strike wolf wrote:Flores has requested replacement.
Moderator: Community Team
strike wolf wrote:Flores has requested replacement.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.



silly thing to say. you had a good reason to vote him. People who are inactive should be pressured. i find it odd you feel "sorry" you pressured an inactive.rishaed wrote:strike wolf wrote:Flores has requested replacement.If that was gonna happen I wouldn't 'ave voted him. Next Time for sure.unvote. Everyone else seems somewhat active. I'll wait a day maybe to see what else is going on. However Rugbirn did say he was in for quality posting, still waiting for some in terms of things that have been discussed
I admit Caffiene is interesting, but I am going to hold off until tomorrow on him as well.


Honestly, that makes you sound a bit prickish... Be good or....X-Stor-X wrote:its baffling how people are not reading my case on iamcaffeine, specially my conclusion on if i think he is town or mafia.
Plenty can develop, the fact that you ignore the people i have called scum, and you are not talking about baffles me.
plz read the thread before you post, sorry if this is insulting but honestly.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

I have to somehow agree on this small case. rish's reaction is somewhat strange.... you knew the inactive would either try to post or throw the towel and pass on the relay to someone more active. I'm pretty happy of the outcome; mets will be active and knows the show. Big deal, right, you pressured an inactive and he got replaced.. trying to look super nice?X-Stor-X wrote:silly thing to say. you had a good reason to vote him. People who are inactive should be pressured. i find it odd you feel "sorry" you pressured an inactive.rishaed wrote:strike wolf wrote:Flores has requested replacement.If that was gonna happen I wouldn't 'ave voted him. Next Time for sure.unvote. Everyone else seems somewhat active. I'll wait a day maybe to see what else is going on. However Rugbirn did say he was in for quality posting, still waiting for some in terms of things that have been discussed
I admit Caffiene is interesting, but I am going to hold off until tomorrow on him as well.
unless you are too busy, i would like you to provide some input.

It's a game first and foremost. Do not attempt to dismiss that or act superior... You seriously need to take a moment to realize what you are saying... Everything thing is cool, but the insults and inconsideration needs to go, bro.X-Stor-X wrote:i said my read on iamcaffeine was neutral, and i've had several people take that as my #1 scum push.
sorry if im annoyed with people
and doesn't matter if im a prick or annoying or rude. Sorry if it makes your game less pleasant but i stated, im here to catch scum
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

hahaha you guys are taking it wrong. I was looking forward to playing another game with Floresbetiko wrote:I have to somehow agree on this small case. rish's reaction is somewhat strange.... you knew the inactive would either try to post or throw the towel and pass on the relay to someone more active. I'm pretty happy of the outcome; mets will be active and knows the show. Big deal, right, you pressured an inactive and he got replaced.. trying to look super nice?X-Stor-X wrote:silly thing to say. you had a good reason to vote him. People who are inactive should be pressured. i find it odd you feel "sorry" you pressured an inactive.rishaed wrote:strike wolf wrote:Flores has requested replacement.If that was gonna happen I wouldn't 'ave voted him. Next Time for sure.unvote. Everyone else seems somewhat active. I'll wait a day maybe to see what else is going on. However Rugbirn did say he was in for quality posting, still waiting for some in terms of things that have been discussed
I admit Caffiene is interesting, but I am going to hold off until tomorrow on him as well.
unless you are too busy, i would like you to provide some input.![]()
anyway... unvote flores/mets
fastposted twice
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

As I have already said, X-Stor-X OMGUS'd me, not vice versa.pancakemix wrote:Insufficient data. Seems goodnatured, but that speaks to the poster and not of his posts. There's nothing to read but inactivity, if you choose to read that.X-Stor-X wrote:well mr pancakemix, what do you think of cooldeals or virus?
Or do you have a scum read on someone you would like to share?
Town read. Definitely seems to be trying to help us make progress (see: the brief case on Rugbirn), perhaps a little offput (even suspicious) by your playstyle, which he sees as aggressive
My strongest scum read as of now is Caffeine. See above for that.


