Moderator: Community Team
Very much hyperbole. Also, bare in mind the possibility of my day posting being average but my actions side of play to be dangerous.BuJaber wrote:We were promised on day 1 that MM is a beast at playing day 2 onwards. (paraphrasing and possible hyperbole) Show us the magic please. Apart from the mason claim, not that much coming from you. Feeling teased here.
There's really not much else to say following on from the post where I voted him. I don't entirely believe his 'ignorance' excuse of the mason role, especially after the venomous-like posting in trying to generate a bandwagon on me.Thorthoth wrote:The townish* vote seems to be getting split three ways.
(Four, if I count Minister's vote on Ragian. MM, please elaborate more on that).

ZaBeast wrote:I thought I might give a rundown of the different arguments for voting the main lynch candidates (imo) (stolen from me and other people, for your convenience)
1) MudPuppy:2) BuJ
- My "role fishing" deserves suspicion, yet dakky's doesn't
- BuJ argument: he wanted to unvote thor on D1 because he didn't care who between him and MM would die but could potentially point fingers at the lynchers
- Saying he's a "member of the hesitant/cautious lot", yet is completely fine with dakky shoting at random, as long as he doesn't kill thor
MudPuppy wrote:I, as a member of the hesitant/cautious lot, am on board with this approach. I prefer to wait for a replacement to join but also don't want to see another no-lynch day.BuJaber wrote:For the hesitant/cautious lot.. if y'all want to wait for IP's replacement we will wait. But if a deadline is announced I expect a lynch. We have enough good suspects that we can manage this. Any delays then would look very scummy.And these are two consecutive postsMudPuppy wrote:I suggest you don't shoot Thor. Pretty fine with whoever you think best after that. Not sure I understand who your groups are or why you group them in that fashion... but whatever floats your boat. If you think random is best, then go for it. Whatever you choose, we'd get some good information.dakky21 wrote:My first choice is BuJaber, second Thor, third Mitch and fourth Flores. MM, DDS also possible, and those not currently voting me. Third group includes Samlen, Puppy and Ragian, so I'll set up three random.org pools and come up with three names and then random them who to kill, so we must be very unlucky if I shoot the cop or some other important power role.
I wonder why no one suggested yet who should I kill, 7 people on my lynch but no one said who to shoot.
If you do get lynched, you really can't blame anyone but yourself.... You aren't playing like you want to live.- Trying to restart a dead bandwagon about 48 hours before the deadline (D2). He didn't vote prior to that. Why not do that while it still had a chance to get traction? Especially when his first post of the day contained this quote:
At this point, any wagon on someone other than dakky would have resulted in either a speed lynch or a no lynch, possibly without the lynchee having even the possibility to claim. Also, I don't see how he could think MM is less guilty of trying to fly under the radar than HS.MudPuppy wrote:Anyway, none of this "it's another D1" nonsense... it's D2 and we need to string someone up.- Posts sparingly, and sometimes fluff
2') mitch
- Proposes 3 ways to end D1, two of them basically being starting a quick bandwagon (post)
- Soft-claiming a useless/not in the setup dwarf while there was no reason to do so
- "Mason-fishing"
- Thought the one with the most votes would get lynched at the end of the day, yet voted for MudPuppy, a case that was unlikely to gain traction. Therefore, the argument he made with MudPuppy can be applied to him. He wanted to not vote for any of the two persons that had the most votes so he could throw fingers around when one of them ended up being lynched.
And it seems he kinda wanted to, with his post during N1BuJaber wrote:LV, did the day end with no lynch because with KJ's vote it would have been 4-4 between HS and no lynch?- Is on the dakky wagon (and was convinced he was scum) <---I actually wouldn't hold it against him, it's not my point, but it has been made
- Skimming? He didn't realized Flores suspected pika before he tried to "bait" her.
Now, I like what I've seen so far from mitch in D3. He did try to make a case on pika and didn't try to go on an easy BW like D2. The answers he gave made sense. I don't think he explained his role-fishing (he just said he hasn't), but oh well. He soft-claimed a power-role, so I'd rather not lynch him yet since I he might be useful to town. And as Flores said, he is surely not the most dangerous scum out there, if he is one of them. I still feel like too many people are hinting at being a power role for the numbers of spots left in pika's list though. I believe the scumminess is strong in MP, so I'll go back to him Unvote Vote MudPuppy. Note that I'll switch back to whoever of the three has the most votes if a deadline draws near, but I'd rather lynch MP (2nd place is probably close to a tie between mitch and BJ)
- Inconsistent with his posts at best
- Basically everything he did D2
On other note i haven't made the connections of if X is scum then Y must be town as some of you have made, except for the binomium MM - skoff, honestly i believe everyone could be guilty until proven innocent, so i wont make such deductions until i have the chance to observe the reactions and arguments around a vote, claim and or a lynch, the only alive ppl ATM in my white list are thor and MM, the rest is in a very large grey zone, with pika, mitch, BuJ and puppy in the darker side of the spectrum.Ragian wrote:I don't think Mitch claiming right now is a good thing. I think he's town.
@Beast & Flores, let's say we lynch MP. Who would you suspect as his scumbuddies if he flips scum? And whom would you think are defo town?

