Moderator: Community Team


Yes, but it has been reaffirmed every time that it has come up for serious discussion, up to the last time we seriously considered it (last year).nvrijn wrote:The rejection of "surrender" appears to have happened in 2006!!
There are ALREADY penalties that can be assessed for throwing games...InnyaFacce wrote:There has to be a penalty of some typedakky21 wrote:you just lose the game. everything stays the same.InnyaFacce wrote:what is the penalty for using this option ?
NO
the problem is this was discussed a lot of times before and it was always a no go...
Otherwise it is a bad idea
I can see it being used as a CHEAT if implemented

This or a % of overdrop in trench gamesdemonfork wrote:If there was a provision that would involve a certain threshold of ratios between army counts, then maybe the surrender button could be implemented with little risk of abuse.
Meaning, one couldn't surrender until their opponent had a 4 to 1 army ratio to their own army count. Or whatever ratio is deemed appropriate.
So if player A has 32 armies and player B has 8 armies then the system would allow player B to surrender.

doesn't matter... the one time the site had it, it was abused to the nth degree... every owner has stated there will not be a surrender button... this is not going to change... pick better settings... in before the MERGE, with the rest of the "whiner/surrender button" threads... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirconcrete wrote:If the majority of the members want one, then we can vote on what kind exactly we need.

"Conditionally" does not mean "yes", it means conditionally. There is a HUGE difference between the two, and that difference is actually why this hasn't been implemented.concrete wrote:yes...............24
no................ 4
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
doesn't matter owen, this isn't a thread to try to get a button, I pretty much know this wont happen, otherwise it would have been up and running for a while now, this is simply a thread to get a count of who would like to see a quit button of some kind implemented in this site. As I stated before, I don't think I have seen an actual count of this. All the threads I have ever seen on the subject has arguments over silly why and why nots. I simply wanted to put numbers to this subject so the whole site can see it.....useful piece of info to have if the owner wants to see it for some reason. And from what I have seen players like to be heard in some way.owenshooter wrote:doesn't matter... the one time the site had it, it was abused to the nth degree... every owner has stated there will not be a surrender button... this is not going to change... pick better settings... in before the MERGE, with the rest of the "whiner/surrender button" threads... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirconcrete wrote:If the majority of the members want one, then we can vote on what kind exactly we need.
And if you had read the intro to this thread, you would have seen all I am looking for is yes= some kind of button, if it has restrictions, that would be decided later because even if this little vote thread shows that the players want it, even if it finishes in 30 days with 500 yeses and 50 nos.....nothing will change.JamesKer1 wrote:"Conditionally" does not mean "yes", it means conditionally. There is a HUGE difference between the two, and that difference is actually why this hasn't been implemented.concrete wrote:yes...............24
no................ 4
These results are biased and therefore skewed. Just so you know.
