7 UP II [TPA3] [COMPLETE]

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Wed May 22, 2013 7:15 am

Round 3 Scores and Totals so far are now published here.

Chariot of Fire · Post by **Chariot of Fire** » Wed May 22, 2013 10:31 am

Great update Dave, cheers.

Nice to see those Monkis getting spanked in R3 and 7OFU regaining its rightful place (ahem).

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Wed May 22, 2013 4:18 pm

Hm, are you sure DaveH that my team gained only so few points on round 3?!

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Fri May 24, 2013 1:34 am

skillfull wrote:Hm, are you sure DaveH that my team gained only so few points on round 3?!

26 points is pretty good! Perhaps you would like to donate a few to my team?

You can check the winning games and points on my main thread - and the games in case I have not put in the correct result.

friendly1 · Post by **friendly1** » Wed May 29, 2013 8:01 am

DaveH wrote:
skillfull wrote:Hm, are you sure DaveH that my team gained only so few points on round 3?!
26 points is pretty good! Perhaps you would like to donate a few to my team?

You can check the winning games and points on my main thread - and the games in case I have not put in the correct result.

Game 12716272 - game does not exist. Was this a game which was forfeit due to player not joining? If so, why does it show a win for frenchie in round 10? Skillfull had posted earlier and the reply was that games were forfeited so my guess is this is a mistake?

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Wed May 29, 2013 10:23 am

friendly1 wrote:Game 12716272 - game does not exist. Was this a game which was forfeit due to player not joining? If so, why does it show a win for frenchie in round 10? Skillfull had posted earlier and the reply was that games were forfeited so my guess is this is a mistake?

Damn - yes a mistake! Well spotted! TSM have 7 points more; Frenchie 7 fewer - I have amended the points tables accordingly.

kratos644 · Post by **kratos644** » Fri May 31, 2013 11:18 pm

For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:32 am

kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...

It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.

kratos644 · Post by **kratos644** » Sat Jun 01, 2013 1:36 am

DaveH wrote:
kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.

But see our play was so excellent that the other team didn't want to fill the game. I'd say that's quite the demonstration.

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:42 am

kratos644 wrote:
DaveH wrote:
kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.
But see our play was so excellent that the other team didn't want to fill the game. I'd say that's quite the demonstration.

- Yes, I'm sure! We still have 12 rounds to go, so I am sure your excellence will put you so far ahead that these few points won't matter!

slytown · Post by **slytown** » Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:58 am

kratos644 wrote:
DaveH wrote:
kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.
But see our play was so excellent that the other team didn't want to fill the game. I'd say that's quite the demonstration.

haha

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 9:46 am

Chariot of Fire wrote:Great update Dave, cheers.

Nice to see those Monkis getting spanked in R3 and 7OFU regaining its rightful place (ahem).

Thanks Simon for waking me up and made me see there was a mistake!

Chariot of Fire · Post by **Chariot of Fire** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:51 am

dangnabbit!

ttblanch · Post by **ttblanch** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:17 am

Can we at least choose our new teammate ? You filled a game with 2 stangers. We will give you names soon.

TY

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:44 pm

ttblanch wrote:Can we at least choose our new teammate ? You filled a game with 2 stangers. We will give you names soon.

TY

No problem - but It was on May 27th that I brought his absence to your attention and the only response was from darkseb's sitter who asked for him to be replaced!

slytown · Post by **slytown** » Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:29 pm

think we might get an update on scores dave? I know its a lot to ask and especially of someone who rescued the tournament already ... just curious is all and I assume the last 2 round 4 games and a few round 5 games have finished by now.

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Sun Jun 16, 2013 2:18 am

slytown wrote:think we might get an update on scores dave? I know its a lot to ask and especially of someone who rescued the tournament already ... just curious is all and I assume the last 2 round 4 games and a few round 5 games have finished by now.

Round 4 scores

totals so far

aad0906 · Post by **aad0906** » Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:49 pm

Game 12905421 invites got messed up, I have the wrong partners.

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Tue Jun 25, 2013 4:20 am

aad0906 wrote:Game 12905421 invites got messed up, I have the wrong partners.

That's a strange one - code is OK though. I'll set up a new game and invite directly.

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Thu Jun 27, 2013 4:01 pm

Again!
Both games haven't started....we are waiting one player.
Game 12905429
Game 12905460

DaveH · Post by **DaveH** » Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:48 am

skillfull wrote:Again!
Both games haven't started....we are waiting one player.
Game 12905429
Game 12905460

Invites sent again!

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:58 am

Osujacket is away till Sunday, what should we do? W8 till his gets back or join in for him?

Arama86n · Post by **Arama86n** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:10 am

Armandolas has replaced Fulch in our team as previously stated, but Fulch has received this rounds invites. Can you please resend invites or PW for games to Armandolas?

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:03 am

skillfull wrote:Osujacket is away till Sunday, what should we do? W8 till his gets back or join in for him?

Tell me what to do because i am his sitter.

Arama86n · Post by **Arama86n** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:20 am

skillfull wrote:
skillfull wrote:Osujacket is away till Sunday, what should we do? W8 till his gets back or join in for him?
Tell me what to do because i am his sitter.

Now, I'm no authority, but If I'd suggest you go to his inbox, look at the two PM's from DaveH, and join his two games.
I can't see why you shouldn't do this as a sitter. This is a tournament, and as such you are allowed to join games from the person you sit for. The fact that the TO has sent the links in a PM instead of directly inviting the person should be of no consequence.

7 UP II [TPA3] [COMPLETE]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]