Final answer?Anarkistsdream wrote:But, does that mean that there are only five types? That was not directly written in my PM...
Moderator: Community Team
Final answer?Anarkistsdream wrote:But, does that mean that there are only five types? That was not directly written in my PM...
madmitch wrote:unvote vote Dakky
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Then dance, for you hide amongst us no moreAnarkistsdream wrote:
And, yes, Wing... Final answer.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Then dance, for you hide amongst us no moreAnarkistsdream wrote:
And, yes, Wing... Final answer.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I'm not trying to be annoying but I feel like you just did directly below say you were only told what you were..Anarkistsdream wrote:
I never said I was not told ANYTHING. I said I didn't know how many other types of Pokemon there were..
Anarkistsdream wrote: I was never told the types of pokemon... Only what I was...

I should have been more clear... *shrug* But I am not going to spend the next three pages defending myself... I feel that I have proven myself to be a productive member of this game... If all of you want to bandwagon me, at least pay attention to who says what so you can try and take out TR afterward. This Day has gone on far too long, as is.nagerous wrote:I'm not trying to be annoying but I feel like you just did directly below say you were only told what you were..Anarkistsdream wrote:
I never said I was not told ANYTHING. I said I didn't know how many other types of Pokemon there were..
Anarkistsdream wrote: I was never told the types of pokemon... Only what I was...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
This is what you said in your original comment:The1exile wrote:I'm an idiot. I see what you mean now. I still don't see why it precludes you cl;aiming another pokemon of the listed types, however.
I was jumping on the part that said "preferably without type advantage" (bolding added by me).The1exile wrote:but it should be trivial to invent a pokemon name of an alternative, preferably without type advantage, so I'm not sure it holds up completely. Maybe we will get word of mod though.
This was the prevailing theory before Dakky's claim here:The1exile wrote:Also, if trainers already have a pokemon (the prevailing theory I believe) then they presumably already have this info, although i suppose maybe they can't talk yet.
Now, the likely case is that trainers did not already have a pokemon in their role PM. They had to choose one from a list during night 0 as their starter. Which brings me to my next very important point: There will be no viable false claims in this game. Since the trainers got to choose from a list of wild pokemon, they know exactly which wild pokemon are in this game. If you false claim, you will either get counter claimed or a trainer will know you're lying.dakky21 wrote:Actually, I was claimed before D1 officially started, during the confirm phase. I already confirmed and then was notified of a plot twist. My trainer had to choose one Pokemon from the list while not knowing who is playing behind it. That's how I got chosen, I guess it could have been any of the other wild ones. And I'm pretty sure there other trainers and other claimed pokemons just not wanting to reveal that fact.
"Anything" was hyperbole. You made it clear that you didn't know how a lot of info that the rest of us do and you just confirmed that you don't know how many types of wild Pokemon there are.Anarkistsdream wrote:I never said I was not told ANYTHING. I said I didn't know how many other types of Pokemon there were... I know what I am strong and weak against... I know I am weak against two and strong against two types... But, does that mean that there are only five types? That was not directly written in my PM...kwanton wrote:Then we have Nark who said he wasn't told anything. My original assumption was that ALL players would have been told the number of types of wild pokemon since that is such a central mechanic to the game. But it seems like that is not the case.
My guess: Nark and Exile are trainers of unknown alignment.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Like I said tho, a wild Pokemon should know exactly how many types there are. From the way others have posted, I think its clear to them too.Anarkistsdream wrote:*Appropriating my best southern belle accent*
Why, Kwanton, you old so-and-so, you KNOW I am just going to keep saying the same thing...
A wild Pokemon. Just like everyone else.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Yes. In fact my very first game, I was a vig who killed off all the town's power roles (not on purpose I swear). I got recruited by a cult on the final day and won with them because I had thinned out town enough with my miss-kills that my recruitment gave the cult the majority. WC changes when recruited.BuJaber wrote: Now I want to ask a question from those who have played a lot more mafia than I have: Have you played a game before where someone's wincon involved one faction getting eliminated but then they get recruited and their wincon becomes the exact opposite? If the answer is no, do you reckon Mandy has made that possible anyway?
