MTam is back. He asked for a summary.got tonkaed wrote:Mtam is literally out of the country on vacation, so I think it is a bit much to expect him to be like oh yeah, HP mafia, better post a ton in that thread.
[Official] HP Mafia - MVP: Aage - Archive
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
he is not back, he posted while on vacation.charm wrote:MTam is back. He asked for a summary.got tonkaed wrote:Mtam is literally out of the country on vacation, so I think it is a bit much to expect him to be like oh yeah, HP mafia, better post a ton in that thread.

Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Sorry, skimming a bit... I see that Strike was still pushing for a virus claim, which I'm also good with. I interpreted his upcoming case on tonkaed as his prime suspect.StorrZerg wrote:@mudpuppy why not virus
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
End, did you start the game wandless or were you disarmed? The VT claim is believable to link to that character, but the character would actually fit 3rd party more then town.
- Endgame422
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
- Location: Colorado
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Started wandless.Streaker wrote:End, did you start the game wandless or were you disarmed? The VT claim is believable to link to that character, but the character would actually fit 3rd party more then town.
- Endgame422
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
- Location: Colorado
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Are we going to pressure someone else today or just lynch me and call it a day?
I dont like the case on virus much and my lone vote on tal does not seem like much pressure to me.
I dont remember the case on HS honestly.
Id be okay with a push on dazza(did i mention that already?)
I dont like the case on virus much and my lone vote on tal does not seem like much pressure to me.
I dont remember the case on HS honestly.
Id be okay with a push on dazza(did i mention that already?)
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
So you think I am scum and voted Ragian as soon as he claimed? Surely if he was my scum buddy I would have believed the claim at least for a while. I get that it was a shit fake claim but I would not have voted so quickly if I was scum.
If you think I have posted nothing creative I probably never will. This is how I play. I vote for who I think is scummy. You also say I just sheep votes. In what way? I was one of the first to vote Pershy and Rage. I voted Endgame today because he was my top suspect. It seems like you read people saying it about the voting on Storr and Mtamb on day 1 and are still just using that shite.
fastposted
If you think I have posted nothing creative I probably never will. This is how I play. I vote for who I think is scummy. You also say I just sheep votes. In what way? I was one of the first to vote Pershy and Rage. I voted Endgame today because he was my top suspect. It seems like you read people saying it about the voting on Storr and Mtamb on day 1 and are still just using that shite.
fastposted

