Moderator: Community Team
You really are new, here! Or.. maybe I am just really, really oldArmy of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are
And that is why, on the Internet, you are 12 (and I am 30)Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are
Does that make Al Gore ∞?InkL0sed wrote:And that is why, on the Internet, you are 12 (and I am 30)Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are
:[Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
suggs was cool, backglass was a douche.PLAYER57832 wrote:You really are new, here! Or.. maybe I am just really, really oldArmy of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are![]()
![]()
Anyway, they were good guys. (and yes, I do mean "guys" as in "male")
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Shit. I'm late.Haggis_McMutton wrote:I'm gonna respond to this post 3 years from now.Army of GOD wrote:I love when an old thread is bumped, and someone quotes and responds to people who said something years ago.
Also, this is vintage off-topics right here. Holy shit, almost forgot about backglass and suggs.
Better late than never. Good job, remembering a resolution for that long!Haggis_McMutton wrote:Shit. I'm late.Haggis_McMutton wrote:I'm gonna respond to this post 3 years from now.Army of GOD wrote:I love when an old thread is bumped, and someone quotes and responds to people who said something years ago.
Also, this is vintage off-topics right here. Holy shit, almost forgot about backglass and suggs.
Sorry AoG.
Agreed. Almost as impressive as the fact that we landed on the moon.Dukasaur wrote:Better late than never. Good job, remembering a resolution for that long!Haggis_McMutton wrote:Shit. I'm late.Haggis_McMutton wrote:I'm gonna respond to this post 3 years from now.Army of GOD wrote:I love when an old thread is bumped, and someone quotes and responds to people who said something years ago.
Also, this is vintage off-topics right here. Holy shit, almost forgot about backglass and suggs.
Sorry AoG.
You must be joking. You cannot prove a negative.ParadiceCity9 wrote:Well then prove there aren't any pictures.
While I agree with most of what you said...the moon has no atmosphere.PLAYER57832 wrote: They did, though they left a great deal more in orbit. Some of it entered the moon atmosphere and burned up.

Lol, sure.Phatscotty wrote:The moon landing was real.
The film and pictures were fake.
Phatscotty wrote:The moon landing was real.
The film and pictures were fake.

True enough. Still2dimes wrote:Necro bumping is very popular here and this was a terrific one because, Haggis has been absent yet came in near the anniversary of when he pre planned it. A+++
Pedronicus wrote:Very interesting that NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter can take a picture of the Phoenix Lander... It is 15 feet wide with the solar panels out.
AndyDufresne wrote:New image as seen from above by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The blue looking feature in the upper-center part of the picture is the Phoenix Lander...two the circular parts flanking the center mass are the deployed solar panels.
The two impact depressions located in the center of the image is where the heat shield, after being jettisoned, impacted and bounced.
And the parachute and attachment is located at the bottom of the image. --Andy
I know this an old topic, but here's the photos...
http://imgur.com/gyt2mUm
Stuff allegedly left on the moon after America landed on the moon (cough, cough)....
6 x Lunar landing modules
Dimensions
Height: 20.9 ft 6.37 m
Diameter: 14 ft 4.27 m
Landing gear span: 29.75 ft 9.07 m
Volume: 235 ft³ 6.65 m³
3 x Lunar Roving Vehicles (Moon Buggy) : The frame was 10 feet (3 m) long with a wheelbase of 7.5 feet (2.3 m).
No photos to date of these items, plus the flags, footprints and other stuff left behind.....
If America can photo the surface of Mars in a good enough quality to pick out a 15 foot wide lander, it can't hard to launch a high resolution satellite to orbit the moon and take some photos to prove the landings once and for all.
Cannot be bothered to read through the entire thread, but these photos do exist, as do multiple other forms of proof. You just have to search real science sites.Pedronicus wrote:
If America can photo the surface of Mars in a good enough quality to pick out a 15 foot wide lander, it can't hard to launch a high resolution satellite to orbit the moon and take some photos to prove the landings once and for all.