Moderator: Community Team
It wasn't ignoring the question. It was hopping on to take turns on my risk games after I missed a turn in a few of them after one of my dogs had to be put down yesterday.Ragian wrote:@LSU, is joke voting worse than skimming? Why did you switch from dakky to chuck?
From what I've seen Mitch tends to look scummy all the time in games. He lacks the polish needed to successfully argue why someone should or should not be considered scum and by doing so especially when it is an inaccurate "read" then finds himself under the gun. The way he seems to be quite hesitant to use past performances to state whether someone is a certain role makes me think that he may in fact be scum instead of town especially in light of the two old games that I have been reading he was in fact a plain townie.LSU if your backchecking games and argueing meta please tell me based off of mitchs "meta",
Can't you just accept the fact I'm not used to day starts before at least majority confirms?LSU Tiger Josh wrote: 2nd vote: Dakky got my joke vote because I just wanted to bust his chops a little bit for not realizing that the day had actually started with it listed in our subject heading as well as the scene being led.
Can't you just accept the fact that I stated multiple times now that it was a joke vote just to bust your chops over it. I'm not dwelling on it. Someone asked a question concerning it so I replied.dakky21 wrote:Can't you just accept the fact I'm not used to day starts before at least majority confirms?LSU Tiger Josh wrote: 2nd vote: Dakky got my joke vote because I just wanted to bust his chops a little bit for not realizing that the day had actually started with it listed in our subject heading as well as the scene being led.
And that I confirmed and then realized the day started with only few confirmations, not to say majority.
I skimmed through it because I expected just another confirmation over there and used "View the latest post" forum function.
Yeah, ok, so we're good. Don't mention that anymore, lol.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Can't you just accept the fact that I stated multiple times now that it was a joke vote just to bust your chops over it. I'm not dwelling on it. Someone asked a question concerning it so I replied.dakky21 wrote:Can't you just accept the fact I'm not used to day starts before at least majority confirms?LSU Tiger Josh wrote: 2nd vote: Dakky got my joke vote because I just wanted to bust his chops a little bit for not realizing that the day had actually started with it listed in our subject heading as well as the scene being led.
And that I confirmed and then realized the day started with only few confirmations, not to say majority.
I skimmed through it because I expected just another confirmation over there and used "View the latest post" forum function.
Not going to comment. You got 6 pages to read. Not 26.HotShot53 wrote:I got a prod from the mod... sorry I forgot I was in this game. At a quick glance, it looks like a normal day 1 so far... a lot of people I haven't played with before, so it's going to be even harder getting reads on them than normal on day 1. I will have to read in more detail later today to see if I can find anything that jumps out at me as worthy for a vote.
So it was a joke vote?LSU Tiger Josh wrote:2nd vote: Dakky got my joke vote because I just wanted to bust his chops a little bit for not realizing that the day had actually started with it listed in our subject heading as well as the scene being led.Ragian wrote:@LSU, is joke voting worse than skimming? Why did you switch from dakky to chuck?
When you posted it, I didn't see it as a joke vote because of the reason given. It feels like you're backtracking...LSU Tiger Josh wrote:unvote vote dakky for skimming

Sorry to disappoint with my Ragian read. I don't have a hard read on him, deal with it.Endgame422 wrote:I agree with epi about narrowing our options here,however i dont like his top list there,he even says himself he doesnt really like the sausage/chuck cases but lists them anyways?
Also his response on ragian seemed intentionally wishy-washy,like he was trying to cover his ass regardless of how rage flipped.
Id put epi on my top list along with sausage and dakky.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
There is no reason you couldn't have mentioned it and not voted. It was switching votes that apparently made you scummy not pointing out when people were absent. This reeks of trying to ingratiate yourself to mtamburini while trying to appear actively scumhunting.madmitch wrote:@ Mtam you caught that too ? I didn't mentioned it because in another game I mentioned it too many times about players not posting and made me look bad by switching my votes on those players . @ Tim, you sure wasn't a V.T. in the last game were you (joker)
madmitch wrote:@ LSU I take it you have played in a few games and you feel that you can tell a players style, well maybe you can, I am fairly new in this mafia game world and I am trying to improve my style so it will be harder for someone to read me. but for you a so called old timer ( when I played this game we used chalk and a piece of slate) to call omeone scum because of past games is scummy for me. VOTE LSU
Please provide one piece of evidence other than him "calling someone scummy because of a past game"madmitch wrote:@ Sausage, I reread and still find LSU scummy .
Dakky is dead on I think. Most of your posts have little or no substance. Perhaps thats why you had no problem with people posting just to postmadmitch wrote:what the f*ck Dakky just wondering, anyway you brought the subject updakky21 wrote:Are you trying to be funny or steer the communication away from the actual game?madmitch wrote:@ Is he moving to a different house or actually moving his house?
madmitch wrote:I also have no problem in that comment ,it is just the norm to joke vote and if someone does try something else they get the big FOS. Look at me I started out in one game not joke voting and saying something I guess against the norm and I was labeled scum right off.mtamburini wrote:I actually like him for saying that. Am I the only one?Whatsausage wrote:unvote vote mrbellybangbang for posting for the sake of postingMrBellyBangBang wrote:Just to not be the silent one I'd like to add that I find most of you's behviour very fishy, joke votes is the hallmark of a criminal!!
