheists...

12 hours of engaging in stupid trolling flaming bullshit (which includes, but is not limited to: posting sarcastic one-liners and youtube videos; circle jerking; and other pathetic endeavors).


--Andy

12 hours of explaining to john the value of mocking crazy people who have proved to be immune to rational discourse, and the danger inherent in lending credibility to these crazies by explaining the facts to them for the 57000th time.

[betiko]

11.999999 hours of me slapping him in the face with my cock

we have a word for this in french, no kidding. It's called a "biffle". comes from "bite"=dick and "giffle"= slap in the face.

Therefore, can I invent a new english verb, "to dilap"? (or being a none english speaker I can't be granted this priviledge?)

"Will liked to bully, he dilapped all his friends for no reason."

[Funkyterrance]

12 hours of explaining to john the value of mocking crazy people who have proved to be immune to rational discourse, and the danger inherent in lending credibility to these crazies by explaining the facts to them for the 57000th time.

For serious?
Just hypothetically speaking, who is more pitiful? The "crazy" person or the person trying to explain to/laughing at the crazy person? And that's even assuming the "non-crazy" person has for certain a better understanding of the universe.

Let me ask all you haters something. Who is your favorite Stooge? If it's not Moe, you are all a bunch of hypocrites.

[Haggis_McMutton]

For serious?
Just hypothetically speaking, who is more pitiful? The "crazy" person or the person trying to explain to/laughing at the crazy person? And that's even assuming the "non-crazy" person has for certain a better understanding of the universe.

Let me ask all you haters something. Who is your favorite Stooge? If it's not Moe, you are all a bunch of hypocrites.

Let's not forget that the crazy person is trying to convince us that we're all stupid/going to hell/hate white people/etc. I'm not just going in his house and yelling at him.

If the crazy person keeps to himself, that's fine. But when he starts raving about "dem muslims" and "the huge conspiracy to send our kids to hell by teaching them we come from dirty apes" then the correct course of action is to A. try debating them and B. if they show they are unwilling or unable to engage in meaningful debate, then mock them.

And I have no idea, never watched that.

[BigBallinStalin]

11.999999 hours of me slapping him in the face with my cock

we have a word for this in french, no kidding. It's called a "biffle". comes from "bite"=dick and "giffle"= slap in the face.

Therefore, can I invent a new english verb, "to dilap"? (or being a none english speaker I can't be granted this priviledge?)

"Will liked to bully, he dilapped all his friends for no reason."

Click image to enlarge.

[nietzsche]

BBS, what's the resolution of your screen?

[AndyDufresne]

BBS, what's the resolution of your screen?

BBS owns and operates an IMAX theatre actually.


--Andy

[Funkyterrance]

If the crazy person keeps to himself, that's fine. But when he starts raving about "dem muslims" and "the huge conspiracy to send our kids to hell by teaching them we come from dirty apes" then the correct course of action is to A. try debating them and B. if they show they are unwilling or unable to engage in meaningful debate, then mock them.

And I have no idea, never watched that.

Moe is the guy on the left:

[BigBallinStalin]

BBS, what's the resolution of your screen?

BBS owns and operates an IMAX theatre actually.


--Andy

That's how I own and operate, ya'erd?

[Army of GOD]

BBS that image is too small. lrn2notdownloadthumbnail

[notyou2]

NEXT!!!

[Army of GOD]

11.999999 hours of me slapping him in the face with my cock

we have a word for this in french, no kidding. It's called a "biffle". comes from "bite"=dick and "giffle"= slap in the face.

Therefore, can I invent a new english verb, "to dilap"? (or being a none english speaker I can't be granted this priviledge?)

"Will liked to bully, he dilapped all his friends for no reason."

Does it have a verb too (je te biffle)?

Also, is it one f or two?

[Serbia]

NEXT!!!

HOLD YOUR HORSES OLD GUY BLUEJOHN HAS TO PICK FIRST DAMN YOU OLD FOLKS ARE IMPATIENT

[ooge]

For serious?
Just hypothetically speaking, who is more pitiful? The "crazy" person or the person trying to explain to/laughing at the crazy person? And that's even assuming the "non-crazy" person has for certain a better understanding of the universe.

Let me ask all you haters something. Who is your favorite Stooge? If it's not Moe, you are all a bunch of hypocrites.

Let's not forget that the crazy person is trying to convince us that we're all stupid/going to hell/hate white people/etc. I'm not just going in his house and yelling at him.

If the crazy person keeps to himself, that's fine. But when he starts raving about "dem muslims" and "the huge conspiracy to send our kids to hell by teaching them we come from dirty apes" then the correct course of action is to A. try debating them and B. if they show they are unwilling or unable to engage in meaningful debate, then mock them.

And I have no idea, never watched that.