BuJaber wrote:The Weird One - Be careful with big posts that have quotes within quotes as it is easy to type within the quote. This time I caught it because it was my own post you quoted. As for my vote on skittles... I understand that this is based on gen 1 and I also understand that team rocket were the villains in gen 1. I am not saying that team rocket are a charity organization.. all I'm saying is that we cannot know for certain that mandy followed conventions and based this game exactly on the anime/games. It is too dangerous, especially in a game this size where we're bound to mislynch a few times, to jump to conclusions about faction as early as day 1. In the wheel of time game that just ended 4 townies died before everyone was fully convinced that our original assumptions were wrong. Only someone who is scum would know for sure that they were scum. So if they are in fact team rocket, it makes sense to talk about how bad team rocket are in order to earn town cred. And yes, I am also jumping to a conclusion about skittles, but certainly at the time of voting I felt that it was at least on par with the other top lynch cases if not better, since day 1 typically involves quite a bit of guessing.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Nark, I hadn't voted you yet because I was giving you the benefit of the doubt so you could defend yourself, but seeing as you aren't doing that the only option you're giving us is to lynch and see how you flip. And even more, it sounds like you'd prefer that.Anarkistsdream wrote:You know... I was thinking about how rarely I make it to endgame... But if each day is going to be 30+ pages, maybe that isn't such a bad thing...MANDALORIAN!!!
That's actually a good point. Let's not let our initial assumptions limit our thinking. "If you immediately know the candlelight is fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago" and all that. It made me reread Mandy's start of Day 1 post. He said:strike wolf wrote:BuJaber wrote:The Weird One - Be careful with big posts that have quotes within quotes as it is easy to type within the quote. This time I caught it because it was my own post you quoted. As for my vote on skittles... I understand that this is based on gen 1 and I also understand that team rocket were the villains in gen 1. I am not saying that team rocket are a charity organization.. all I'm saying is that we cannot know for certain that mandy followed conventions and based this game exactly on the anime/games. It is too dangerous, especially in a game this size where we're bound to mislynch a few times, to jump to conclusions about faction as early as day 1. In the wheel of time game that just ended 4 townies died before everyone was fully convinced that our original assumptions were wrong. Only someone who is scum would know for sure that they were scum. So if they are in fact team rocket, it makes sense to talk about how bad team rocket are in order to earn town cred. And yes, I am also jumping to a conclusion about skittles, but certainly at the time of voting I felt that it was at least on par with the other top lynch cases if not better, since day 1 typically involves quite a bit of guessing.
Assailant. Singular. This could be meaningful or it could be nothing. Like I said, Mandy does like his flavor text. Just something to keep in the back of our minds.mandalorian2298 wrote:As you know, there has been some rumors about this year's Indigo League being canceled, due to so many pokemon trainers having been horribly murdered by an unknown assailant.
Metsfanmax wrote:The thing that holds me back from voting Nark is, why would he confess to ignorance on this if he's scum? Wouldn't it be better just to stay silent? It doesn't scan.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
In that case, please confirm with Mandy that your PM is correct. What you are saying and the information I have in my PM conflict. There is no reason for wild pokemon to have a difference in the mechanics section of their PMs. The only options are you are being untruthful, you read the PM wrong, or Mandy did not send you the full PM.Anarkistsdream wrote:I can't help what was in my PM,
What difference in mechanics is there? Two types you are weak against and two types you are strong against, plus your own type... The fact that it did not say there were ONLY five types of pokemon seems to be the only thing you are grasping at... And that isn't mechanics...kwanton wrote:In that case, please confirm with Mandy that your PM is correct. What you are saying and the information I have in my PM conflict. There is no reason for wild pokemon to have a difference in the mechanics section of their PMs. The only options are you are being untruthful, you read the PM wrong, or Mandy did not send you the full PM.Anarkistsdream wrote:I can't help what was in my PM,
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Yes the fact that it said there are five types of pokemon is the point of this whole argument. It does say that and others have understood their PMs to mean that too. Mandy's PM made it clear to us that there are only 5 types of wild pokemon.Anarkistsdream wrote:What difference in mechanics is there? Two types you are weak against and two types you are strong against, plus your own type... The fact that it did not say there were ONLY five types of pokemon seems to be the only thing you are grasping at... And that isn't mechanics...kwanton wrote:In that case, please confirm with Mandy that your PM is correct. What you are saying and the information I have in my PM conflict. There is no reason for wild pokemon to have a difference in the mechanics section of their PMs. The only options are you are being untruthful, you read the PM wrong, or Mandy did not send you the full PM.Anarkistsdream wrote:I can't help what was in my PM,
It literally says 'there are four more types of Pokemon in the Kanto region'.Anarkistsdream wrote:What difference in mechanics is there? Two types you are weak against and two types you are strong against, plus your own type... The fact that it did not say there were ONLY five types of pokemon seems to be the only thing you are grasping at... And that isn't mechanics...kwanton wrote:In that case, please confirm with Mandy that your PM is correct. What you are saying and the information I have in my PM conflict. There is no reason for wild pokemon to have a difference in the mechanics section of their PMs. The only options are you are being untruthful, you read the PM wrong, or Mandy did not send you the full PM.Anarkistsdream wrote:I can't help what was in my PM,
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "