Moderator: Cartographers
vaughn...my sig gfx shows Q35 (quenched 35 maps - same with Beta 35) since 2007vaughn03 wrote:I said you were right - good call.
You don't have a 'cartography' designation..? I'll make your corrects - then I get The Gameplay Stamp or someone official has to give it to me..? Or..? And if I get it then..? Start coding? SOrry I may have read all this but it's been a long process...


WHAT MY INTENTION IS, IS THAT THEY CAN ONLY ATTACK WITHIN THIER OWN CONTINENT OR BONUS REGION (COLOR) - HOW DO I SAY THAT? BURMA AND MALAKA ARE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MAP AND HAVE 'ATTACK DOTS' CONNECTING THEM. DO I NEED TO BE MORE EXPLICIT?The troops part of the legend, you say that troops can only attack in their own coloured regions. Can you clarify this for me. Where is Burma and Malaka?
All sea connections are by Port to Fleet or by dotted path.
So troops can attack inside their own land regions. This would be a normal attack so it does not need to be in the legend at all. What you have is a normal way of attacking and unless you have something special or not normal, their is no need to spell it out in the legend. So taking Burma as an example, you can attack China, Laos, Siam, Malaka and Bangkok. Am I correct in this as all these regions touch or border Burma. Is there another region Burma can attack that I have missed?WHAT MY INTENTION IS, IS THAT THEY CAN ONLY ATTACK WITHIN THIER OWN CONTINENT OR BONUS REGION (COLOR) - HOW DO I SAY THAT? BURMA AND MALAKA ARE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MAP AND HAVE 'ATTACK DOTS' CONNECTING THEM. DO I NEED TO BE MORE EXPLICIT?The troops part of the legend, you say that troops can only attack in their own coloured regions. Can you clarify this for me. Where is Burma and Malaka?



If it is/is not required, it probably should be mentioned on the legendvaughn03 wrote:I think so... But all that is subject to adjustment, no..? I'm all ears.




