Moderator: Community Team


(the self preservation thing is fine imo)jonty125 wrote:Self-preservation (not sure if I'm in time or not so I'm not going to risk a long post vote Storr

I guess the tie is up to me. This would be a good excuse perhaps if had contributed anything to his defense at all. Going several pages back he has offered nothing. He has offered no startegy, except to jump on everyone else wagon. while Storr is passionate jonty has been a lethargic lump. He claims after a push is made and states who he targeted. Targeting DJ does not prove that DJ is mafia or Town but it does prove that Jontys claim may be real. he could be Mafia, Town or even Third party.jonty125 wrote:Self-preservation (not sure if I'm in time or not so I'm not going to risk a long post vote Storr


Think he meant that if typed out a long post he was going to miss the deadline for the end of the day.StorrZerg wrote:mets whats your thought on jonty last post? (anyone else can give their thought too)
(the self preservation thing is fine imo)jonty125 wrote:Self-preservation (not sure if I'm in time or not so I'm not going to risk a long post vote Storr
But what about the not "risking" a long post?
Please tell me what of this is new information or even valuable. Because it sounds like it came from somebody looking for a pretext to get jonty lynched. Some people look at big long posts and say "That's content" and vote. Some look and say "That's not much" (e.g., me and spiesr). Some people are scum and say "That's what I needed" (e.g. Streaker, and probably you). That's not a direct answer to your request, but it's plenty enough. He's been doing fine just coasting by for you but that's, I think, evidence of your guilt.Streaker wrote:So James, all we need to give you is a 'clean' night, in a game where EVERYONE has a power? And mafia has to cooperate as well?
I hate changing my votes around like this, but I always said I was more interested in lynching jonty for reasons stated. I also believe we get more information from lynching him, especially about DJ.
I'd also like to add that any discussion about balancing power roles (i read something Storr said about town not having any investigative roles is unlikely) is moot, in a game called 'balance not included'.
Unvote, vote jonty
And that's still a ridiculous claim. Ask anyone else in this game if replacement should have been considered at that point. You thinking I'm scum over that is ludicrous.The more accurate word is deflection.
He probably should have. But if you're being intimidating with your vote, it might feel like he's being forced. It's also forced in another regard: that there's really very little to it. Half of it is actually him giving Jonty points or staying neutral. He ends it with a vote, but it feels halfhearted.The james read on jonty.
Forced, not really. I wanted him to convince me to not vote him and vote jonty. He only has 2 options today. He could have just pushed me instead.
Yeah, you need to go back and reread what he wrote because you clearly didn't understand.As for Speirs, yes I'm informing him of his options. Not opinions.
As well as his no lynch thing about me was not as black and white.
No idea what your NL comments are about.
I do. I trust them to do it themselves. Trying to orchestrate town's actions is asking for them to get fucked with. On top of that, you are highly under suspicion and you think you have a right to dictate what the town should do? THAT is laughable.Nah. Strongly disagree that directing actions are scummy. If I'm lynched my opinion on actions become super valid. Also mets gave a suggestion to james on what to do, why didn't you fault him?
I would hope you care that people make a smart choice about their actions. You have to admit if james checked streaker if i was lynched would be very laughable.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Yes, we can all agree that it is better if James (or whoever) posts more. The disagree there is that you claimed that his post level provided you with some sort of information that made you think his alignment was scum. Others (like pancakemix and I) felt that his activity was independent of his alignment in this case.StorrZerg wrote:But at the end, getting james to talk was productive.
Most likely he was referring that either the deadline hitting or him reaching the vote threshold before he finish typing out a long post.StorrZerg wrote:But what about the not "risking" a long post?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.

Why the hell would you receive your investigation results today instead of during the night? Please explain how you KNOW you were bus driven?JamesKer1 wrote:Vote Jonty for being scum?
Just kidding... Nice to have you back. Looks like a crazy night.
Luckily, I investigated someone who didn't die, and I should get those results back soon as proof of my role.

Mod sent after scene was posted, just a little bit of a differenceIron Butterfly wrote:Why the hell would you receive your investigation results today instead of during the night? Please explain how you KNOW you were bus driven?JamesKer1 wrote:Vote Jonty for being scum?
Just kidding... Nice to have you back. Looks like a crazy night.
Luckily, I investigated someone who didn't die, and I should get those results back soon as proof of my role.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.