Secret Diplomacy between SneakySheep and copacetik

[mosul]

I want to report a Secret Diplomacy between SneakySheep and copacetik in Game 16178052 (game with fog of war).


Accused:

SneakySheep
copacetik


The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Possible Being Multis


Game number(s):

Game 16178052


Comments:

You can see from game chat that SneakySheep know in the thirteenth round that I'm also under attack from other direction by copacetik but he can't see that.

With respect,

Cristian

[mosul]

Print screen with the map

[MagnusGreeol]

- The game log does show Red attacking you, All he has to do is look at the log to know who's attacking you. Now if He mentioned your troop count but can't see you thats different, Or if you saw a message on Reds wall that would also be taken into account. You tell me, is it possible he viewed the log and knows your under attack from other side?

-\MGM/-

[copacetik]

Although I believe MagnusGreeol summed it up accurately I would like to respond since I am being accused in this post.

Regarding being multis I am sure the admins can easily see that is not the case. I would also point out of my 2163 games completed (at moment of this writing), 7 have been with SneakySheep.

Regarding secret diplomacy, I categorically deny ever conducting secret diplomacy in any game on CC. As MagnusGreeol points out the game log clearly shows I had taken a territory from mosul prior to SneakySheep's comment. As I mentioned in the game it was easy for him to deduce that I intended to attack mosul, which was in fact the case.

copacetik

[MagnusGreeol]

Although I believe MagnusGreeol summed it up accurately I would like to respond since I am being accused in this post.

Regarding being multis I am sure the admins can easily see that is not the case. I would also point out of my 2163 games completed (at moment of this writing), 7 have been with SneakySheep.

Regarding secret diplomacy, I categorically deny ever conducting secret diplomacy in any game on CC. As MagnusGreeol points out the game log clearly shows I had taken a territory from mosul prior to SneakySheep's comment. As I mentioned in the game it was easy for him to deduce that I intended to attack mosul, which was in fact the case.

copacetik

- The log actually shows twice an attack was made before all this, This is clearly an open shut case of not understanding that the game log ( For people who can read it and figure out an underlined story), and how it works. This may even be a lesson learned for Mosul? And I'm not shitting on you Mosul, I'm just sàying you will be a better player overall if you pay attention to the log in wars you can't see (Fog). GL to All! ")

-\MGM/-

[riskllama]

game log = bible
learn it, know it, live it.

[mosul]

I learned now and I will pay more attention to game log. I withdraw accusations. Good luck all.

[riskllama]

attaboy, mosul...

[MagnusGreeol]

- Nice Mosul! GL Bro! ")

[Lord Arioch]

Kudos Earned!

[sniffie]

Cleared

[SneakySheep]

bahaha just read this... sorry but it cracks me up... a simple game log shows you were attacked by red for a few rounds the fact that you asked for an alliance showed you were under pressure i'd be a fool not to try and get more land...

[sniffie]

bahaha just read this... sorry but it cracks me up... a simple game log shows you were attacked by red for a few rounds the fact that you asked for an alliance showed you were under pressure i'd be a fool not to try and get more land...

As you can also read, the accuser has redrawn his accusations and has said sorry. Shall we let this behind us?

sniff