Moderator: Cartographers
reverend_kyle wrote:why isn't this quenched yet.
SkyCaptain wrote:I think the problem is that this is (To my knowledge at least) the first revamp of an existing map, so the procedure is still a bit confused. But since lack is getting back soon, I think Keyogi should check with him and get his opinion. Maybe then we can get this up on the site.
reverend_kyle wrote:why isn't this quenched yet.
Great Pretender wrote:the only problem i see is that when you put the armies numbers on, it completely spoiled the map.
KEYOGI wrote:I completely agree.
The foundry process states he has to reply to me with a reason not to do it or with the change before the map can be quenched.Coleman wrote:I wonder if the map would look less jarring with the army numbers if you put circles in... I know that's a pain, but it might help.
Coleman wrote:...with a reason not to do it or with the change...
I don't see how saying he prefers it another way isn't a reason not to do it, but so far he has completely ignored the suggestions as far as I can tell.hulmey wrote:the map maker can say i m going to do it this way coz i prefer it this way!!!
The reason the armies seem to spoil the map, and they do, is because they don't look like they belong. They are like plates without place mats. If we add the place mats, the circles, then it will probably look better.KEYOGI wrote:I completely agree.Great Pretender wrote:the only problem i see is that when you put the armies numbers on, it completely spoiled the map.