Moderator: Community Team

I think it strains credulity to think anyone would at that point.Do you disagree with the statement that people voting virus for early day 1 stuff is bad this late in the vote?
Or it's a basic distancing play that you pushed too far and it got out of hand. You don't have to coordinate that.Lastly it's a really big conspiracy that I had this all set up from day 1, 0 talking to virus pregame. Forced his claim, and then try to hero mode save him.
Wait, you're giving up? I'm legitimately on the fence here about your claim, but I have some doubts about your actions and your role. You could answer those questions and maybe sway me but if you're content to be lynched, I'm content to leave my vote where it is.I'm done defending. Going to use the rest of my time to present detailed reads on every single one of you.
I actually did address this (post-lynch, but nevertheless I did). Batman famously has a no-kill rule. So...Sorry can you explain why a 1 shot town vig named batman is a bad claim again? In a small game
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:Or it's a basic distancing play that you pushed too far and it got out of hand. You don't have to coordinate that.Lastly it's a really big conspiracy that I had this all set up from day 1, 0 talking to virus pregame. Forced his claim, and then try to hero mode save him.
I could have switched targets at anytime. I didn't
Wait, you're giving up? I'm legitimately on the fence here about your claim, but I have some doubts about your actions and your role. You could answer those questions and maybe sway me but if you're content to be lynched, I'm content to leave my vote where it is.I'm done defending. Going to use the rest of my time to present detailed reads on every single one of you.
It might appear that i am "giving up" but that is far from the case. I'm mostly just overly exhausted with trying to prove how town i was day 1. And its making no head way, anything i say is meet with "how ever" or "you probably set it up that way to use it as a defense latter" Either way, most people are not actually reading any actions i made day 1, save for the last pull off of virus. I may now and then present something new for my defense. If something comes up. So I'm going to use the rest of my time (yes i state i have limited time for a reason) Pushing people i find scummy, And presenting my town reads. As for my limited time, The entire town is not interested in another lynch at this point. No one is even considering James, or anyone else for that matter.
As far as your reads themselves, I'm not gonna disregard them, but they're not gonna hold as much weight unless you take the log out of your own eye first.
I need you to be more specific. From my point of view, if i am lynched today, i will flip town. My reads then will become valid, because i will be confirmed town.I actually did address this (post-lynch, but nevertheless I did). Batman famously has a no-kill rule. So...Sorry can you explain why a 1 shot town vig named batman is a bad claim again? In a small game
See this is actually very crappy. The idea of a fake claim is to blend in with town. Virus had a real mafia name, and he had a fake name which was Batman, his town name. Picking at the name batman to find scummy, is actually just picking at flavor. The mod fully intended batman to be viewed as "a town vigilante" because that is what he is. I personally don't find any enjoyment at picking apart claims. (look at breaking bad when we caught a mafia basically because he claimed a watcher role, and his name was some obscure police guy. So many people pushed that as a scummy claim it wasn't funny. That was breaking the flavor of the game. The mod again fully intended that name to be looked upon as a townie name) As i've stated before, i view the game from a different angle, i don't try to generally break the game off flavor, i try to find scummy people on their actions and how they play the game.
On meta: It has its place. I'm hesitant to take it as law, though. Sometimes things change depending on what happens in one game or another, and sometimes we adjust our play. Maybe your play is similar to another game where you were town, but I can't say for certain if that's a rule or if you're saying that to throw me off. Honestly, I shudder to think I'd be that predictable in a game.
I'm not saying to use it as law, You happened to be in both games as well. People can read into that. I know exactly what i could say that would make me look super townie from the 2 games. Unless someone wants to me to say it ill refrain from presenting my defense from that angle. Hell, look at mets one of his new reasons now is to lynch me now over policy because using meta is "poor form"