- Endgame422
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
- Location: Colorado
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Glad youve had a laugh at least dazz.
What do you think about the pushes on virus/talapus?
Any interest in either of them?
What do you think about the pushes on virus/talapus?
Any interest in either of them?
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
The first half of your post is just pure WIFOM. You still wanna lynch endgame today? Would you like to lynch him now, or pressure someone else? Who then?dazza2008 wrote:So you think I am scum and voted Ragian as soon as he claimed? Surely if he was my scum buddy I would have believed the claim at least for a while. I get that it was a shit fake claim but I would not have voted so quickly if I was scum.
If you think I have posted nothing creative I probably never will. This is how I play. I vote for who I think is scummy. You also say I just sheep votes. In what way? I was one of the first to vote Pershy and Rage. I voted Endgame today because he was my top suspect. It seems like you read people saying it about the voting on Storr and Mtamb on day 1 and are still just using that shite.
fastposted
End, what is your case on dazza? I think you'll vote for just about anyone now to escape a lynch.
----------
Now for the case on virus.
Storr starts off with this vote, and a reference to the notes. Tonka insta-wagons without contributing anything else.
StorrZerg wrote:This.got tonkaed wrote:It also doesnt hurt mitch that he is Ron who isn't going to get bothered much by the town.
I think we should explore the notes more. It's possible the person mentioned in the note had an interaction with the recipient.
vote virus90
That's quite a strange follow-up post to make.StorrZerg wrote:Honestly the push on virus regarding the note is purely role fishing. It's just a nice thing to know with a scum push
Mitch also blatant wagoning. I was too quick saying virus didn't post enough for me to read, but what mitch is posting surely does beat that.
HotShot also votes virus with a more elaborate post, but the actual case is weaksauce. What he writes about virus' actions is true, but don't hit me as that scummy.
The main case on virus comes from, big surprise, storr:
Main thing here is meta (how he can scumhunt when town in other games). I also like the remark on number of times he's voted. Sheeping is the other main issue. So meta and sheeping.StorrZerg wrote:I can link you many games with virus having fantastic scum hunting. The thing he lacks as a player is the ability to follow up with his suspects and convince others. (likely cause he posts rarely is a large factor) Given that, its quite strange how often he has voted. I think this is one of his more active voting games.
Order of his votes
Madmitch soft claiming ron in his first post (joke vote yes)
Strike Wolf (same post, joke on his name being wolf)
BGtheBrain His first real push. Weak push.
Sempai Sheeps on this vote (lightly defends rage in this post for not knowing flavor) Gives some reads in the post (him not seeing past mtambs stubbornish is odd, he knows better about tambs play. His vote on sempai, is a sheep from town reading streaker.
mtamburini THis vote is bad from virus. Because he is hunting a role, "are you vig" "is the shot limited" "is annoyed by mtambs threats" Yet how is this different from any other game...
mudpuppy I really dont understand his push on mudpuppy. its not even a case, just i'd like to vote him
ENd of day 1
Skillfullsniper Strangely this vote comes in pretty late into day 2. He has no other input since then, and had decided to not make a new case, and instead pick from one of the ones present, so he follows strike on skill.
End of day 2
NO vote day 3 or 4.
I like my case on talapus over virus simply because it has better points then meta in it. If virus is pushed it's over meta (and for good reason, because even when he posted that long ass post, it still contained nothing).
FP'd end
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
So with a claim from end, one that seems plausible and fortified by dobby being VT as well, i'm going back to my main lead today.
Unvote, vote Talapus
Unvote, vote Talapus
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Streaker your power last night would swap dd5 and whom ever you targeted last night?
or doe sit revert back to 0, having to target 2 consecutive people
or doe sit revert back to 0, having to target 2 consecutive people

Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
No it takes 2 nights again. I targeted hotshot last night, but it failed. I did not get confirmation that it was me that was blocked or something, or hotshot. I am trying again tonight.StorrZerg wrote:Streaker your power last night would swap dd5 and whom ever you targeted last night?
or doe sit revert back to 0, having to target 2 consecutive people
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Interesting that you would get notification that it failed.
Mtamb suggested that voldemort could not be hit by night actions till he himself died. Why are you not looking into pushing hotshot like a mad man today?
Mtamb suggested that voldemort could not be hit by night actions till he himself died. Why are you not looking into pushing hotshot like a mad man today?

Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
So while you defend virus more by attacking meta, could you throw in some content about virus himself? You still have refused to take a stance on his actions.

Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 19/24 - D3: In the Chamber of Secr
VOTE COUNT
Endgame - sempai, dd, Daz, Talapus, charm
virus - Storr, mitch, HotShot, Streaker
tonka - MudPuppy
Talapus - Endgame
With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
Endgame - sempai, dd, Daz, Talapus, charm
virus - Storr, mitch, HotShot, Streaker
tonka - MudPuppy
Talapus - Endgame
With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
I am not sure what mtamb exactly meant about the night actions.
Going flavour here, it would make most sense if this goes both ways.
I might have been blocked. He might have been blocked. I shall indulge storr tomorrow by posting what I like and dislike myself about him.
In the meantime, storr, feel free to pressure the players who refuse to step up and explain their votes.
How do you explain the contradiction you posted (my previous post) about the rolefishing?
Coming back to that claim from mtam regarding night actions, it was stated very unclear:
' I can never die in the night because if I do it makes Voldemort vulernarable to night actions'.
Cannot compute that sentence.
I make of this that mtamb cannot be nightkilled, until voldemort is dead.mtamburini wrote:Says the guy with admits to only playing one gamedegaston wrote:Unvote
Vote Pershy
WTF - Why would you start the game that way if you were HP?He wasn't forced to claim - you were.mtamburini wrote:Explain how your play has been better than mine.
Info I can bring to the town, I can never die in the night because if I do it makes Voldemort vulernarable to night actions (probably means night vigi shots) As long as Im alive Voldemort can only be lynched. Keep that in mind if there is another vigi whos shot does not go through it may not be because there was a medic save or a protection role and could just be voldemort you attacked.
Going flavour here, it would make most sense if this goes both ways.
I might have been blocked. He might have been blocked. I shall indulge storr tomorrow by posting what I like and dislike myself about him.
In the meantime, storr, feel free to pressure the players who refuse to step up and explain their votes.
How do you explain the contradiction you posted (my previous post) about the rolefishing?
Coming back to that claim from mtam regarding night actions, it was stated very unclear:
' I can never die in the night because if I do it makes Voldemort vulernarable to night actions'.
Cannot compute that sentence.
- got tonkaed
- Posts: 5034
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Detroit
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Just seems like a flavor way for the mod to make Harry Bulletproof.
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Difference between cannot and will not.
Mafia will not target tamb. Be broken as f*ck if only way to kill tambo is lynch.
Mafia will not target tamb. Be broken as f*ck if only way to kill tambo is lynch.

Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Him being blocked doesn't stop your power wtf are you spewing bs for. Jail maybe. But you did say that

- got tonkaed
- Posts: 5034
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Detroit
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Page 1 says the busdriver can get blocked.StorrZerg wrote:Him being blocked doesn't stop your power wtf are you spewing bs for. Jail maybe. But you did say that
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
I dont understand your contradiction in this post or the previous one.Streaker wrote:No it takes 2 nights again. I targeted hotshot last night, but it failed. I did not get confirmation that it was me that was blocked or something, or hotshot. I am trying again tonight.StorrZerg wrote:Streaker your power last night would swap dd5 and whom ever you targeted last night?
or doe sit revert back to 0, having to target 2 consecutive people
@tonked. He isn't bus driving this night, he claimed hotshot was possibly blocked preventing his action as a possibility

Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Go look at what I posted. You wanted to look into the notes, used it as your main reason in that post to vote virus.
Next post or second next says the push on virus regarding the note is pure rolefishing. so either you are contradicting yourself, or you are admitting to rolefishing.
Next post or second next says the push on virus regarding the note is pure rolefishing. so either you are contradicting yourself, or you are admitting to rolefishing.
- Endgame422
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
- Location: Colorado
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
Streaker if i were desperate to save myself i would be pushing virus. I dont see much of a case on him right now but he has the same amount of votes as i do atm so i think hes the easy target but not the best one.
My thoughts against dazza are his defense of pix makes zero sense to me. He says pix always plays like this and would rather be lynched than have us lynch pix. Thats some serious commitment over an essentially meta town read and it just does not add up to me.
I would not die for another player unless they were confirmed and more powerful than I was. Pix is not confirmed(we are taking him at his word) and is yet to save anyone as far as i can tell.
Case on tal is largely based on his attempt to find the real dumbledore and his softdefense of rage yesterday.
Probably the best case we have currently and i would rather get a claim from tal rather then a claim from virus.
My thoughts against dazza are his defense of pix makes zero sense to me. He says pix always plays like this and would rather be lynched than have us lynch pix. Thats some serious commitment over an essentially meta town read and it just does not add up to me.
I would not die for another player unless they were confirmed and more powerful than I was. Pix is not confirmed(we are taking him at his word) and is yet to save anyone as far as i can tell.
Case on tal is largely based on his attempt to find the real dumbledore and his softdefense of rage yesterday.
Probably the best case we have currently and i would rather get a claim from tal rather then a claim from virus.
Re: [Official] HP Mafia - 17/24 - D4: No more Mad-Eye
I'm not contradicting myself I made an observational comment regarding that reason.Streaker wrote:Go look at what I posted. You wanted to look into the notes, used it as your main reason in that post to vote virus.
Next post or second next says the push on virus regarding the note is pure rolefishing. so either you are contradicting yourself, or you are admitting to rolefishing.
I found virus scummy before the note. Their is information to be had with a virus claim in relation to the note. Pushing that only is role fishing.
You spat at me for defending end, yet town read him after the claim. Actually defend virus actions please instead of only talking about my accusation.
