Metsfanmax wrote:madmitch wrote:Well something happened

, because the person I picked is still alive, and no I am not telling who.
I find it interesting that aage and new guy haven't acknowledged this post, and are still basically making the same case as before. mitch, are you claiming that you designated someone to be killed? You have basically already softclaimed this, please be explicit about it so that we can judge greg appropriately.
I mean, he already lied about being blocked, I know that he's scum. I don't really need to build a case on mitch2.0, if there's no one that is completely confirmed Light tomorrow, he will most likely be getting lynched. He lied, LAL, but I find greg to be just as good of a candidate in our circumstances. Per rules, 10 days (I think, may be upwards of 14) is the normal day limit. We are past deadline and greg has a large group on him. While we may be able to get the people over on to mitch before the day ended, I'm not trying to split our votes and kill a possible dark player (namely wing, he has a sizable amount of votes on him) just to switch off of someone I personally am convinced is scum (greg hasn't come in to clear any of this up, he's keeping his head down) just to land on another person I know is scum. Besides, I have already stated that I'm not knowledgeable as to if I even have a vote today, so I haven't made a big deal of switching it. If I saw more people on Mitch, then I would consider helping add momentum (you know, if I have a vote), if only to make sure that scum got lynched (so I would stay on greg as long as mitch was below anyone that I haven't confirmed to myself as scum) if they are indeed scum and weren't switched around and messed with again. My NA is the only thing I have to confirm what I think atm, and nobody has come in to say that we're making a mistake and that they switched something around. They are scum, or someone messed with the actions and isn't fixing it in a possible LYLO situation (I don't know that there is one, but Tim has at least put the idea in my head, obviously taken with a grain of salt).
I have already stated why I am still on greg in previous posts, and have already expressed an interest in Mitch. I believe both of them are lying. Should I really have come on to post about one more piece of evidence which incriminated the latter (which is already scum in my book)? I'm with aage on this one, the fact that there are so many people trying to switch to Mitch, Tim trying to switch it to himself, that just makes me think even more that there's someone important that is at risk of being lynched.
@Mitch, if you can't tell us who you targeted or why you targeted them, then how are we supposed to trust you? There are other ways you could have been blocked, but not by anyone visiting you. Nobody did. You're not helping yourself in the event that you somehow are town, because we can't determine if you're vig or mafia with that NK of yours if we don't know your motives.