This suggests that there was a pool of roles at the beginning and alignments are randomly assigned along with the roles as opposed to being fixed to them, which would explain why virus was a vig on the mafia side. It would also mean that Storr is probably telling the truth about is role, but the point is moot because he could just as easily still be scum.i have a list of roles and set ups. The set ups depend on how many sign up but the roles are completely independent and will be randomly selected regardless of it's affect on balance
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
OK, but what the hell does this have to do with anything that has happened so far?StorrZerg wrote:Correction on how it would look
scum nuts -mafia role blocker has killed Reginald Philman-Town Crier
This is mod confirmed. Which my role does.
Also you're skirting with a mod killable offense. Saying that the mod has confirmed that this is how your role works confirms that you do actually have this role, which is information you cannot post.Metsfanmax wrote:OK, but what the hell does this have to do with anything that has happened so far?StorrZerg wrote:Correction on how it would look
scum nuts -mafia role blocker has killed Reginald Philman-Town Crier
This is mod confirmed. Which my role does.
Is it? I have never used that in the few games I have modded.Iron Butterfly wrote:It is standard play here at CC that mafia shoots and serial killers chop or kill.
OK now it is clear. I was under the assumption that it was how someone was killed or other such info. You never specifically said the role and alignment would be revealed.StorrZerg wrote:Correction on how it would look
scum nuts -mafia role blocker has killed Reginald Philman-Town Crier
This is mod confirmed. Which my role does.

Yes it is. My point was about serial killers killing with knives and mafia with guns, which is why I said what I said about Stoors role above. I misunderstood how the role worked as he was not fully clear.jonty125 wrote:Is it? I have never used that in the few games I have modded.Iron Butterfly wrote:It is standard play here at CC that mafia shoots and serial killers chop or kill.
I am content with lynching virus today & I didn't jump on "suddenly" on D2, I did vote you early on D1, but then virus claimed. (or at least that is how I remember it).

My opinion on myself changed with the flip of virus as mafia. I eagerly await anything that could "prove" i wasn't on myself last night.Streaker wrote:Don't worry, I'm here. I just did a quick read through the posts, as I said, I was out of town for a few days (which I mentioned before).
What I see is that Storr has a hole in his story, that he feared he'd be killed this night. There is a post where he states he will definitely NOT be killed due to protection going to him.
Also, I am 100% sure Storr did not use his power on himself. Give me a bit more time to get back to this.
Further, I am wanting to build a case on Jonty, but no time for now. I should be able to post something more extensive by Saturday lastest.

Not to be an asshole right now. If you had read any of the exchange between me and IRON you would realize he is trying to extrapolate evidence of the set up of the game based on flavor of the kills. Hence i showed him what "mod confirmed" information would look like if my power went off. Hence i am not skirting with any mod kill able offense. You are clearly miss reading the exchange between myself and iron.Metsfanmax wrote:Also you're skirting with a mod killable offense. Saying that the mod has confirmed that this is how your role works confirms that you do actually have this role, which is information you cannot post.Metsfanmax wrote:OK, but what the hell does this have to do with anything that has happened so far?StorrZerg wrote:Correction on how it would look
scum nuts -mafia role blocker has killed Reginald Philman-Town Crier
This is mod confirmed. Which my role does.

You're missing my point, which is independent of your exchangedwith IB. By saying that the mod confirmed that this is what your role would like if activated, you're saying the mod confirmed you have that role. The mod couldn't tell you what the role would look like if you don't have it.StorrZerg wrote:Not to be an asshole right now. If you had read any of the exchange between me and IRON you would realize he is trying to extrapolate evidence of the set up of the game based on flavor of the kills. Hence i showed him what "mod confirmed" information would look like if my power went off. Hence i am not skirting with any mod kill able offense. You are clearly miss reading the exchange between myself and iron.Metsfanmax wrote:Also you're skirting with a mod killable offense. Saying that the mod has confirmed that this is how your role works confirms that you do actually have this role, which is information you cannot post.Metsfanmax wrote:OK, but what the hell does this have to do with anything that has happened so far?StorrZerg wrote:Correction on how it would look
scum nuts -mafia role blocker has killed Reginald Philman-Town Crier
This is mod confirmed. Which my role does.
report my post then if you feel its unjust. If he feels i did wrong, i will be mod killed. Then you guys will have 3 days to figure out how to lynch a mafia since town confirmed storrzerg will be dead.Metsfanmax wrote:You're missing my point, which is independent of your exchangedwith IB. By saying that the mod confirmed that this is what your role would like if activated, you're saying the mod confirmed you have that role. The mod couldn't tell you what the role would look like if you don't have it.StorrZerg wrote:Not to be an asshole right now. If you had read any of the exchange between me and IRON you would realize he is trying to extrapolate evidence of the set up of the game based on flavor of the kills. Hence i showed him what "mod confirmed" information would look like if my power went off. Hence i am not skirting with any mod kill able offense. You are clearly miss reading the exchange between myself and iron.Metsfanmax wrote:Also you're skirting with a mod killable offense. Saying that the mod has confirmed that this is how your role works confirms that you do actually have this role, which is information you cannot post.Metsfanmax wrote:OK, but what the hell does this have to do with anything that has happened so far?StorrZerg wrote:Correction on how it would look
scum nuts -mafia role blocker has killed Reginald Philman-Town Crier
This is mod confirmed. Which my role does.

Sure. I didn't have strong feelings that virus was scum in terms of his playstyle. My point was that was an unconfirmable role and it was overall in town's best interests to lynch him, because there was a strong probability that he was mafia. I ended up being right, and there was definitely some luck in there, but the point was that I believe the claim forced me to make that vote. You decided that everything was cool and he was probably town despite no possible evidence to that effect, which is what I was criticizing. The people who didn't vote virus weren't massively wrong to fail to do so, but I think there were good reasons to do so and you're ignoring them.StorrZerg wrote:
It seem to me, if he really was a town vig that was 1 shot. You would have lynched him any ways over principle. So i ask again. What specifically didn't you like about his claim.
In all your posts about him and his claim, you fail to say that his claim sounds scummy or fake. It really sounds like you lynched virus on 1. principle because of his claim 2. to secure a lynch.
i don't think either of those reasons are scummy, but they are not alignment indicative regarding your feelings on virus.

That is called lynching for policy. Not lynching because you think he is scum. I did not state i thought he was town. NEVER. i said he might be town, and "if he was town" talking from his point of view, what he should do to help town. My policy belief in letting him prove himself was conditional on him doing something. I was going to hammer him. I gave him time, while i was playing league of legends myself. I had my alarm set to make sure i didn't miss the dead line to insure the hammer. We both made a call on virus based on policy. You made your call on him saying he should die. I gave my call saying he could prove himself.Metsfanmax wrote:Sure. I didn't have strong feelings that virus was scum in terms of his playstyle. My point was that was an unconfirmable role and it was overall in town's best interests to lynch him, because there was a strong probability that he was mafia. I ended up being right, and there was definitely some luck in there, but the point was that I believe the claim forced me to make that vote. You decided that everything was cool and he was probably town despite no possible evidence to that effect, which is what I was criticizing. The people who didn't vote virus weren't massively wrong to fail to do so, but I think there were good reasons to do so and you're ignoring them.StorrZerg wrote:
It seem to me, if he really was a town vig that was 1 shot. You would have lynched him any ways over principle. So i ask again. What specifically didn't you like about his claim.
In all your posts about him and his claim, you fail to say that his claim sounds scummy or fake. It really sounds like you lynched virus on 1. principle because of his claim 2. to secure a lynch.
i don't think either of those reasons are scummy, but they are not alignment indicative regarding your feelings on virus.

I'm not going to "report" you. I'm pointing out that it's information we just cannot use. If you're telling the truth, that means the mod is confirming your claimed role exists because why else would he answer a question about how a town crier's information would appear in a day scene? And even if that's actually the case, then strike wolf could never confirm that he said it because the mod is never supposed to confirm someone's alignment or the existence of various roles in the game. The specific role you described is something I've never heard of and has certainly got to be a rare role. If we were to even ask strike how a town crier's information would appear in this game, and he verified what you said, then he'd essentially be confirming that the role is in the game, because usually the town crier does something completely different than what you have described.StorrZerg wrote: report my post then if you feel its unjust. If he feels i did wrong, i will be mod killed. Then you guys will have 3 days to figure out how to lynch a mafia since town confirmed storrzerg will be dead.
I was not pointing out that my role was mod confirmed. I was pointing out what mod confirmed information would look like in a day post with deaths. (which is why my role has relevance and what it does)
Because I'm tired of your shenanigans. But, see above.Also btw mets, why did you not respond to the claim question.
Thank you for that very helpful insight. I was completely aware of what I was doing. The point is, we got it right and you didn't. And now you're hardcore defending your incorrect call. I'm not saying it's the scummiest behavior, but you were calling people like James out for not jumping on your original wagon against virus, so it just makes you look stupid.That is called lynching for policy. Not lynching because you think he is scum.
It is absolutely because you are scum. You obviously misunderstood my post. No member of town who has town's best interests at heart would use the type of tactics you are using. You're throwing every single argument you can think of at us to confuse the situation instead of speaking with a clear message about what the situation is. Complaining about your situation is helping no one and if you are town you'll recognize that the lynch is inevitable and therefore be helpful to us instead of sowing dissent.Honestly is this just not pathetic that my lynch focus has shifted this much, it is no longer because i am scum