Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Now you're skimming also... jonty's only vote so far was a joke vote, that he was unvoting here. (Of course, his joke vote was against neb right after neb joke voted for safari... interesting... probably means nothing, but who knows lol)Anarkistsdream wrote: Also, I like how you say you are "sitting out" of this bandwagon, but you didn't did you? SAYING you sat out, when in fact you voted and unvoted, is still joining the bandwagon... And as soon as you saw one or two others drop their vote, you quickly drop it and say You are sitting out.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

Replace is one thing, and voting is another. Part of it is timing. If the person was around for several game days, then I favor the replace. If they were not, then I prefer to vote the submariner on Day 1 in lieu of better cases.Anarkistsdream wrote:jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
Hmmmm, care to show me all of these inactive voting instances? Because I have played more games than I can count with Safari, and I disagree. He ALWAYS chooses to replace. Because that is what a townie would do... Which is more reason to believe he is not in this game.
Also, I like how you say you are "sitting out" of this bandwagon, but you didn't did you? SAYING you sat out, when in fact you voted and unvoted, is still joining the bandwagon... And as soon as you saw one or two others drop their vote, you quickly drop it and say You are sitting out.
And the vote that was made on him wasn't due to his ignorance of a replacement for James, but how he reacted by the initial vote.
You and Safari are now the two most likely scum I have seen... And if I believed Saf a little more, than my vote would certainly be on you.

At first, I thought jonty had voted safari, but he hasn't, so there's nothing to go on here.jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
kratos is dealing with absolutes that safari must be either scum or a lyncher. There is the possibility that he is town.kratos644 wrote:This is a decent case as far as D1 standards go. Blatant skimming and wanting to lynch instead of replace. If he's not scum I would guess he's a lyncher just based on him trying to force that lynch. This puts him at 3 votes and hopefully closer to a claim. unvote vote safari
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Just a note...when you "unvote" you don't need to put the name of the person you had your vote on. Just type unvote.benga wrote:unvote virus90
i guess your joking... right?mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
Ultimately, the case on me was based on Meta. If I was Doom and said something you didn't like, that would be par for the course. However, if I was Doom, and uncommonly courteous, would that warrant a vote as well?Nebuchadnezer wrote:At first, I thought jonty had voted safari, but he hasn't, so there's nothing to go on here.jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
The wagon fell apart rather quickly...I was hoping to establish at least some more leads.
As it stands, this sticks out to me a small bit...
kratos is dealing with absolutes that safari must be either scum or a lyncher. There is the possibility that he is town.kratos644 wrote:This is a decent case as far as D1 standards go. Blatant skimming and wanting to lynch instead of replace. If he's not scum I would guess he's a lyncher just based on him trying to force that lynch. This puts him at 3 votes and hopefully closer to a claim. unvote vote safari
I am still bothered by safariguy, a veteran of this game, and his boneheaded vote. I wonder if I'm cutting him too much slack. Would I/we crucify any other player for making this "mistake"? Probably. However, I'm not sure I want to force the policy claim, as I've seen other vets make stupid mistakes on mechanics as well.
So, all this talking for no action from me.

rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.
Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburinimtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
All I said was I thought you were one of those two. When someone appears to be scummy you generally think they're mafia. Why I went with lyncher as my alternative was you went for a lynch on an inactive who had already been replaced. I will overlook that now that you have pointed out it wasn't changed on the original page, but at the time, it appeared as if you had one specific target that you wanted to get.safariguy5 wrote:Ultimately, the case on me was based on Meta. If I was Doom and said something you didn't like, that would be par for the course. However, if I was Doom, and uncommonly courteous, would that warrant a vote as well?Nebuchadnezer wrote:At first, I thought jonty had voted safari, but he hasn't, so there's nothing to go on here.jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
The wagon fell apart rather quickly...I was hoping to establish at least some more leads.
As it stands, this sticks out to me a small bit...
kratos is dealing with absolutes that safari must be either scum or a lyncher. There is the possibility that he is town.kratos644 wrote:This is a decent case as far as D1 standards go. Blatant skimming and wanting to lynch instead of replace. If he's not scum I would guess he's a lyncher just based on him trying to force that lynch. This puts him at 3 votes and hopefully closer to a claim. unvote vote safari
I am still bothered by safariguy, a veteran of this game, and his boneheaded vote. I wonder if I'm cutting him too much slack. Would I/we crucify any other player for making this "mistake"? Probably. However, I'm not sure I want to force the policy claim, as I've seen other vets make stupid mistakes on mechanics as well.
So, all this talking for no action from me.
I will FoS kratos for his assumption that I was mafia or lyncher. Mafia I could understand, but it seems odd to accuse lyncher. 13 man game is a bit too small to support lyncher in my opinion, and this is before getting into the discussion about when the right time is for a lyncher to push a bandwagon on the target.
I can state the obvious however and say that straight voting the target on Day 1 is most definitely not a good lyncher play WIFOM or not...
He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburinimtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I am ready to post something, but would like to hear others opinions on this matter of me being scum.Anarkistsdream wrote:He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburinimtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
So... If this is his first or second game, you would think he would WANT to participate... He doesn't have the experience, unless he has played elsewhere, to scummarine like that... And, he also would not be an effective Jester.
So.................. I am going with reverse REVERSE reverse psychology...
Vote: mtamburini
mtamburini wrote:I am ready to post something, but would like to hear others opinions on this matter of me being scum.Anarkistsdream wrote:He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburinimtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
So... If this is his first or second game, you would think he would WANT to participate... He doesn't have the experience, unless he has played elsewhere, to scummarine like that... And, he also would not be an effective Jester.
So.................. I am going with reverse REVERSE reverse psychology...
Vote: mtamburini
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
No need to curse. You can present your ideas in a calm and mature manor.Anarkistsdream wrote:mtamburini wrote:I am ready to post something, but would like to hear others opinions on this matter of me being scum.Anarkistsdream wrote:He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburinimtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
So... If this is his first or second game, you would think he would WANT to participate... He doesn't have the experience, unless he has played elsewhere, to scummarine like that... And, he also would not be an effective Jester.
So.................. I am going with reverse REVERSE reverse psychology...
Vote: mtamburini
How about you post something about the two people who have already accused you?
Don't drag the fucking day out... The method I see you presently using is "I'm just going to screw with the people playing and not try to play myself." Your job is to help town find scum, or, if you are scum, to kill all the town... When the only posts you have made are completely void of content and do nothing to progress the game, you are not giving people a very good impression.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I read the PM saying Im inactive in a game, not realizing I was in a game because I didnt check the notify me button. The notify me when someone posts button is a tool I use to know that someone has posted after something I have said. Now that I am more active and you dont even consider to look at what I said about my post? You immediately assume I thnk you both are mafia when I said there is a possiblity that you both are. I posted my 2 cases which are the more likely scenarios of what is going on.Anarkistsdream wrote:OK... I assume English isn't your first language... If it is... YIKES!
Why is the PM relevant to bring up? One, because, if you hadn't RECEIVED the PM, it may be understandable that you had forgotten about the game... Two, because the length of time it takes you to respond to a PM when it is prodding you to post is important... You play Risk, so you must at least log on twice a day to take your turns, assuming you are a good teammate and player, which, judging from your rank, you are... So why the time between the prod and your actual post?
If you are playing in three games and can't keep up, maybe it is time to ask to be replaced? Playing in three games for me is not that hard, and I am usually one of the most active players in ALL the games...
Third, I curse... a lot... In games, in RL, at work... I already DO tone it down for this, so, when I see someone being blatantly void of content in their posts, it pisses me off. This isn't "Annoy the other players around you." It is Mafia... Even this post I am responding to is fairly devoid of content... You just blanket that BOTH players who voted you MUST be mafia with complete assumptions that prove you obviously didn't read the arguments made against you. You also say you see mafia "potentially in both of us," but your rebuke is just stating that both of us MUST be mafia... So which is it?
If this is your concept of playing this game, expect to be lynched early and often...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I will not take your harassment much longer. I have given 2 valid reasons why one of you 2 could be mafia. Why are you on such a defensive side? Are you made that you have been caught by some one who has only posted once prior to today? I hear a lot of yelling and not enough scum hunting from you IMHO.Anarkistsdream wrote:You are CONVINCED that one of us COULD be mafia? Wow, thank you, Capt Obvious... ANYONE can be mafia, so saying you are convinced ONE of us COULD be is perhaps one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. You have given me no reason to unvote you, and if I turn you off about playing other games I am in, I can't say I am disappointed, because your play style sucks...
How about you actually read through the posts and make a rational argument, instead of gross generalizations, assumptions and nonsense?