Make the next battle royale assassin *rejected*

gibbom · Post by **gibbom** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:19 am

We've had standard battle royales, and now a terminator. But really it's time for the ultimate test of patience, tactics and luck - a battle royale set to assassin!

This would be a laugh and a half, but on the serious side would be a real test of patience in that unless you are deployed next to your target no-one with half a brain will attack in the whole game. It would introduce a whole new dimension to battle royale play.

This is needed because terminator is soft. It means you can pick up points even if you lose. Standard is a step in the right direction, but assassin is the ultimate test, because as soon as you attack - you lose.

Priority: 2, because it is a crazy idea but would be a real mind-bender.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:27 am

a no cards one would be fun....it should only take a decade or so to finish

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:37 am

Hmm, now how did I know that AAfitz would be the first one to comment on a thread about Battle Royal?? I think he smells it in the air and is drawn to it.

SirSebstar · Post by **SirSebstar** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:41 am

Just do me a favor and pm me when a battle royale is on or about to be on. I will not sleep 24 hours prior,so reserve me a seat please

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:17 am

umm, that wouldn't work. if everyone is given one country, there's no way you could get to your target w/o taking out others along the way. Nobody could attack unless you were adjacent to your target.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:27 am

It would be more of a game of chance than normal...

However - sod Assassin... make it Sequential I say...

C.

gibbom · Post by **gibbom** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:48 am

wicked wrote:umm, that wouldn't work. if everyone is given one country, there's no way you could get to your target w/o taking out others along the way. Nobody could attack unless you were adjacent to your target.

gibbom wrote:... unless you are deployed next to your target no-one with half a brain will attack in the whole game.

... assassin is the ultimate test, because as soon as you attack - you lose.

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:04 am

simply: it wouldnt work

demigod · Post by **demigod** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:14 am

wicked wrote:umm, that wouldn't work. if everyone is given one country, there's no way you could get to your target w/o taking out others along the way. Nobody could attack unless you were adjacent to your target.

lol - gibbom

got one

alex_white101 · Post by **alex_white101** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:32 am

THIEF! this was my idea weeks ago..............

Genghis Khan CA · Post by **Genghis Khan CA** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:36 pm

Hahahahaha

I like how some people missed the joke...

Most likely it would finish in 1 round as a n00b attacked randomly for a card, thereby handing the game to a third party

Make the next battle royale assassin rejected

Should the next battle royale be an assassin game?

Make the next battle royale assassin rejected