Moderator: Community Team
So to actually respond to your post: If Kaskavel finds your play better than expected from a new player, he gets suspicious. That's nothing personal, it's just an alarm bell that starts ringing saying "hey, this player might not be new after all". Hive is a difficult map, playing a near-perfect turn as new player on such a chaotic map by accident is tough, that caused the alarm bell to ring. "Good enough to be mistaken for a multi" is hard to define. I've filed tickets for some players because I thought they were too good for their experience, but it differs per player. In my case, I wanted to play some more with these players but wanted to make sure they weren't multis before I invited them. In Kaskavel's case, it's likely he wants a fair game. He loses a lot of points versus a lower ranked player, and if that lower ranked player is actually way better it's unfair to him.CommKnight wrote:So I happened across the Cheating & Abuse forum and found one filled out about me.
This one.
This was shortly after reading a comment on my wall left by b00060 accusing me of being a multi account and blocking me. (Wonder if it has anything to do with mine and his games in tournament at the moment).
I mean I'm competitive in real life at this game but am new to this site. Am I really good enough to be mistaken for a multi account? I was on a winning streak in my first games but lately the dice have been killing me (or perhaps my strategy isn't as effective as I thought).
I'm just wondering if I'm actually that good so far? I mean I'll take the accusations as a compliment any day of the week. But curious as to what the general public thinks.
I'm curious, given your statement that you file tickets against people who you find to be better than you predicted them to be. Filing reports and opening tickets on people could be seen as a way of filtering out people who play beyond your expectations. Could you consider your behaviour to be a type of bullying?Extreme Ways wrote:So to actually respond to your post: If Kaskavel finds your play better than expected from a new player, he gets suspicious. That's nothing personal, it's just an alarm bell that starts ringing saying "hey, this player might not be new after all". Hive is a difficult map, playing a near-perfect turn as new player on such a chaotic map by accident is tough, that caused the alarm bell to ring. "Good enough to be mistaken for a multi" is hard to define. I've filed tickets for some players because I thought they were too good for their experience, but it differs per player. In my case, I wanted to play some more with these players but wanted to make sure they weren't multis before I invited them. In Kaskavel's case, it's likely he wants a fair game. He loses a lot of points versus a lower ranked player, and if that lower ranked player is actually way better it's unfair to him.CommKnight wrote:So I happened across the Cheating & Abuse forum and found one filled out about me.
This one.
This was shortly after reading a comment on my wall left by b00060 accusing me of being a multi account and blocking me. (Wonder if it has anything to do with mine and his games in tournament at the moment).
I mean I'm competitive in real life at this game but am new to this site. Am I really good enough to be mistaken for a multi account? I was on a winning streak in my first games but lately the dice have been killing me (or perhaps my strategy isn't as effective as I thought).
I'm just wondering if I'm actually that good so far? I mean I'll take the accusations as a compliment any day of the week. But curious as to what the general public thinks.
Filing an e-ticket on a lower ranked player just because you don't like the way they've played a game? That seems like you might be bullying lower ranked players, just because you have the benefit of experience.Extreme Ways wrote:So to actually respond to your post: If Kaskavel finds your play better than expected from a new player, he gets suspicious. That's nothing personal, it's just an alarm bell that starts ringing saying "hey, this player might not be new after all". Hive is a difficult map, playing a near-perfect turn as new player on such a chaotic map by accident is tough, that caused the alarm bell to ring. "Good enough to be mistaken for a multi" is hard to define. I've filed tickets for some players because I thought they were too good for their experience, but it differs per player. In my case, I wanted to play some more with these players but wanted to make sure they weren't multis before I invited them. In Kaskavel's case, it's likely he wants a fair game. He loses a lot of points versus a lower ranked player, and if that lower ranked player is actually way better it's unfair to him.CommKnight wrote:So I happened across the Cheating & Abuse forum and found one filled out about me.
This one.
This was shortly after reading a comment on my wall left by b00060 accusing me of being a multi account and blocking me. (Wonder if it has anything to do with mine and his games in tournament at the moment).
I mean I'm competitive in real life at this game but am new to this site. Am I really good enough to be mistaken for a multi account? I was on a winning streak in my first games but lately the dice have been killing me (or perhaps my strategy isn't as effective as I thought).
I'm just wondering if I'm actually that good so far? I mean I'll take the accusations as a compliment any day of the week. But curious as to what the general public thinks.
I have filed 1, maybe 2. I dont often play with lower ranked players because of my clan play, and even then they have to play way better than expected. This is also easier in 1v1 than in the games I'll play. Nymeria Stark was one of those I had silently, I was wrong. Why am I bullying him if I do it behind the scenes? I dont perceive it was you bullying me if you accuse me of being a multi, why should I be offended? Seems like a trollpost to me.Symmetry wrote:Filing an e-ticket on a lower ranked player just because you don't like the way they've played a game? That seems like you might be bullying lower ranked players, just because you have the benefit of experience.Extreme Ways wrote:So to actually respond to your post: If Kaskavel finds your play better than expected from a new player, he gets suspicious. That's nothing personal, it's just an alarm bell that starts ringing saying "hey, this player might not be new after all". Hive is a difficult map, playing a near-perfect turn as new player on such a chaotic map by accident is tough, that caused the alarm bell to ring. "Good enough to be mistaken for a multi" is hard to define. I've filed tickets for some players because I thought they were too good for their experience, but it differs per player. In my case, I wanted to play some more with these players but wanted to make sure they weren't multis before I invited them. In Kaskavel's case, it's likely he wants a fair game. He loses a lot of points versus a lower ranked player, and if that lower ranked player is actually way better it's unfair to him.CommKnight wrote:So I happened across the Cheating & Abuse forum and found one filled out about me.
This one.
This was shortly after reading a comment on my wall left by b00060 accusing me of being a multi account and blocking me. (Wonder if it has anything to do with mine and his games in tournament at the moment).
I mean I'm competitive in real life at this game but am new to this site. Am I really good enough to be mistaken for a multi account? I was on a winning streak in my first games but lately the dice have been killing me (or perhaps my strategy isn't as effective as I thought).
I'm just wondering if I'm actually that good so far? I mean I'll take the accusations as a compliment any day of the week. But curious as to what the general public thinks.
How often are you right with your e-tickets?
Yes he can.CommKnight wrote:But can B000 really ban me from tournaments just because he's being beaten fair and square? Not my fault my strategy seems to be winning against him on the maps we're currently playing.
yes, we all know how well that goes... *cough* Colton24 *cough*... i still don't think new players should be allowed to host tournaments or be given huge site responsibilities that they can just walk away from without any repercussions, *cough* Colton24 *cough*... the black jesus has spoken..-Jésus noirDukasaur wrote:New players are allowed to host tournaments. It's probably a good idea to play in a few tournaments before you host your first, but there's no rule that says you have to.
<spoken wearing my tournament director hat>

it seems like a troll post because it IS a troll post - fuckin' clown doesn't even play, just trolls. that's it.Extreme Ways wrote:I have filed 1, maybe 2. I dont often play with lower ranked players because of my clan play, and even then they have to play way better than expected. This is also easier in 1v1 than in the games I'll play. Nymeria Stark was one of those I had silently, I was wrong. Why am I bullying him if I do it behind the scenes? I dont perceive it was you bullying me if you accuse me of being a multi, why should I be offended? Seems like a trollpost to me.Symmetry wrote:Filing an e-ticket on a lower ranked player just because you don't like the way they've played a game? That seems like you might be bullying lower ranked players, just because you have the benefit of experience.Extreme Ways wrote:So to actually respond to your post: If Kaskavel finds your play better than expected from a new player, he gets suspicious. That's nothing personal, it's just an alarm bell that starts ringing saying "hey, this player might not be new after all". Hive is a difficult map, playing a near-perfect turn as new player on such a chaotic map by accident is tough, that caused the alarm bell to ring. "Good enough to be mistaken for a multi" is hard to define. I've filed tickets for some players because I thought they were too good for their experience, but it differs per player. In my case, I wanted to play some more with these players but wanted to make sure they weren't multis before I invited them. In Kaskavel's case, it's likely he wants a fair game. He loses a lot of points versus a lower ranked player, and if that lower ranked player is actually way better it's unfair to him.CommKnight wrote:So I happened across the Cheating & Abuse forum and found one filled out about me.