But, to get meta/WIFOM, that might be the wrong move, because everyone knows that stor is dominating the conversation, and it seems like he will eventually start yelling at the people who aren't contributing. Stor's gameplay isn't really tailored enough to discriminate between who's mafia and who is town on D1. The sheer volume of conversation to be generated means that it will not really be easier to catch scumtells.MoB Deadly wrote: With Stor here, the best mafia play would be to keep quiet and let him lead the way. Because using general probability, the chance of stor picking mafia on Day 1 is far less than town.

can you give an example for your betiko read?iAmCaffeine wrote:As I have already said, X-Stor-X OMGUS'd me, not vice versa.pancakemix wrote:Insufficient data. Seems goodnatured, but that speaks to the poster and not of his posts. There's nothing to read but inactivity, if you choose to read that.X-Stor-X wrote:well mr pancakemix, what do you think of cooldeals or virus?
Or do you have a scum read on someone you would like to share?
Town read. Definitely seems to be trying to help us make progress (see: the brief case on Rugbirn), perhaps a little offput (even suspicious) by your playstyle, which he sees as aggressive
My strongest scum read as of now is Caffeine. See above for that.
If you want to know my other townread is betiko because he keeps things moving but isn't diving in head first like Stor.

X-Stor-X wrote:what kind of scum tell are you looking for?
got an example?
side question, are you expecting to lynch a mafia on day 1? if you think its unlikely a scum will be lynched (insert what ever reason doesn't matter)
The reason im asking these questions, this is a new place and new meta. Im not sure how day 1 is played here. If its to wait for something to "happen" idk. all i can do is play my game. I have a plan to catch scum, im looking for peoples opinions, seeing how they match up vs my own. how believable are they with their reasons etc. I want a lynch to have some tension today, i don't want the lynch to be "welp we have to decide on 1 person so lets pick x" I want discussion on such target, to the point if that person flips town, we can look at the votes, see who was really pushing. if a scum is lynched, who spear headed it? etc.

QFT, i also dare say that If the first claim is a VT, its almost impossible to have enough town cred on D1 not to get lynched, no matter how believable. Its WCS/BCS thing.betiko wrote:X-Stor-X wrote:what kind of scum tell are you looking for?
got an example?
side question, are you expecting to lynch a mafia on day 1? if you think its unlikely a scum will be lynched (insert what ever reason doesn't matter)
The reason im asking these questions, this is a new place and new meta. Im not sure how day 1 is played here. If its to wait for something to "happen" idk. all i can do is play my game. I have a plan to catch scum, im looking for peoples opinions, seeing how they match up vs my own. how believable are they with their reasons etc. I want a lynch to have some tension today, i don't want the lynch to be "welp we have to decide on 1 person so lets pick x" I want discussion on such target, to the point if that person flips town, we can look at the votes, see who was really pushing. if a scum is lynched, who spear headed it? etc.
-people get fed up and bandwagon on any small goof to get a claim; and this time it fell on player A
-player A s claim is debated, then someone starts attacking player B because of the way he is reacting to player A's case
-either people are convinced about player A being scum and lynch him, either player B is forced to claim
-you then have 2 town claim wich in the end are quite believable, but people end up lynching one of them for science.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

More than likely to see a town lynch based on the balance of probability.X-Stor-X wrote: side question, are you expecting to lynch a mafia on day 1? if you think its unlikely a scum will be lynched (insert what ever reason doesn't matter)
I've not seen the show (answered that on monday, I think). My internet did not work yesterday, so I'm speaking from work. That and I hate the beginning of D1 (glad my dislike for that has been incorporated to my meta). Also didn't read since my last post, I just searched the forums for my name and saw this post of yours.betiko wrote:Rodion, get your ass in here. I know you never participate in day 1, but really.... you are by far the least participative.
have you seen the show? how many scum would you reckon we are facing? in case of no solid lead, what is your recommendation?