Do you think AK did the right thing when he deleted spamalot

Dmunster · Post by **Dmunster** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:26 pm

I clicked "yes" just cause I'm a player hater.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:27 pm

Vincent M wrote:I think this poll is Bullshit

ANDY if you are out there and reading this stuff please know what is right please.

The forum wont be the same after this

if you ask me, that ^^^ means more than anything else that has been said over this matter

willis · Post by **willis** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:28 pm

wicked wrote:My point was that DDS and willis (who both have spamalot in their sigs) hijacked the thread to talk about a game

A game which involved red bull, and when he asked us to stop spamming we stopped...

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:33 pm

it was a mistake now spam is going everywhere else, at least it was contained in a thread where the 13 and 14 year olds could spam until their heart was content

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:35 pm

BETTER EXAMPLE

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:41 pm

wicked wrote:BETTER EXAMPLE

not really, that was just one spammer

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:42 pm

wicked wrote:BETTER EXAMPLE

Wicked haven't you had enough. I think that search the forums diligently for little tiny Spam is ridiculous. Also funny you bring that up because Ranck 3 who also isnt part of Spamalot is possibly the worst Spammer on CC.

LOOK

People if the usergroup updates were ready, you would here from me or others often.

You can give a home to Spamalot and delete posts once and awhile

JUST GIVE US A PLACE TO COMMUNICATE AS A GROUP

BlindRacoon · Post by **BlindRacoon** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:43 pm

I don't even know what spamalot was *mourns* but being a spammer myself i love anything with teh word spam in it.

Please inform me of what it is.

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:48 pm

wicked wrote:BETTER EXAMPLE

Ahhhh, good times, good times....

That was hilarious and don't you try to deny it.

Ok, but all joking aside:
1. I was doing that to him as payback for him spamming up all manner of threads in the most annoying fashion possible; most of which were actually valid and didn't deserve spam blasting
2. He was the most annoying spammer I've ever seen, on any site. His actions deserved a response in kind
3. Yeah, I'm guilty of spamming there, that was a thread I spammed pretty damn hard. But I think it had a certain wit to it...

4. Oh c'mon; you laughed a little bit and/or you hated Ranck too :wink:

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:50 pm

Actually I fail to see the humor in it.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:53 pm

Vincent, ranck was the topic starter in that one. Your crew was the one who took over that thread. And I didn't go searching for that one, it was provided to me by someone who didn't think it was funny either.

If you want a group so bad, create an off-topic forum like other clans have done! From what I've heard, Rivals has been pushed back. Not sure of anything else about that, so don't ask.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:53 pm

wicked wrote:Actually I fail to see the humor in it.

but you can't judge the whole of spamalot on one spammers 10 minutes of madness

BlindRacoon · Post by **BlindRacoon** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:54 pm

What the **** is Spamalot? A thread where everyone spammed?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:55 pm

Diddle, do you understand the word example? Go look it up, we'll wait.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:55 pm

BlindRacoon wrote:What the **** is Spamalot? A thread where everyone spammed?

pretty much

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:55 pm

wicked wrote:Diddle, do you understand the word example? Go look it up, we'll wait.

get comfortable

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:58 pm

There are 24 different usergroups that are located within CC

How long does it take to put one more in there because one person in your staff messed up.

Why dont you rectify the situation.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:59 pm

Example - One of a number of things, or a part of something, taken to show the character of the whole: This painting is an example of his early work.

yes but not everybody in spamalot was like that, i bet you can't find anything bad about me (bar the forum ban)

willis · Post by **willis** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:02 pm

willis wrote:
wicked wrote:My point was that DDS and willis (who both have spamalot in their sigs) hijacked the thread to talk about a game
A game which involved red bull, and when he asked us to stop spamming we stopped...

EBWOP: and you locked it nearly an hour after we stopped talking in that thread. Why wait so long?

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:17 pm

Hecter and I were told by you wicked and AK that we could stay in that thread and that would be our home as a clan until the rivals update would come. We didnt even complain and we minded our own buisness and you cant honestly say that spam was AS MUCH of a problem as it is since Spamalot has been deleted. Multiple Threads have people randomly talking with nowhere to go. We were made promises that wouldn't be kept. One Thread thats all we wanted from you but you couldn't even give us that much.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:20 pm

No Vincent. I said keep your random talking to that one thread. I never said it was your clan thread. And you guys didn't keep it to that one thread anyway, so what's your point?

Seriously, I understand you want IC punished and this is what that's about, but why not just make another forum off-site?

dolemite · Post by **dolemite** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:27 pm

If spamalot's spamming was an issue, why weren't they given warning or told to stop? If the thread itself was an issue, why wasn't it locked by the 30th page or the 60th page?

Whether or not their spammy behavior is acceptable, this was completely mishandled by the moderators (and continues to be mishandled by the lack of communication or action).

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Dolemite, the matter is being reviewed thoroughly. This takes time. What other communication do you want? Andy's cell phone number? It's 1-800-CHIQUITA

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:30 pm

dolemite wrote:(and continues to be mishandled by the lack of communication or action).

BINGO

Thank you the response and care has been ridiculous

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:44 pm

Wicked you remember this pm

I said I had a feeling something bad was going to happen and the AK said to hecter that night via pm "I have a plan for tomorrow". I was worried so
I asked Wicked the night before Spamalot was deleted if she, AK, hecter and myself could have a chat about Spamalot.

Here was her response:

wicked wrote:uhh.. what are you talking about?

I replied back with "AK is seriously going to start trouble can't we all talk"

Here was her response:

wicked wrote:so talk to IC then. I'm busy.

I sent one to AK (IC if you want to call him that) and never got a reply.
In the morning all I saw was his name being the author and the view count was down to nothing. When I entered the thread he was happyily making fun of our members.

I hate to keep this going I want the facts out !

Do you think AK did the right thing when he deleted spamalot

Was he?