Moderator: Community Team
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
I don't think it's overly paranoid in the slightest, I think it fits the storyline perfectly. Let's see there were things that sucked out all the happiness under the magical councils control in some stories and others where they weren't. There were constantly characters in the story that had their own agenda and multiple times help or hinder Harry whether they would have normally done it or not. Rita chick with the news who didn't care what the hell was going on as long as the story was good. The Magical council that went after Dumbledore claiming knowing nothing, the Phoenix group of under cover supporters, the death eaters of varying support since V left that did much there own thing with no real threat of him returning, and then the hardcore death eaters. Not to mention the kids in school who depending on what contest they were in, what spell they were under, or general attitude of the day, would dictate how they would act.StorrZerg wrote:
Also Talapus with the overly paranoid approach to the game, or knowing to much
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
I don't think it's overly paranoid in the slightest, I think it fits the storyline perfectly. Let's see there were things that sucked out all the happiness under the magical councils control in some stories and others where they weren't. There were constantly characters in the story that had their own agenda and multiple times help or hinder Harry whether they would have normally done it or not. Rita chick with the news who didn't care what the hell was going on as long as the story was good. The Magical council that went after Dumbledore claiming knowing nothing, the Phoenix group of under cover supporters, the death eaters of varying support since V left that did much there own thing with no real threat of him returning, and then the hardcore death eaters. Not to mention the kids in school who depending on what contest they were in, what spell they were under, or general attitude of the day, would dictate how they would act.StorrZerg wrote:Also Talapus with the overly paranoid approach to the game, or knowing to much
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!

Cheers, budvirus90 wrote:first off, i dont see why ragian should be replaced for not knowing the theme, as long as you/he enjoys the game i think he should be ok.
just ask anything you like.
Noted.charm wrote:Rage and Tank - go watch the movies.
This raises some suspicion in me and it always has when someone wants to figure out the setup D1. Surely, we can't and it has always struck me as scummy tactics in order to sort out one's fakeclaim if needed (i.e. get people to venture guesses based on their own roles in order to figure out what is out there). I get the town vs. non-town ratio guessing, but the rest seems fog to me. FoS.charm wrote: Also we should determine what some of the roles are in this 24 player game then try and identify some of the players.
How many town - 15-18?
Power roles?
How many mafia - 6-8?
Survivors - 1-3? We know of Filch (storr)
Serial Killer - 1?
Vig - 1?
We can assume that some of the key players are in the game - Harry, Hermione, Ron Weasley, Hagrid, Snape, Dumbledore, few other teachers.Voldermort would be mafia - I'll be watching the movies this weekend and will help to pull together a more comprehensive list of list of the the death eaters in the movie so we can hopefully figure out who to target.

