Moderator: Community Team
Did you respond with "everyone's"? Because we do have a right to privacy.Phatscotty wrote:But as for the 2 people I respect most, one of them who taught me some extremely valuable skills for life and even taught me a lot about how to be a man is at odds with me, he keeps saying "name one person who's rights were violated"
That's the key for me. Issuing of warrants for specific individuals.Phatscotty wrote:In a perfect world, this could work, so long as we could trust the government to use government programs the right way and to do the right thing, and to me that includes getting a warrant amongst other things
I would rephrase it to say "we can keep the people as safe while respecting". Because we can't necessarily guarantee safety, but I don't think that we're particularly increasing our level of safety by doing these things, as the very amateur Boston Bombing showed quite clearly.Phatscotty wrote:I still hold that we can keep the people safe and respect the rights of the American people.

He might get off easy. After all, the last NSA whistleblower (who did first attempt to report the regime's "Trailblazer" citizen loyalty monitoring program to Congress and the Inspector-General) only had to settle for being stripped of all pension and retirement benefits (at the age of 58) by Obama and getting stuck working at an Apple store until he's 90.notyou2 wrote:Make sure I understand this.
The US government tramples, no wait, tramples is too light a word, buries for all eternity the privacy rights of all it's citizens (not to mention the privacy rights of the rest of the worlds inhabitants) and some guy with a conscience that knows right from wrong spills the beans, and he has now become the traitor?
Attorney General Eric Holder is known to love his Apple gadgets. But this past weekend, a trip to an Apple store to peruse the selection of iPhones ended abruptly after the attorney general found himself face to face with a man the Justice Department is prosecuting as an enemy of the state.
Mr. Drake was working his shift at the Apple store in Bethesda, Md., when he saw Mr. Holder, along with his Federal Bureau of Investigation security detail, in the store and approached him. Mr. Drake sent the following account of the encounter via email to Jesselyn Radack, an official with the whistleblowing group Government Accountability Project, which is assisting his defense.
“I’m Thomas Drake, the former National Security Agency official who’s been in the news,” Mr. Drake told Mr. Holder
“Do you know why they have come after me?” he asked the attorney general.
Mr. Holder replied: “Yes, I do.”
To which, Mr. Drake responded: “But do you know the rest of the story?”
Without a word, Mr. Holder turned and walked out of the store.
A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment, except to say that Mr. Holder is a “fan of Apple products.”
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/06/0 ... encounter/
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Left wing? a party of one,Bernie Sanders.jonesthecurl wrote:Night Strike wrote:And those same Democrats who are defending it now were complaining that Bush was going to find out what books you checked out at the library. This is infinitely MORE intrusive.patches70 wrote:Haha, the government is collecting data on everyone, bank transactions, passwords, email and everything else they can get a hold of. Information no one here would willingly share with anyone but it's ok for the government to get it?
Who here would like to go ahead and give me all their information? Bank accounts, transactions, passwords, emails, PM's and every key stroke you type every day? Recordings of every phone call? I'd bet no one would. But it's ok for the government to?
It's wrong. To me, it doesn't matter an iota which "party" is doing it. Then again, I am actually left wing. America doesn't have one.
Cute. Like he would be able to get through Congress with that.Metsfanmax wrote:What Snowden did is not responsible whistleblowing. Whistleblower laws, in this case, would protect executive branch employees for reporting this to Congress. Leaking a report to the press at large is not the same as whistleblowing, and it is a gross negligence of his duties.Phatscotty wrote: Yes, this traitor was aiding the enemy. The enemy being the rights of the American people, and he sold out the government.
Eh...some of the Green Party candidates can be pretty left-wing.ooge wrote:Left wing? a party of one,Bernie Sanders.jonesthecurl wrote:Night Strike wrote:And those same Democrats who are defending it now were complaining that Bush was going to find out what books you checked out at the library. This is infinitely MORE intrusive.patches70 wrote:Haha, the government is collecting data on everyone, bank transactions, passwords, email and everything else they can get a hold of. Information no one here would willingly share with anyone but it's ok for the government to get it?
