Moderator: Community Team
There was no jokey voting phase, Mtam ended that one immediately.got tonkaed wrote:I don't really think wagoning in the jokey voting phase matters much anyway.
Precisely my point. I was getting you to answer the question clearly, but you are immediately leaping to defend yourself.got tonkaed wrote:It was to get you to shut up. You were trying to make something out of thin air. It did not work.
Yes, and it's also the easy way out. Notice how no one else was calling for it -- there was a reason, and it's not because we were all idiots. It is a bit of a scum indicator that you weren't trying very hard to think about what's going on.got tonkaed wrote:I had read it wrong the first time around, but I think its sensible to want to lynch the guy who is offering those type of things.

I cannot now say why, but I am basically certain that IB did not make it up.got tonkaed wrote:I guess my question is do you think that IB made up the person visiting him and the offer? If so why? If not, then why is trying to find that person lazy? Even if it is just the goal rather than something you have information immediately on.
Well if mets is hinting that someone visited him in the same manner, is it that odd to think we might have a tracker out there? It seems like a game where a tracker role would exist. Certainly there is a bit of luck involved. But the more people who come out and say they got an offer the more likely that tracker saw it.StorrZerg wrote:Trying to find thst person is useless because they won't claim it, additionally unless someone tracked watched the event, we can't know who...
So better to hunt scum, we might get lucky..

Talk about a leap and out of contextWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Place a vote on Talapus. I still dont think he has explained properly what was going on with his "no action" comment, did not attack Streaker
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!

Has it not passed?Talapus wrote:This deadline is fast approaching