Well, I'm not as interested anymore in figuring out roles because I left all my books and movies in Montana. I've only played mafia less than a dozen times and was almost always vanilla town. So, I have a more difficult time figuring out the mafia roles and how they can get the town. Also, I really like the flavor and always thought we were supposed to play to the game storyline. I guess what you are telling me is that we don't have to know anything about the story or play it. I'm now really confused, I better hit some books and figure it out.Streaker wrote: Say charm, why are you so interested in getting some of the roles out? We already have 2 claims (or soft claims, at least). I'd agree that I would want to see Sempai be taken to L-2 and a claim, but imo that should be enough for D1 to make a decision on who to lynch.
A list of the death eater characters in the books/movies would be helpfull, but do we seriously expect scum to not have fake claims? Rather put pressure on the scummy players now, that should be priority not the list you suggest.
A FOS on charm for drawing away attention from the actual scum hunting and directing it to setup, and another FOS for wanting to draw out more roles.
I didn't get prodded... I prodded myself... felt surprisingly good, actually.Streaker wrote:Mudpuppy scummy vibe for instantly reacting when he get's prodded, but still no actual decent posts yet.
I just read through all of his posts, too. Is anyone able to sum up the case against him, or is it just that it's easier to try to nitpick the statements of an inexperienced player. (I know how that feels.) I saw that one of Storr's points against him was that he "blatantly wishes to follow", but has anyone noticed pershy's posts (easy to miss, since there are so few of them):Ragian wrote:I've walked through sempai's posts and I agree that he seems all over the place suggesting first that Stor would be town, then scum, then 3rd party, then something 4th (if possible). I also see him being caught up in some semantics. It just doesn't scream scum to me. Rather that makes him very engaged in the flavour trying to figure out reads based on that in my eyes. Mix that with his lack of mafia experience and you get a loose dog in a bowling alley (that might be a Danish expression, but you probably get the point). Anyway, I don't find his various attempts at figuring out what Stor was or his backtracking particularly scummy.
pershy wrote:Hmm maybe Mtam as Endgame says.
pershy wrote:I could get behind a Ragian vote....
These seem like the posts of a follower, but no one else seems interested in putting any pressure on him to contribute more. Not saying that either one of them is town/scum/whatever at this point, but I think it's still too early in the day to focus too hard on one person and let others off the hook.pershy wrote:Yup decent points by streaker. Also Storr is good at scum hunting and therefore is a valuable town player (when town of course).
Basically, this.Ragian wrote:I've walked through sempai's posts and I agree that he seems all over the place suggesting first that Stor would be town, then scum, then 3rd party, then something 4th (if possible). I also see him being caught up in some semantics. It just doesn't scream scum to me. Rather that makes him very engaged in the flavour trying to figure out reads based on that in my eyes. Mix that with his lack of mafia experience and you get a loose dog in a bowling alley (that might be a Danish expression, but you probably get the point). Anyway, I don't find his various attempts at figuring out what Stor was or his backtracking particularly scummy.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
And may I add that I do not recall saying that I "blatantly wish to follow" - to the point that I asked Storr where he had found that, and still haven't received an answer?degaston wrote:I saw that one of Storr's points against [sempai] was that he "blatantly wishes to follow", but has anyone noticed pershy's posts (easy to miss, since there are so few of them):pershy wrote:Hmm maybe Mtam as Endgame says.pershy wrote:I could get behind a Ragian vote....These seem like the posts of a follower, but no one else seems interested in putting any pressure on him to contribute more. Not saying that either one of them is town/scum/whatever at this point, but I think it's still too early in the day to focus too hard on one person and let others off the hook.pershy wrote:Yup decent points by streaker. Also Storr is good at scum hunting and therefore is a valuable town player (when town of course).
I suspect he was referring to this:sempaispellcheck wrote:And may I add that I do not recall saying that I "blatantly wish to follow" - to the point that I asked Storr where he had found that, and still haven't received an answer?
sempaispellcheck wrote: I kind of like the idea of following someone else's lead early on in the hope that the result will give us some information on that person as well (hence my mtam vote - looking to shed a little more light on Storr).
I don't plan on doing that the whole game, but on D1, it seemed like FOSing people might not get as much of a reaction. In Pershy's case, even voting for him hasn't gotten a reaction.Metsfanmax wrote:degaston: Some newb play. I was initially annoyed by the strategy of just voting random inactives but I think that it's a town tell and I think it helped spark some discussion in at least one case.
Deflection.sempaispellcheck wrote: Endgame was following me pretty closely for a while - as somebody noted a while back - and hasn't yet turned on me. For those of you who think I'm scummy, he's probably worth a look.
sempai
sempaispellcheck wrote:I'm not actively trying to defend Storr, for what that's worth - I'm just saying he could, potentially, maybe, be useful later on. That said, I can see (and have made) a few arguments for getting rid of him early. I've got an FOS on him, but that's as far as I think I'll go today.
I've never played with any of you, so I don't know your metas, and I don't really know how to read people yet, since this is only my third game (and I've been nightkilled early in every game I played.
I kind of like the idea of following someone else's lead early on in the hope that the result will give us some information on that person as well (hence my mtam vote - looking to shed a little more light on Storr).
Basically, I'm kind of jumping around because I don't know much of anything (it is D1), and I'm trying to get some type of foothold somewhere.
I also think I need to reread the thread a bit more closely and see what (if anything) I can figure out.
sempai

Did I miss it? Where did sempai claim VT?Endgame422 wrote:Deflection.sempaispellcheck wrote: Endgame was following me pretty closely for a while - as somebody noted a while back - and hasn't yet turned on me. For those of you who think I'm scummy, he's probably worth a look.
sempai
If your not scum why would my 2 votes you agreed with (mtam/dd) make me scum?
If you are scum, your just trying to build a case based on someone else's previously stated suspicions.
Your claiming VT so your a low risk lynch now anyways.
When you flip(either way) your list should prove useful.
VOTE SEMPAI
Yes - I missed it. I see it now.degaston wrote:Did I miss it? Where did sempai claim VT?Endgame422 wrote:Deflection.sempaispellcheck wrote: Endgame was following me pretty closely for a while - as somebody noted a while back - and hasn't yet turned on me. For those of you who think I'm scummy, he's probably worth a look.
sempai
If your not scum why would my 2 votes you agreed with (mtam/dd) make me scum?
If you are scum, your just trying to build a case based on someone else's previously stated suspicions.
Your claiming VT so your a low risk lynch now anyways.
When you flip(either way) your list should prove useful.
VOTE SEMPAI