Who here would like to go ahead and give me all their information? Bank accounts, transactions, passwords, emails, PM's and every key stroke you type every day? Recordings of every phone call? I'd bet no one would. But it's ok for the government to?
It's wrong. To me, it doesn't matter an iota which "party" is doing it. Then again, I am actually left wing. America doesn't have one.
and when they get in the congress I will add them to the list.Woodruff wrote:Eh...some of the Green Party candidates can be pretty left-wing.ooge wrote:Left wing? a party of one,Bernie Sanders.jonesthecurl wrote:Night Strike wrote:And those same Democrats who are defending it now were complaining that Bush was going to find out what books you checked out at the library. This is infinitely MORE intrusive.patches70 wrote:Haha, the government is collecting data on everyone, bank transactions, passwords, email and everything else they can get a hold of. Information no one here would willingly share with anyone but it's ok for the government to get it?
Who here would like to go ahead and give me all their information? Bank accounts, transactions, passwords, emails, PM's and every key stroke you type every day? Recordings of every phone call? I'd bet no one would. But it's ok for the government to?
It's wrong. To me, it doesn't matter an iota which "party" is doing it. Then again, I am actually left wing. America doesn't have one.
Do you know what Hong Kong is?ooge wrote:The rumor is Snowden may defect to China,if he does I will then change my vote to traitor.
BANGKOK (AP) — The British government has issued an alert to airlines around the world, urging them not to allow former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden to board flights to the United Kingdom.
The Associated Press saw a photograph of the document taken Friday at a Thai airport. A British diplomat confirmed that the document was genuine and was sent out to airlines around the world. A Thai airline also confirmed the alert had been issued.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/worl ... k/2422385/
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Do you know what Hong Kong is?[/quoteBigBallinStalin wrote:ooge wrote:The rumor is Snowden may defect to China,if he does I will then change my vote to traitor.
This is more like itPhatscotty wrote:noooo-ah!saxitoxin wrote:this guy?Phatscotty wrote:one of them who taught me some extremely valuable skills for life and even taught me a lot about how to be a man
going to Hong Kong is not the same as actually defecting to mainland China,The rumor was renouncing US citizen and defecting to China.AslanTheKing wrote:Do you know what Hong Kong is?[/quoteBigBallinStalin wrote:ooge wrote:The rumor is Snowden may defect to China,if he does I will then change my vote to traitor.
hong king, is china
ever been there?
Hong King is an excellent Chinese dish, complete with bamboo shoots and peanuts.AslanTheKing wrote:Do you know what Hong Kong is?[/quoteBigBallinStalin wrote:ooge wrote:The rumor is Snowden may defect to China,if he does I will then change my vote to traitor.
hong king, is china
ever been there?
These three are the reason why we know that reporting this to Congress is useless (they tried it):Metsfanmax wrote:What Snowden did is not responsible whistleblowing. Whistleblower laws, in this case, would protect executive branch employees for reporting this to Congress. Leaking a report to the press at large is not the same as whistleblowing, and it is a gross negligence of his duties.Phatscotty wrote: Yes, this traitor was aiding the enemy. The enemy being the rights of the American people, and he sold out the government.
Rejoice O young man in thy youth...
Phatscotty wrote:The task falls on us to pass on Freedom. If the youth grow up in a big brother police state mired in civil rights violations by our government, that means we failed.
Rejoice O young man in thy youth...

All this time, I thought Phatscotty was taking a piss on freedom.notyou2 wrote:Phatscotty finally admitting that he is all for taking a "pass on Freedom." Glad that you finally admitted you are all for the government trumping the rights of the people.Phatscotty wrote:The task falls on us to pass on Freedom. If the youth grow up in a big brother police state mired in civil rights violations by our government, that means we failed.
Well, if you don't play the game, then you get the fire. The cultures of bureaucracies can be amazingly childish, counter-productive, and petty. "Groupthink FTW" should be the motto for all of them.Woodruff wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html
So they're charging a spy...with spying.
I wonder if it feels ironic?