Well that got me reading back of which i left my notes in the spoiler, its a shitload of text. dont bother reading if you dont want to, these are my brief notes, on which i am forming an opinion, but you can skip all the text and just read the outcome if you want to save 10 minutes of your life.Nebuchadnezer wrote: And F%#@ all of you who call my case shit and are now voting Anarkistsdream. I don't know if any of you who are voting did call it crap, but it frustrates me that I put the best case of the day together and got laughed at for it. Yet, he will now get lynched, and I don't even get credit for the case...well, if he IS town, I guess I don't want credit.
I got on Superkeener, because I wanted another claim. Rolefishing? No. More like claim-fishing. I wanted something else to judge Anark and future claims by. Even if we get a PR, we should have plenty of power to protect him. I did buy into X-Stor's case that he was noncommittal and not adding anything while casting plenty of doubt all over.
I think Anark's fate has been sealed, so let's see what it brings...
Spoiler
Spoiler
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Warning: Long post!
First. WTF is Rugbirn doing here? Dude, you are a total distraction to this game. Are you even reading what you write? Please get it together...this is the type of play that WILL get you lynched. X-Stor-X is at least aggressive and has a point to his posting...you...not so much.
Rugbirn wrote:I agree with all your observations about narks VT claim, however, there is one thing that bothers me. Strike said that he assigned roles in the order of game sign-ups. Nark was actually the second to sign up. I have to wonder if (why) Strike actually assigned a VT (Badger? a minor role) to the second person, especially someone that is a veteran player......Thoughts?Rugbirn wrote:I disagree with pancake and anark. Here is Strike's post: "Role PMs are coming out in order of when you signed up. Please confirm as you get them."
If Anak is badger, (and #2) why couldn't Strike just have distributed the roles in alphabetical order to the order of sign-ups. Wild theory, but something to consider as we find out more about who is who. Virus, you were the first to sign up - who are you?Rugbirn wrote:Hey, just throwing it out there. Don't kill the messanger; said it was a wild theory! And it at least has some logic to it, as opposed to half the messgaes I've read here. Besides, maybe SW knows that role details are not revevant to most of you and decided to throw you a curve?Rugbirn wrote:I want to beleive Anark, but the way he keeps posting virus' "pat on the back" makes me think that they are part of the same scum clan.Now on to Anarkistsdream...Rugbirn wrote:Nark did I hit a nerve (or maybe the truth)? It only makes sense that you and virus are of the same clan. Nobody uses a signature to remind everyone how great they are.
A couple points from above ^Nebuchadnezer wrote:Dude...you done screwed up, son! At least wait for a wagon to form, so we get some info...I'm not a fan of what you did here. We might as well go ahead and get your full claim...VOTE AnarkistsdreamAnarkistsdream wrote:betiko wrote:Unvote vote nark
Seriously, wtf man? What a daft move. There s no vote count but basically, you just softclaim badger, vt just after a vote or 2? You know that if we find a VT we ll have no prob lynching you, a lot to gain and not that much yo lose.
Also, badger is a crappy enough character to be one of the fake claims.
Xstor s case on you was sloppy but what you did in response is extremely scummy!
So you admit that you would rather lynch a VT then keep him around? And you say I look scummy...
As for saying I was badger... That isn't what I did at all... I dropped clues in previous posts, not the one I was replying in...
Haven't people heard the term "badgering the witness?"
1. You quite clearly state that are NOT Badger. I'm sure you'll try to spin this somehow, but your post is pretty clear that you were not "saying I was badger."
2. I did not say I wanted to lynch you. I wanted your full claim. You can't come out with some cracked up VT claim that you breadcrumbed about, and then NOT give the full claim.
Next post...This is rather nice. It's a rather long one with lots of finger pointing going on...but it's essentially an OMGUS on anyone voting for you. Very nicely veiled, but still an OMGUS. Let's remember, you are the one with the half-claimed VT with a 2 vote pressure on you...You are the one who has been playing oddly quiet, and then suddenly coming up with a half VT claim when two people vote you. There surely could be mafia on your "wagon"...the percentages dictate that possibility...but percentages also dictate that I could name any 5 players and one of them are mafia. Your play was stupid and attracted attention. Votes were warranted. To come back with an OMGUS vote does you no favors.Anarkistsdream wrote:Actually, it is very commonly used in my line of work... The term, that is...betiko wrote:well to tell the truth it's the first time I ever hear the expression "to badger", so I guess it's not often used and that he could not have NOT thought of it... after talking about breadcrumbing. If you had written that post, wouldn't you have changed that verb with a synonym in order not to give a wrong clue?
Anyway, badger or combo, it's not very relevant. His "sin" isn't to be badger vs combo, it's to softclaim vt when he had so little pressure on his shoulders.
and to tell the truth I think I missed that part... did he say he got killed by a kid on a bike? I remember tha someone mentioned that sene here in the game, but I don't remember why and who..
Metsfan is the only one thinking all of this through, and for that, I say good on you, brother...
I have a strong suspicion that of the five people voting me, at least two of them will be scum, and, if enough townies are dumb enough to get behind the lynch of a vt, then they will be able to claim ignorance at a later time.
It is at this time that I finally start having reads on people, x-stor. See, before I can make decisions, I jave to give them something to talk/argue about. Just jumping on random people at the beginning doesn't work too well... As it stands, metsfan is most assuredly town, or is 3rd party with the towns best interests at heart.
Rugbirn, I think you are misinterpreting what Strike Wolf said about assigning roles. I also think Rugbirn is townish...
Pancake... It was a gambit on my part, but everyone was so fixated on x-stor that something epic had to be done to get the ball rolling. Another few days of that and we would have ended up having to rush lynch someone.
Now, of the five voting me, x-stor could just be as aggressive as I am, but he has been very overbearing all game, and it is easy to want to lynch the annoying person. TFO and I have not played much together, so I really have few reads on him. Betiko is town, I truly believe... Neb and Jonty both are.... well, the most likely scum on my wagon. They waited for several other votes to build up first, whih protects them from being accused of leading the wagon. They both basically said, we would rather lynch a VT then try to find scum, which is a super smart thing for mafia to do... Kill the VT during the day and look for PR at night... Remember, they know who is scum with them... At least their type of scum if there is a Fring/Cartel division.
Vote Neb
Next post from Anark...so NOW you ARE Badger? WTF...(scrolls back to top) Oh, yah, you said you were not Badger! But now you are...but wait...did you perchance...LIE?Anarkistsdream wrote:Excellent catch on MoB...cooldeals wrote:Also Anark I think a full claim is inevitable from you. It seems you've already seen who has jumped on your wagon, may as well finish off the claim unless I missed it
And of course I am Badger... So, that makes me assume Skinny Pete is out there somewhere, too.
Subtle indeed...I was just hoping for a name claim from you. But after looking at your actions and posts, I can't believe the rest of town is letting you get away with this crap. You can have "gut" feelings all you want about Anark, but he's had plenty of mistakes here. I'm at the point where I will continue to wonder if he is town or faking it, and just pulled the wool over our eyes.Anarkistsdream wrote:Also, I love how you call what I did a "crime..."
Hahaha. Very subtle
So, I'm going to summarize...
1. Rugbirn is playing like a douche.
2. Anarkistsdream claims VT after two votes.
3. Anarkistsdream lies about his name claim.
4. Anarkistsdream OMGUSs anyone voting him.
My vote stays.
Spoiler
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Asking the mod for a post count? Do it yourself.superkeener wrote:I like the setup talk as well, however it is all speculation at this point. We will continue to put the pieces together. However, a tentative foundation of possible roles is also a plus.
To mod: Is there anyway we can get a post count or something similar so we can see the inactives to get the proddings started?
Dude...you done screwed up, son! At least wait for a wagon to form, so we get some info...I'm not a fan of what you did here. We might as well go ahead and get your full claim...VOTE AnarkistsdreamAnarkistsdream wrote:betiko wrote:Unvote vote nark
Seriously, wtf man? What a daft move. There s no vote count but basically, you just softclaim badger, vt just after a vote or 2? You know that if we find a VT we ll have no prob lynching you, a lot to gain and not that much yo lose.
Also, badger is a crappy enough character to be one of the fake claims.
Xstor s case on you was sloppy but what you did in response is extremely scummy!
So you admit that you would rather lynch a VT then keep him around? And you say I look scummy...
As for saying I was badger... That isn't what I did at all... I dropped clues in previous posts, not the one I was replying in...
Haven't people heard the term "badgering the witness?"
Spoiler
pancakemix basicly said: " but since your remaining case is largely based on him flip-flopping on claiming Badger, I don't know that it holds water."
rishead dodged the case focused grammer/meaning technicalitys
I am caffeine: "i Believe Nark is townsided
superkeener basicly says: i think he is Saul, maybe badger, maybe skiny pete, maybe a combo (my personal short version of his post)
xstorx says all should vote before monday
medsfanmax says: ok i vote you.
rishead votes medsfanmax because of his "snippy comment"
xstor x makes a case changing to superkeener
pancakemix "votes"virus (deliberately does not unvote jokevote = voting in my opinion)
IB votes superkeener
virus votes superkeener
nebudchanazer changes vote to superkeener
metsfanmax: xstorx case is awfull
betiko: "this superkeener wageon is quitte funny"
rodion: believes nark is town
(page 26 by now)
rugbirn: votes anarkistdream
iamcaffeine: the wagon on superkeener is funny
vote count at that point:
Superkeener (4) x-stor, iron butterfly, virus, neb
Anarchist (3) betiko, Jonty125, rugbirn
superkeener: i believe nark is town, votes IB
betiko: on the superkeener wagon "i find the wagon terribly oportunistic and probably scummy."
mob deadly: vote Anarkist
mod deadly makes a list with scummy / good people (page 27) - me and anarkist scummy, rugbirn somewhat. mod deadly points out not liking superkeener bandwagon
cooldeals - votes anarkist
iamcaffeine: vote IB
anarkist point out we are wasting time quoting eachothers refernces as agreeing to it. with the 2 bandwagons (page 28)
jonty: my vote stays anarkist
anarkist: vote jonty
metsfanmax: I plan to push on IB pretty hard for his scummy bandwagoning onto the superkeener case
xstorx votes virus (me)
TFO vote IB
votecount:
Anarkist (5)-betiko, Jonty125, rugbirn, mob deadly, cooldeals
Ironbutterfly (3)-Superkeener, iamcaffeine, Theforgivenone
Superkeener (3)-iron butterfly, Virus, neb
rishead votes anarkist
pancakemix: i still think virus is a far better choice for a lynch, points out rugbirn is also scummy
mob deadly: stresses why he votes anarkist
xstorx point out gregwolf lurking but not saying anything
metsfanmax and xstorx discuss mets opinion of superkeener wagon scummy
final vote count:
Anarkist (6)-betiko, Jonty125, rugbirn, mob deadly, cooldeals, Rishaed
Ironbutterfly (3)-Superkeener, iamcaffeine, Theforgivenone
Superkeener (3)-iron butterfly, Virus, neb
Virus90 (2)-Pancake, x-stor
x-stor-x (2)-Nagerous, Metsfanmax
Jonty125 (1)-Anarkist
how the hell did they get our doc N1... plane luck i guess?
and luckily a goon gone, but im afraid he only got killed by another thread to town. or some pro-town role took a huge risk, but i dont believe that.
@jonty, soft claiming you have something to do with meth?
Spoiler
jonty125 wrote:Well good news pcm is dead, bad news Neb is dead. Pcm's death is interesting. I have two thoughts - strongman kill or delayed PGO, Walt was busy (now I've never seen BB so I'm not sure if this would be too OOC for WW, but someone just killed his wife, so I could imagine any sane person doing it, but he cooks meth, so can he be sane, but then again he doesn't smoke it, so he might still be sane)
A bit waffly, must be the meth.
FASTPOSTED x9!!!!!!!! Are you guys on meth are summat
@metsfanmax: who cares if skyler is accountant in the series.... not to insult you but a useless post in my opinion...
[off topic] @x....x: i like your vote count colour thing:) [off topic]
my opinion:
why was nebud targeted ? was it because he was voting superkeener? i was suspicious of superkeener, did not get much better yet... just after the votecount where he was in the lead he voted IB, got some people with him. But before that time IB was already voting on him, so not best one to point finger at. the whole saul/badger/third guy thing is weird to me.. i just dont get it... but in the end he did not join the anarkist vote, he said he thought he was town..
he is one of my possibles..
Rugbirn: another possible...
was on the anarkist wagon, late (after nebud removed his vote if im not misstaken)
has not said much (even less then i did probably, i guess thats kind of a achievement if i have to believe all of you calling me suspicious)
could be not even reading this threat carefully... i just dont know...
rishead...
well he basicly said nothing with a opinion, just smalltalk, then came late in the voting party with a vote on mets, quickly withdrew, then voted anarkist i dont get why, he could have voted him when he voted mets, but only did so very late.
He deserves my vote for now:
Vote rishead
oh and to those seeing me around: i am, i try to read few times a day to keep up to date, but since i like to reread big parts to form opinions, and post huge posts like this, i am not always posting when im reading.