. He's offering LSU's early vote on Chuck up as a reason for voting LSU, but he voted LSU before LSU voted Chuck, so clearly this wasn't the reason he voted for LSU, and if that early vote is scummy, then his early vote is scummy too. The real reason Madmitch voted LSU was pretty shallow in my eyes, he didn't like that LSU said that Epi felt like town, and yet LSU wouldn't rule out Epi as scum due to his earlier games. I don't think that's lynch worthy.madmitch wrote:Nice post SAUSAGE , You are right first I didn't like the fast vote on Chuck, and I did not like the he is assuming that Chuck and myself are partners,
Streaker, how serious was this post?Streaker wrote:FOS dakky, there is no need to vote Tim for bad english skills. He will get himself lynched without that push anyway. Waste of time.
FOS Tim, no need to OMGUS vote dakky, he will get himself lynched without that push anyway. Waste of time.
LSU, what's up with the early wagon vote?
MrBelly's original post was obviously joking... I thought sausage was joking with his vote, but this post seems to imply he was a bit more serious with it... I would have to give sausage a FOS for this, making up a reason to vote and seemingly being serious about it.Whatsausage wrote:Obviously no one is going to claim to be scum investigative role straight away, but you're right, you're post is just as useful as others if not more so, it gives us a place to start looking, at youMrBellyBangBang wrote:Well MrBelly was joking himself of course, my double exclamation marks should be a hint, but since you guys don't know me it might be difficult toTimWoodbury wrote:it i intereting to note dose he find our actions so far scummy because we are going through the regular joke vote stage?? if its skummy to go through joke vote tage what dose MrBelly think we hould be doing right off to get conversaton going?
discern how and what I normally do. I don't think stating something so obvious that posting for the sake of posting is scummy, It's what we all do the first turn, we don't have any intel and it's too earlyI for two people to claim to be the same werewolf oracle or the same mafia seer, honsty is not scummy in my book.
See this says your reading him town. But you take the extra time to remind us all that you might be wrong,like your concerned that if he flips scum it might come back to you.Epitaph1 wrote:I think Rag is more likely town than not, but it's still very early. He's probably the best scum player in TNC, so be mindful of that.
Interesting how the next post from(above)says you dont have a hard read,if thats the case why did you say you thought he is more likely town? Why not just tell me that you didnt have a good read?Epitaph1 wrote:Sorry to disappoint with my Ragian read. I don't have a hard read on him, deal with it.
Rage in response to this post,i think epi is exactly the kind of player who is confident and experienced enough to try and lead as scum. Think about mets in CYOM,he lead town all the way to Lylo in a similar fashion.Ragian wrote:@endgame, drawing on experience I can't tell you flat out if epi is town or non-town at this moment, but I would say that he seems more progressive (his thoughts on LSU) than he usually does when antitown and has more to lose. I'm leaning town for that reason.
The thing is I'm trying to figure out in my head, however, is if non-town in a game with two non-town factions might be better off acting progressively...
I'm leaning town on epi. I can't recall seeing him this pushy when scum before.
This list isnt bad, what do you think about belly/hotshot read on me?TimWoodbury wrote:okay so after reading through im looking dakky as town and im also thinking that sausage is skummy, since people are asking top 3 to narrow down lynch possabilitys
1-sausage
2-streak
3-chuck
nothing really more then a gut feeling im liking dakky because he seems like his typical self not doing anything differant that im seeing,
Did you just claim you were not town? Far as I know nobody said you were a pseudo -confirmed town. He said he had 1 scum out of 4 and a pseudo-confirmed town , no names mentioned and you automatically say it you .UNVOTE VOTE SAUSAGEWhatsausage wrote:I just don't want to be friendsmtamburini wrote:@Whatsauasge what issue do you have with me posting that?
The fact that I failed, you didnt like the gif, or you just dont want to be friends?![]()
Why would you say I am pseudo-confirmed town after I have only posted once? (non confirm post)
madmitch wrote:Did you just claim you were not town? Far as I know nobody said you were a pseudo -confirmed town. He said he had 1 scum out of 4 and a pseudo-confirmed town , no names mentioned and you automatically say it you .UNVOTE VOTE SAUSAGEWhatsausage wrote:I just don't want to be friendsmtamburini wrote:@Whatsauasge what issue do you have with me posting that?
The fact that I failed, you didnt like the gif, or you just dont want to be friends?![]()
Why would you say I am pseudo-confirmed town after I have only posted once? (non confirm post)
if im reading hotshots read on you correct he say he reads you town based off being typicall arrogant skumhunter(so basically hes reading you town off town meata)mtamburini wrote:what do you think about belly/hotshot read on me?
mitch is panicking and throwing shit against the wall, hoping that something will stickTimWoodbury wrote:madmitch wrote:Did you just claim you were not town? Far as I know nobody said you were a pseudo -confirmed town. He said he had 1 scum out of 4 and a pseudo-confirmed town , no names mentioned and you automatically say it you .UNVOTE VOTE SAUSAGEWhatsausage wrote:I just don't want to be friendsmtamburini wrote:@Whatsauasge what issue do you have with me posting that?
The fact that I failed, you didnt like the gif, or you just dont want to be friends?![]()
Why would you say I am pseudo-confirmed town after I have only posted once? (non confirm post)
im not quite sure what exactly your seeing could just be my reading of that quote but i can deffinatly agree how can he let alone ANYONE have any type of even semi confirmed town read on anyone like he said he had.