Thorthoth wrote:LoVo miscounted the votes...
HotShot still hasn't showed up...
I'm getting tired of this.
MInister is still voting for Ragian. Zabeast is voting for MP, and Flores just moved her vote to MudPuppy too.
& set a deadline too.
ChillRagian wrote:You're taking typos way too personally.


I posted several times at the beginning of the day, and my vote was placed (and still is) on mitch. He's given me no indication to change my vote, all he's said is 'I'm a PR role, but I won't tell you which so you better not vote for me'. My lack of posting the last few days is because of IRL stuff. I've still been more active overall than some of the other people on that list, and I'll post more when I catch up on my coursework.BuJaber wrote:This is a terrible situation for town. We need KJ, Hotshot, MM, Samlen, Pika, MP to voice their opinions clearly as soon as possible.
I won't bother going back and quoting my posts from Day 1, but I've already explained several times that I am a brand new player and was too eager and got pounced on for making a mistake. Considering we had someone leave the game because of the super aggressiveness and bullying that went on, I don't see why my 'defensiveness' on day 1 is STILL somehow an issue for you. But then you were the one who tried to imply that my vote was the reason no one was lynched on Day 1 so I'm starting to wonder if this is more of an attempt to deflect suspicion given that several people are now already suspicious of you.BuJaber wrote:Plus KJ was overly defensive when he first joined and that still doesn't sit right with me.
If nobody counterclaims that then I think it may be about the right time for a mass "fluff claim" (character names only), from town's common perspective we are currently left with only two unknown players who are likely to be town Power Roles (the two of Bard, Balin, and Dwalin who are not played by Thorthoth), with two who are not (the players of Óin and Glóin), one player who is already known to be a Power Role (MudPuppy), two who are already known not to be (Thorthoth & Minister Masket), and five others who are either vanilla or scum (the players of Nori, Ori, Bifur, Bofur, and Bombur).MudPuppy wrote:Looks like L-1... I'm Gandalf... but not going to divulge my power.
The mystery of whether they are the Doctor or not can be the only thing which might prevent scum from targetting them tonight provided we do not mass fluff claim, if they do claim and they are the Doctor then they will surely be killed tonight, otherwise it is a lot less certain, by refusing to claim at all you potentially get the benefits of both possibilities... Only scum should want Gandalf's exact role mechanics revealed quite frankly so...Ragian wrote:Fucking Gandalf? Why not disclose your power(s)?

as long as no one counterclaim i don't see why he should do that Unvote PuppyRagian wrote:Fucking Gandalf? Why not disclose your power(s)?
How can i not be weary of your rodent self when you keep trying to fish so badly, you started with trying to out the dwarfs and now mass claim on freaking D3? it really bugs me but when you are right, you are right, ragian's post did rub me on the wrong way, but he has been fishing a lot too, so i didnt realize the very scummy implications until you spelled it out and i agree Vote RagsPikanchion wrote: If nobody counterclaims that then I think it may be about the right time for a mass "fluff claim" (character names only)
The mystery of whether they are the Doctor or not can be the only thing which might prevent scum from targetting them tonight provided we do not mass fluff claim, if they do claim and they are the Doctor then they will surely be killed tonight, otherwise it is a lot less certain, by refusing to claim at all you potentially get the benefits of both possibilities... Only scum should want Gandalf's exact role mechanics revealed quite frankly so...Ragian wrote:Fucking Gandalf? Why not disclose your power(s)?
Unvote: madmitch
Vote: Ragian

