Moderator: Community Team

This and the fact that no suggestions get implemented even if they have support. Sorry for the let down, but alas, it's the state of the site at the moment.iAmCaffeine wrote:Suggestions would be more suitable but I'm not sure you'll get much support. It's general consensus on the forums that the rating system is rubbish and people have suggested new tags many times, with no result. If you add cumguzzler to the list, I'll support you.
Where do you think trench came from?Butters1919 wrote:This and the fact that no suggestions get implemented even if they have support. Sorry for the let down, but alas, it's the state of the site at the moment.iAmCaffeine wrote:Suggestions would be more suitable but I'm not sure you'll get much support. It's general consensus on the forums that the rating system is rubbish and people have suggested new tags many times, with no result. If you add cumguzzler to the list, I'll support you.

Sorry, should have said "Suggestions NO LONGER get implemented.".iAmCaffeine wrote:Where do you think trench came from?

There are still updates that occur. There was a number of them recently done called... Guaranteed suggestion implementation or something?Butters1919 wrote:Sorry, should have said "Suggestions NO LONGER get implemented.".iAmCaffeine wrote:Where do you think trench came from?


Well the features panel or whatever had a quick death, but the guaranteed implementation did have numerous suggestions implimented before trying to morph into whatever they were trying to do with the new team.

Agreed. A monthly post would do wonders. I know, I know, he hated the criticism and complaints that came after his announcements. He does not have to address those. Just make a monthly (or bi-weekly) announcement of what's going on behind and in front of the scenes and don't sign on to the forums until the next post. Let us rejoice/bitch/complain on our own. I dunno if that's the best idea either, but it's better than nothing. Who would have thought I'd long for the El Jefe days!Swifte wrote:I mean, the dude's only posted publicly twice in 2016. Of course we don't know what he's doing.

Well, my comment was directed towards the team leader, not the general public. But yeah, same sentiment stands from my perspective. Communication can easily be improved.Swifte wrote:I mean, the dude's only posted publicly twice in 2016. Of course we don't know what he's doing.



I agree on communication.iAmCaffeine wrote:Communication is basically the most important thing for Conquer Club in every single aspect. If it lacks, we suffer. It does seem there are many suggestions that garnered a lot of support and never saw fruition: new ranks comes to mind. This isn't criticism, but rather how can we address this?

Sorry mate, but with due respect I cannot believe you are encouraging someone to post a suggestion.IcePack wrote:I agree on communication.iAmCaffeine wrote:Communication is basically the most important thing for Conquer Club in every single aspect. If it lacks, we suffer. It does seem there are many suggestions that garnered a lot of support and never saw fruition: new ranks comes to mind. This isn't criticism, but rather how can we address this?
What I would suggest is usually the following:
1) make sure whatever it is really does have broad support. stuff like "resign button" might have a million posts in support, but because its strongly contested etc it really doesn't have much chance (from my view point, anyway).
2) make sure the OP both explains the purpose and what exactly they want changed, and the new suggestion / update to be. Being very vague (and letting BW "decide" stuff) or having the OP suggest one thing, but the new and improved suggestion be changed and buried 50 pages into it doesn't help anyone. if it was strongly opposed in one version and a future version is heralded as a broadly supported initiative, try to get the OP updated.
3) there are still some people (tho not many) active on the suggestions / features team. if you need help with #2, i would contact them.
4) have someone consolidate the widely supported ones in some kind of post. like a "here are ones that can be implimented" thread. one thing that was good about guarenteed suggestions program, was that it identified ones that were "too difficult" or whatever to get implimented and highlighted ones that were supported and could get implimented.
5) try to be neutral / keep your personal opinion out of it. while there are things we all love and wish to see implimented, dont stick something on the list that you support, that either doesn't have much outside support or is obviously such a big update that it probably wont happen etc.
6) Try to find things that have impacts to a large community of players, or have a very specific / small update that affects one specific area of the community greatly. those are likely the biggest ones to get sent to the front of the line (unless you have something that would help keep new recruits / benefit them, because thats the main priority for awhile now).
Thats what I try to do, and manage expectaitons. Stuff is still getting updated, but there are stuff already on the agenda / in the plans so even if its "the perfect suggestion" its going to get put on the schedule to be done, not usually rushed to the front of the line and immediately implimented.
We all use them?sergioms1 wrote:or red light district dad...
but, hey seriously....we all use them.


Moved it for you.sergioms1 wrote:Hey, How do I add or move this post to Suggestions?
Anyone?
on average, 1 to 2 suggs get implemented per year. as of now, there isn't a mod assigned to this forum, so that process is even slower. there are suggs that have been in the process of being implemented for YEARS now... so, in the scope of all things to be completed here on CC, i wouldn't count on this being implemented. good luck with the process... the black jesus has been honest...-Bjsergioms1 wrote:What's the latest on this.
Who is the person in charge?
I