This one.
This was shortly after reading a comment on my wall left by b00060 accusing me of being a multi account and blocking me. (Wonder if it has anything to do with mine and his games in tournament at the moment).
I mean I'm competitive in real life at this game but am new to this site. Am I really good enough to be mistaken for a multi account? I was on a winning streak in my first games but lately the dice have been killing me (or perhaps my strategy isn't as effective as I thought).
I'm just wondering if I'm actually that good so far? I mean I'll take the accusations as a compliment any day of the week. But curious as to what the general public thinks.
How often are you right with your e-tickets?

Sometimes we get burned by new players abandoning stuff. Other time we get burned by 5-year veterans abandoning stuff. Experience brings no guarantee of reliability. Some of the best and most experienced TOs have walked away from stuff without warning. Sometimes people's circumstances change and they realize that they bit off more than they could chew.owenshooter wrote:yes, we all know how well that goes... *cough* Colton24 *cough*... i still don't think new players should be allowed to host tournaments or be given huge site responsibilities that they can just walk away from without any repercussions, *cough* Colton24 *cough*... the black jesus has spoken..-Jésus noirDukasaur wrote:New players are allowed to host tournaments. It's probably a good idea to play in a few tournaments before you host your first, but there's no rule that says you have to.
<spoken wearing my tournament director hat>
<spoken wearing my voice of reason/truth hat>
It seems like a cheap back-door tactic to me. Players should be aware of accusations made against them, making accusations based on an feeling that they're playing better than you thought they would seems like poor gamesmanship. Have you always done these reports entirely behind the scenes? I'd be interested in looking at the game chats, unless you've conveniently forgotten those.Extreme Ways wrote:I have filed 1, maybe 2. I dont often play with lower ranked players because of my clan play, and even then they have to play way better than expected. This is also easier in 1v1 than in the games I'll play. Nymeria Stark was one of those I had silently, I was wrong. Why am I bullying him if I do it behind the scenes? I dont perceive it was you bullying me if you accuse me of being a multi, why should I be offended? Seems like a trollpost to me.Symmetry wrote:Filing an e-ticket on a lower ranked player just because you don't like the way they've played a game? That seems like you might be bullying lower ranked players, just because you have the benefit of experience.Extreme Ways wrote:So to actually respond to your post: If Kaskavel finds your play better than expected from a new player, he gets suspicious. That's nothing personal, it's just an alarm bell that starts ringing saying "hey, this player might not be new after all". Hive is a difficult map, playing a near-perfect turn as new player on such a chaotic map by accident is tough, that caused the alarm bell to ring. "Good enough to be mistaken for a multi" is hard to define. I've filed tickets for some players because I thought they were too good for their experience, but it differs per player. In my case, I wanted to play some more with these players but wanted to make sure they weren't multis before I invited them. In Kaskavel's case, it's likely he wants a fair game. He loses a lot of points versus a lower ranked player, and if that lower ranked player is actually way better it's unfair to him.CommKnight wrote:So I happened across the Cheating & Abuse forum and found one filled out about me.
This one.
This was shortly after reading a comment on my wall left by b00060 accusing me of being a multi account and blocking me. (Wonder if it has anything to do with mine and his games in tournament at the moment).
I mean I'm competitive in real life at this game but am new to this site. Am I really good enough to be mistaken for a multi account? I was on a winning streak in my first games but lately the dice have been killing me (or perhaps my strategy isn't as effective as I thought).
I'm just wondering if I'm actually that good so far? I mean I'll take the accusations as a compliment any day of the week. But curious as to what the general public thinks.
How often are you right with your e-tickets?

With the exception of new players, people that have a rating of ~4.6 or lower are sometimes asses. Not all of them, but from 4.6 you can expect some kind of douchebaggery. Again, if they are assholes they arent assholes all the time, but it's something to keep in mind.CommKnight wrote:This guy is so sour. Is he always this much of an ass?