Gweeedo wrote:Not Exactly.
DNA Is a language system in and of itself (life). God created man in his own image...All who know God have been here from the beginning. Life is the Creator, the creator is life.
The language that is there enables the DNA to make the language that reads the DNA to make the language.
It has all got to be there or it will not work.
From a perspective of those who believe in evolution; you got to say matter by itself actually produce a language system and had to produce information.
What you observe is exactly the opposite of what evolutionist require.
You're skipping ahead of yourself a bit here. You can't go (1) DNA is a language (Conclusion) God. We need to see your working. Also you seem to be defining God here as "life" which is bio-pantheism not christianity.
Also you seem a bit confused. "DNA is the language that lets DNA talk to DNA". That's equivalent to saying "Russian words are the language that let russian words talk to russian words". For something to qualify as a language it has to be a form of communication between two things that allows for the transfer of information between those two things. Russian speaking people are not russian language, the two are distinct and separate.
I don't deny that we can look at DNA and get information from it, but we can also look at snowflakes and get information from them about highly complex crystalline structures.
Gweeedo wrote:I understand this might not be the information you were looking for.
But to those who might believe man evolved from apes...it might give doubt.
I thought this was very interesting. It is not my life nor my idea, as proof of Gods existence.
It's not evidence of anything. Even if we ignored the problems with your position so far and said that we agree with what you're saying about DNA being a language and it was created by a mind, it still tells us precisely nothing about that mind. Yeah sure it could be the christian God, but it could equally be Zeus or Thor or Allah or Ajbit (one of the Mayan creator Gods) or aliens from another planet or interdimensional beings or any one of a million others things.
Gweeedo wrote:History might be the proof you need.
For thousands of years people have been fighting, worshiping, living, dying in the name of GOD.
Maybe the actions and beliefs of the patriarchs (all who believe) of the Bible, brought about the incarnation (the word became flesh) of God.
History is all the proof I need...irrefutable.
For large parts of history people thought that some really weird things were true. People have also died for things that we now know are just plain untrue. Think of all the people that have followed all the now dead religions and died in the name of those Gods. Does that prove that Thor and Zeus are real too? Just because there have been a lot of people in history who thought something was true has absolutely no bearing on whether that thing is actually true. Stating something as irrefutable doesn't make it so...
Gweeedo wrote:Israeli war (Yom Kippur War); a war that began on Yom Kippur in 1973 with the attack of Israel by Egypt, Syria, and Iraq: No chance for Israel, if not for God.
If you're now defining God as "massive American logistical support including shipping in large numbers of tanks, guns, etc" than yeah you're correct. Unfortunately I don't think I've ever heard of God being defined that way... Also worth noting is that the Americans did this because Israel was basically threatening to nuke their enemies and the americans didn't want a nuclear war being started.
Gweeedo wrote:It is not you who get to choose, it is God who chooses you.
No reason for God having to prove himself to you.
If God came down today and showed himself to you...tomorrow you would not believe.
if you find yourself standing with the goats, when in Heaven, you will know you are in trouble...if you see me standing next to you, don't make a sound...Bahhh
That's a pretty big statement. I wouldn't believe if confronted with God himself. f*ck off! You cannot tell me what I would or would not believe or under what conditions.
And the plain fact is Gweeedo that I'm the only one actually engaging you on this because EVERY SINGLE thing you've said has been said before multiple times in this thread and it has been explained to all of those people exactly all of the same things I'm explaining to you. I could easily have just given you a link back 30 pages instead, and then 40 pages before that, and then 20 pages before that. None of what you're saying is groundbreaking and new, it's the same flawed arguments started by the same creationist hacks that we've been hearing for ages now.